Novum Testamentum et Orbis Antiquus/ Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments in cooperation with the “Bibel und Orient” foundation, University of Fribourg/Switzerland. edited by Martin Ebner (Bonn), Max Küchler (Fribourg), Peter Lampe (Heidelberg), Stefan Schreiber (Augsburg), Gerd Theißen (Heidelberg) and Jürgen Zangenberg (Leiden) Volume 104 Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht James M. Scott BACCHIUS IUDAEUS A Denarius Commemorating Pompey’s Victory over Judea Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht Once again, for Gail With 13 figures and 2 tables Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data available online: http://dnb.d-nb.de. ISBN 978-3-647-54045-0 You can find alternative editions of this book and additional material on our Website: www.v-r.de © 2015, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG, Göttingen / Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht LLC, Bristol, CT, U. S. A. www.v-r.de All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior written permission from the publisher. Typesetting by textformart, Göttingen Contents Preface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Chapter 1: Pompey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Coins Commemorating Pompey’s Conquests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Pompey’s Theater-Temple . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 The Fourteen Nationes Conquered by Pompey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Imitatio Dionysi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Chapter 2: The Coin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 The Interaction between the Obverse and the Reverse . . . . . . . . . 42 The Reverse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 The Legend: BACCHIVS IVDAEVS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 The Kneeling Figure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 The Camel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 The Branch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 Chapter 3: Date of the Fall of Jerusalem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Josephus’ Date for the Fall of the Temple Mount . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Pompey’s Entry at the time of the “City Dionysia” . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 Appendix: Dionysus on the Reverse of Greek Coins with Greco-Roman Rulers on the Obverse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 Abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 Author Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 Index of Ancient Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 Preface This book is part of a larger project on Dionysus and the Jews that I have been conducting over the past several years. In the course of this research, I have encountered many texts and several artifacts that are either not generally known or are seldom considered by scholars of early Jewish literature and of the New Testament. Symptomatic of this situation is the dearth of information on Dio- nysus and the Jews in the standard reference works in these fields. The denarius under discussion in this book is a case in point. This coin is not widely known, and when it is referred to, it tends to be treated as a sidelight rather than the focus of concerted study. Given the specialized nature of their subject matter, my findings on this coin are being published as a separate study. It may seem extravagant to devote a whole book to one coin, but the importance of the “Bacchius Iudaeus” denarius is commensurate with its apparent connection with the beginning of the Ro- man occupation of Judea in 63 bce. Hence, if we can set this coin in its proper context and show its manifold connections within both Palestine and Rome, then we gain access to yet another piece of the puzzle that will hopefully help to complete the historical picture. Moreover, since this coin contributes to our understanding of the broader subject of Dionysus and the Jews, we now have further evidence from the history of religions to contextualize that linkage. It is particularly gratifying that numismatic evidence, which is underutilized by scholars oriented on ancient literary texts, should be useful for this purpose. Funding for this book was provided in part by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. I would like to thank the scholars who have kindly answered questions relat- ing to various aspects of this book. These include: Rachel Barkay, Chris Bennett, Séan Freyne, Courtney J. P. Friesen, H. Gitler, Erich Gruen, M. P. de Hoz, Nadav Sharon, R. R. R. Smith, and Francesca Tronchin. My sincere thanks go to Max Küchler and the other series editors for includ- ing the present volume in Novum Testamentum et Orbis Antiquus/Studien zur Umwelt des Neuen Testaments. Christoph Spill and Elke Liebig of Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht have been enor- mously accommodating during the production of the present volume, and I am very grateful to them for their unstinting assistance. Finally, I want to express my appreciation for the help of Spencer Jones in the final stages of producing this book, including the creation of the index. Chapter 1: Pompey Coins Commemorating Pompey’s Conquests It is our thesis that the minting of the “Bacchius Iudaeus” denarius was not a stand-alone event. Rather, it must be seen in light of Pompey’s overall military and political agenda during this period of time. The coin is, in fact, part of a whole series of other denarii designed to throw a spotlight on Pompey’s trium- phal procession in 61 bce and his other conquests in the run-up to the dedica- tion of his spectacular theater-temple complex in Rome. The first thing we need to recognize is that, as the numismatist K. Kraft has demonstrated, our denarius is part of a series of six denarii minted in Rome within the very short time frame of c. 55/4 bce, the reverses of which were de- signed to publicize Pompey’s conquests in Asia, for which he had celebrated a triumph in 61 bce.1 For example, to underscore the fact that his third triumph was a celebration of Pompey the Great as world conqueror, three different de- narii were issued during this time frame in Rome:2 one portrays Victoria with a palm frond and surrounded by four wreaths; another features a globe sur- rounded by four wreaths, which recalls the globe carried in the triumphal pro- cession of 61 bce;3 and yet another contains three trophies,4 corresponding to the three continents of the earth over which Pompey had triumphed — Libya/ Africa (81 or 80 bce), Europa (71 bce), and Asia (61 bce) — thereby encompass- 1 K. Kraft, “Taten des Pompeius auf den Münzen”, JNG 18 (1968) 7–24. 