Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1 | Main Document e. us er h ot oses eodn lfy.or any ectionw npeurr rpequir For inysripght o o n s e n t of cop C EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement TABLE OF CONTENTS EIS NON TECHNICAL SUMMARY VOLUME 4 1.0 Introduction 1.1 1.1 Project Summary 1.1 1.2 Project Justification (Statement of Need) 1.1 1.3 Consideration of Alternatives 1.32 1.4 The Planning Process 1.39 1.5 Scope and Format of the EIS 1.56 2.0 Consultation Process 2.1 2.1 Introduction 2.1 2.2 Consultation and the Masterplan 2.1 2.3 Consultation and the ABR Project 2.4 2.4 Conclusion 2.13 e. er us h 3.0 S33..i12te DeSEsixctiersi tpLinotigco aLnta ionnd aUnsde S ite Context oses eodn lfy.or any ot 333...311 ectionw npeurr rpequir 4.0 Project Description For inysripght o 4.1 444...132 POCroponepsroatrstuieocdnt iaoDln eA vAce ct li tov i vi po t ni im tse i e es ne t s onf tc oWp orks 444...123 04 C 5.0 Flora and Fauna 5.1 5.1 Birds 5.1 5.2 Marine Mammals 5.20 5.3 Terrestrial Ecology 5.39 5.4 Benthic Ecology and Fisheries 5.58 6.0 Landscape and Visual 6.1 6.1 Introduction 6.1 6.2 Methodology 6.2 6.3 Receiving Environment 6.7 6.4 Project Description 6.10 6.5 Landscape and Visual Impacts 6.11 6.6 Mitigation Measures 6.19 6.7 Residual Impacts 6.19 6.8 Interactions 6.19 6.9 Conclusions 6.20 IBE0807/EIS01 [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement 7.0 Air and Climate 7.1 7.1 Noise and Vibration 7.1 7.2 Air Quality and Climate 7.35 8.0 Material Assets 8.1 8.1 Transportation 8.1 8.2 Background 8.5 8.3 Existing Conditions 8.13 8.4 Baseline Traffic Conditions 8.26 8.5 Proposed Development 8.31 8.6 Impact of Proposal on Road Networks 8.34 8.7 Cruise Ships 3.36 8.8 Construction Traffic 8.39 8.9 Traffic Assessment Conclusions 8.43 8.10 Services 8.44 9.0 Coastal Processes 9.1 9.1 General Introduction 9.1 9.2 Methodology e. 9.1 us 9.3 Data Collection and Site Surveys her 9.1 ot 99..45 PMroodpeolsliendg Cthhea Inmnpeal cDt eosfi gthne Channoesels eoodn lnfy.o r Canoy astal Processes 99..53 9 .6 Tthhee T Imidapla Rcte ogfi mthee Proposede ctCioanw nppeurr irtpeaqlu irDredging Scheme on 9.7 9 .7 TThhee IWmapvaec tC olifm thaete P ropFoor sineysripdgh tC oapital Dredging Scheme on 9.12 9 .8 Tthhee S Imedpiamcet notf Tt h r ae n o Pn s s epr no to p orf toc oRspeedg iCmaep aitanld D Mreodrpghinoglo Sgcichael mSeta obnili ty of the Channel C 9.17 9.9 Dredging Activity and Disposal of Dredge Material 9.28 9.10 Conclusions 9.51 10.0 Water 10.1 10.1 Receiving Water Environment 10.1 10.2 Potential Impacts 10.11 10.3 Assessment of Potential Impacts 10.14 10.4 Mitigation Measures 10.15 10.5 Flood Risk Assessment 10.19 11.0 Geology and Soils 11.1 11.1 Assessment Methodology 11.1 11.2 Existing Environment 11.2 11.3 Potential Impacts 11.17 11.4 Assessment of Potential Impacts 11.20 11.5 Mitigation Measures 11.20 IBE0807/EIS01 ii [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement 12.0 Cultural Heritage 12.1 12.1 Assessment Methodology 12.1 12.2 Existing Environment 12.7 12.3 Terrestrial Inspection 12.27 12.4 Marine Geophysical Survey 12.28 12.5 Underwater Inspection/Diver Truthing 12.39 12.6 Impact Assessment 12.41 12.7 Mitigation Measures 12.47 12.8 Level 2 Industrial Archaeology Heritage Study 12.51 13.0 Human Beings 13.1 13.1 Baseline Information 13.1 13.2 Potential Impact of the Proposed Project 13.11 13.3 Mitigation Measures 13.17 13.4 Residual Impacts 13.18 14.0 Interactions and In-Combination Effects 14.0 14.1 Interactions e. 14.1 us 14.2 In-combination Effects her 14.4 ot 1144..34 TTheech Nneicxat l SDtieffpicsu lties oses eodn lfy.or any 1144..76 REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHFYor inysripgehctt ioonw npeurr rpequir B1 GLOSSARY OF TERMS o n s e n t of cop B21 C APPENDICES Appendix 1 Appendix for Chapter 1 (Volume 2) Appendix 2 Appendix for Chapter 2 (Volume 2) Appendix 3 There is no Appendix for Chapter 3 Appendix 4 Appendix for Chapter 4 (Volume 2) Appendix 5 Appendix for Chapter 5 (Volume 2) Appendix 6 Appendix for Chapter 6 (Volume 3) Appendix 7 Appendix for Chapter 7 (Volume 2) Appendix 8 Appendix for Chapter 8 (Volume 3) Appendix 9 Appendix for Chapter 9 (Volume 2) Appendix 10 There is no Appendix for Chapter 10 Appendix 11 Appendix for Chapter 11 (Volume 2) Appendix 12 Appendix for Chapter 12 (Volume 2) Appendix 13 There is no Appendix for Chapter 13 IBE0807/EIS01 iii [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 