Zootaxa 3734 (4): 499–500 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) ZOOTAXA www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Correspondence Copyright © 2013 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3734.4.9 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B3E6290D-08E0-4C1A-8DB5-14DEDCDD965D Baltidrilus nom. nov., a substitute name for the genus Heterochaeta Claparède, 1863 (Annelida, Clitellata, Tubificidae) non Heterochaeta Westwood, 1843 (Insecta, Mantodea, Mantidae) TARMO TIMM Estonian University of Life Sciences, Centre for Limnology, 61117 Rannu, Tartumaa, Estonia. E-mail [email protected] The annelid genus Heterochaeta, with the single species H. costata, was first described from the marine littoral near Cherbourg, Normandy in France, by Claparède (1863). Although sexually immature, the worms can obviously be distinguished from all other marine tubificids by the peculiar palmate shape of the dorsal chaetae (erroneously interpreted as bowl-like by Claparède) in segments V–XIII while all other chaetae are bifid. The presence of two widely divergent kinds of short chaetae (long hair-like chaetae are lacking in this species) is reflected in the genus name Heterochaeta. Palmate dorsal chaetae with a broad comb-like ("costate") distal end occur in a few freshwater tubificids (Brinkhurst 1971). Among marine tubificids, only Tubifex thompsoni Southern, 1909 possesses a set of chaetae identical to that in H. costata but combined with strangely different (aberrant?) male ducts and penial chaetae; that species was never found after its original description by Southern (1909) and was therefore regarded as a synonym of the latter taxon by the more recent authors (Brinkhurst 1971). The palmate portion of chaetae in H. costata is actually not bowl-like but only slightly concave, spoon-like. Furthermore, some bifid dorsal chaetae in the neighbouring segments can display short intermediate denticles, being thus pectinate. These characters were established by Benham (1891) who also described the reproductive organs of this species. Michaelsen (1900) in his monograph of Oligochaeta transferred H. costata to the genus Psammoryctes, owing to the similarity of its palmate chaetae with those of Psammoryctes (now Psammoryctides) barbatus (Grube, 1861). However, in the Appendix of the same book (p. 525) he treats the species as a member of the extended genus Tubifex Lamarck, 1816. As Tubifex costatus (Claparède, 1863) the species was found to be a common oligochaete in the European brackish-water littoral and estuaries during the subsequent 85 years. In the brackish-water Baltic Sea it occurs everywhere in the sublittoral down to a maximum depth of 69 m (Timm 1987), or even 80 m (Järvekülg 1979). The monotypic genus Heterochaeta was re-established by Holmquist (1985) in a revision of the genus Tubifex sensu Michaelsen (1900). Unfortunately, neither Holmquist nor other annelid researchers were aware of the senior homonym of this name. The genus-group name Heterochaeta became first available actually in Westwood (1843) when it was established for a new African mantodean subgenus within the species name Toxodera (Heterochaeta) tenuipes. Thus Heterochaeta Claparède, 1863 is a junior homonym of Heterochaeta Westwood, 1843 (Insecta, Mantodea). As no available junior synonyms are available for the name of the annelid genus, it must be replaced with a new substitute name according to Article 60.1 in the ICZN (1999). I propose the new name Baltidrilus nom. nov., with the type species Heterochaeta costata Claparède, 1863, by monotypy. The name is derived from the name of the Baltic Sea where this species dominates among the oligochaete clitellates. Addendum: The name Heterochaeta was given, in the same year with the clitellate annelid genus, also to a marine copepod crustacean genus, by Claus (1863). Later on, Giesbrecht & Schmeil (1898: footnote p. 113) renamed it Heterorhabdus Giesbrecht as the name Heterochaeta had been occupied by an insect genus described by Westwood in "1841–43" (in fact, the referred source "Arcana…" has been published during several years, in 1841–1845). Walter (2013) comments: "This name was preoccupied by Westwood, 1841 for a bird genus and so was changed by Giesbrecht, 1898 to Heterorhabdus", however my searches for this name in bird registers of the world did not yield any positive result. The mantodean species Toxodera tenuipes was first described by Westwood (1841) without any subgenus name. I am obliged to Dr. Richard Storey (Heborg Environmental, UK) for drawing my attention to the homonymy problem, as well as to Drs Laurent Raty, René-Marie Lafontaine, Patrick Martin (Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique), Märt Kruus and Leho Luigujõe (Estonian University of Life Sciences) for their help in searching for the name in the Accepted by R.M. Schmelz: 29 Oct. 2013; published: 7 Nov. 2013 499 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 insect and avian nomenclature. Mrs. Ester Jaigma kindly corrected the manuscript linguistically. My study was supported by target financing from the Estonian Ministry of Education and Research (No. 0170006s08). References Claparède, R.-É. (1863) Beobachtungen über Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte wirbelloser Thiere an der Küste von Normandie angestellt. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 120 pp. Benham, W.B. (1891) Notes on some aquatic Oligochaeta. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science (N. S.), 33, 187– 218. Brinkhurst, R.O. (1971) Family Tubificidae. In: Brinkhurst, R.O. & Jamieson, B.G.M. (Eds.), Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 444–625. Giesbrecht, W. & Schmeil, O. (1898) Copepoda I. Gymnoplea. Das Tierreich, 6. R. Friedländer und Sohn, Berlin, 169 pp. Holmquist, C. (1985) A revision of the genera Tubifex Lamarck, Ilyodrilus Eisen, and Potamothrix Vejdovský & Mrázek (Oligochaeta, Tubificidae), with extensions to some connected genera. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 112, 311–366. ICZN (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, Fourth Edition. International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature, London, 306 pp. Järvekülg, A. (1979) Zoobenthos of the Eastern Baltic Sea (Donnaya fauna vostochnoj chasti Baltijskogo morja). Valgus, Tallinn, 382 pp. [in Russian] Michaelsen, W. (1900) Oligochaeta. Das Tierreich, 10. R. Friedländer und Sohn, Berlin, 575 pp. Southern, R. (1909) Contributions towards a monograph of the British and Irish Oligochaeta. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 27B, 119–182. Timm, T. (1987) Aquatic Oligochaeta of the northwestern part of the USSR. Valgus, Tallinn, 299 pp. [in Russian] Walter, T.C. (2013) Heterochaeta Claus, 1863. In: Walter, T.C. & Boxshall, G. (Eds.), World of Copepods database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species. Available from: http://www.marinespecies.org/ aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=347250 (Accessed 27 October 2013) Westwood, J.O. (1841) Insectorum novorum Centuria. The Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 8, 272–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03745484109442753 Westwood, J.O. (1843) Description of a new mantideous insect with pointed eyes. In: Arcana Entomologica; or Illustrations of New, Rare and Interesting Insects, 1, William Smith, London, 161–162, pl. 41. 500 · Zootaxa 3734 (4) © 2013 Magnolia Press TIMM