2 Cf. Kraft, “Taten des Pompeius”, 20, with Taf. 1.6–8. See also M. Beard, The Roman Triumph (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), 20–21, with fig. 4. 3 See further in chapter 3 (with Fig. 11 there). Cf. Kraft, “Taten des Pompeius”, 15: “Schon seit langem ist erkannt, daß die drei gleichartigen Kränze auf diesen beiden Denar- typen nur auf die drei Triumphe des Pompeius anspielen können und daß der vierte Kranz mit den Bändern jenen goldenen Kranz meinen muß, der dem Pompeius durch Volks- beschluß zum Gebrauch im Theater zugestanden wurde.” On this coin and the globe carried in the triumphal procession of 61 bce, see also C. Nicolet, Space, Geography, and Politics in the Early Roman Empire (Jerome Lectures 19; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1991), 37; Beard, The Roman Triumph, 20 (fig. 4), 30.  4 Pompey reportedly had a signet ring with three trophies of victory carved on it, the presentation of which was used to confirm his death to Caesar (Dio 42.18.3: “Even when he had died, they did not believe it for a long time, not, in fact, until they saw his signet ring that had been sent; it had three trophies carved on it, as had that of Sulla”). Cf. Beard, The Roman Triumph, 14–15. Coins Commemorating Pompey’s Conquests 15 ing the whole oikoumene.5 In keeping with his self-image as a world conqueror, Pompey paraded his identification with Alexander the Great, from whom he derived the surname Magnus (“the Great”), reportedly wearing a cloak that had once belonged to Alexander himself during his third and final triumph (App. Mith. 117).6 He also later displayed a portrait of Alexander by the 5 Cf. Plut. Pomp. 45.5: “The greatest factor in his glory, and something that had never happened to any Roman before, was that he celebrated his third triumph over the third con- tinent. For others before him had triumphed three times. But he held his first triumph over Africa, his second over Europe, and his final one over Asia, and so in a way he seemed to have brought the whole world under his power in his three triumphs.” K. M. Girardet, “Der Tri- umph des Pompeius im Jahre 61 v. Chr. — ex Asia?”, ZPE 89 (1991) 201–15, on p. 210. Lucan (6.817–18) refers to Pompey’s triumphs over Europe, Africa and Asia, and to the irony that he and his two sons each died on one of those continents: “O pitiable wretches, you must fear Europe and Africa and Asia: Fortune divides your graves among the lands you triumphed over” (Europam, miseri, Libyamque Asiamque timete: distribuit tumulos vestris fortuna tri- umphis). For other statements that Pompey triumphed over “Asia” and/or the whole inhab- ited earth, see further Girardet, “Der Triumph des Pompeius”, 210 n. 39, 211, 214 with n. 54, 215; D. Feeney, Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginning of History (Sather Clas- sical Lectures 65; Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), 59–67. See further Nicolet, Space, Geography, and Politics, 31–33. The Roman historian, Cassius Dio, refers to one trophy carried in the third triumph as “huge and expensively decorated, with an inscription attached to say ‘this is a trophy of the whole world’” (Dio 37.21.2). 6 Cf. P. Green, “Caesar and Alexander: Aemulatio, Imitatio, Comparatio”, AJAH 3 (1978) 1–26, esp. on pp. 4–5, 9, 10, 16; A. Kühnen, Die imitatio Alexandri in der römischen Politik (1 Jh. v. Chr. bis 3 Jh. n. Chr.) (Münster: Rhema, 2008); D. Michel, Alexander als Vorbild für Pompeius, Caesar und Marcus Antonius. Archäologische Untersuchungen (Collection Lato- mus 94; Bruxelles: Latomus, revue d’études latines, 1967); R. R. R. Smith, Hellenistic Royal Portraits (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), 136. Green (“Caesar and Alexander,” 4–5 et pas- sim) argues that Pompey (rather than Caesar) consciously modeled himself on Alexander and promoted himself as the New Dionysus. Note, however, that in view of his triumphs cel- ebrated in 46 bce and his subsequent apotheosis, Virgil (Aen. 1.286–90) praises Julius Caesar as “loaded with the spoils of the East (spoliis Orientis onustum), thus comparing Caesar with the originator of the triumph, Dionysus, himself an example of a god who had entered heaven after earthly successes.” Cf. N. Holmes, “Nero and Caesar: Lucan 1.33–66”, CP 94 (1999) 75– 81, on pp. 79–80; P. Zanker, The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus (Jerome Lectures; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1988), 44: “For Pompey, the comparison with Dionysus or Heracles was still understood as a metaphor for the splendors of his military vic- tories in the East. But Julius Caesar was perfectly open in proclaiming himself a demigod.” After Augustus, cultic veneration of the emperor became fashionable, and the competent, virtuous emperor was expected to emulate Dionysus and the like. Cf. Tac. Ann. 4.38: “Most regarded it as an indication of his lack of self-confidence, and certain people interpreted it as a sign of his degenerate nature. The best of mortals, went the argument, were desirous of the greatest heights; so it came about that Hercules and Liber (= Dionysus) among the Greeks and Quirinus [Romulus] among us had been added to the number of the gods. Augustus had done better because he had set his hopes on it. All other things were immediately available for the principes: only for one thing should they prepare insatiably, that their memory should be bountiful, for if they spurned fame, they spurned their accomplishments of virtue.”