ABR Project in the context of DPC’s Masterplan 2012 – 2040 1.3 Figure 1.2 Lands re-acquired or in the process of being re-acquired by DPC 1.4 Figure 1.3 Location of Dublin Port’s main existing berths 1.7 Figure 1.4 Trends in Port Tonnages 1.12 Figure 1.5 Trends in Port Volumes (‘000 tonnes) 2007 – 2013 1.15 Figure 1.6 Trends in Dublin Port gross tonnage and GDP, 1990 – 2012 1.17 Figure 1.7 Trends in Dublin Port’s cruise business 2004 – 2012 1.20 Figure 1.8 Projections of cruise passenger numbers to 2032 1.20 Figure 1.9 Projections of cruise numbers to 2032 1.21 Figure 1.10 Indicative progression of the deepening of the bar and channel in Dublin Port since 1800 1.22 Figure 1.11 Irelands International Spatial context in broad terms 1.41 Figure 1.12 Format of the Environmental Impact Statement 1.67 Figure 2.1 Masterplan Documentation 2.3 Figure 3.1 Location of Dublin Port 3.1 Figure 3.2 Location of Alexandra Basin West and Berths 52 & 53 3.2 Figure 3.3 Existing Navigation Channel and fairway bathymetry to MSL 3.2 Figure 3.4 Proposed Navigation Channel and fairway bathymetry to MSL 3.2 Figure 3.5 Alexandra Basin West – Existing Land Use 3.3 Figure 3.6 Berths 52 & 53 (Terminal 5) – Existing Land Use 3.6 e. Figure 4.1A Site Location Plan us 4.1 er Figure 4.1B Alexandra Basin West Works oth 4.2 FFFFFiiiiiggggguuuuurrrrreeeee 44444.....41352 C EALWToyxleocptexraikcantsainto ldoa nCrft a orNE ofBx osCiarsstos thSinin nWseg eWc aBrtivleolea snQrtttsi houR sonao f y5 Z- CR2Eoeo/conxt5im toe3Jenw b nepnReuirtrs -terpWyieoocqs euFenais r seoolRldns lrfCymee.or omsa no nyo fs vtCrauol cntsiotrnu c tion 44444.....86753 FFiigguurree 44..76 NMoorothri nWg aRlli nLgig Ohtpheonuisneg FDDor eienytsrtaipagihiltl o 44..99 FFFiiiggguuurrreee 444...981 0 BSAeelercxtthaio n5nd2 rt/ha5r 3Bo uaIngsfhir n a S sI on tt n rr fs uur e a ncc t stt ofuu tcrrroueepc tatout rbPeeo t oorel bbmeeog rv eMemdao rivnead 444...111503 C Figure 4.11 Dredge Material Locations 4.17 Figure 4.12 Project Construction Phases 4.26 Figure 5.1.1 Study area for winter bird monitoring in Tolka Estuary (outline in red) 5.2 Figure 5.1.2 Study area for seabird surveys in the shipping channel and approaches To Dublin Port 5.4 Figure 5.1.3 Results of Black Guillemots in Dublin Port on 17th May 2013 5.9 Figure 5.2.1 Location of observation points A & B for marine mammal survey, Dublin Bay 5.26 Figure 5.3.1 Temporal Variation in Bat Activity for each night (PM and AM) Throughout the 15 night survey period 5.52 Figure 5.3.2 Time of peak activity for each hour on the night of the 4th and 5th June 5.53 Figure 5.4.1 Map showing the positions of subtidal grab samples taken in Dublin Bay 5.59 Figure 5.4.2 May showing locations of subtidal video sampling positions (June 2013) 5.61 Figure 5.4.3 Ternary plot of PSA results from Dublin Bay 5.62 Figure 5.4.4 Distributions of PSA within the survey area 5.62 Figure 5.4.5 MDS plot of Dublin Bay fauna (Stress = 0.14). Group 1 are coloured Blue, Group 2 are coloured Red 5.65 Figure 5.4.6 Cluster dendogram indicating the distribution of sites based on faunal Distribution within the survey area of Dublin Bay 5.66 Figure 5.4.7 Representative imagery captured from the video taken along the inner Extent of the survey area. 5.67 IBE0807/EIS01 iv [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Figure 5.4.8 Representative imagery captured from the video taken along the inner Extent of the survey area. 5.68 Figure 5.4.9 Imagery captured from video data collected around the sites in close Proximity to the Poolbeg Lighthouse. 5.69 Figure 5.4.10 Imagery captured from video data collected around the outer stretches Of Dublin Bay 5.70 Figure 5.4.11 Imagery captured from video data collected around the outer stretches Of Dublin Bay 5.71 Figure 5.4.12 Imagery captured from video data collected around the outer extent Of the survey area 5.72 Figure 5.4.13 Habitat distribution map of benthic communities identified in the Present survey 5.74 Figure 5.4.14 Burford Bank dumpsite location 5.75 Figure 5.4.15 Sediment characterisation across the seabed of the dumpsite disposal Area. Data reproduced from INFOMAR (2010) 5.77 Figure 5.4.16 Sampling locations from the 1998 survey (red dots) and the 2011 Survey (orange dots) in the vicinity of the Burford Bank disposal area 5.78 Figure 5.4.17 Locations of fyke nets (May 17th and 18th 2013) and beam trawl Locations and May 17, 18th and June 5th 2013 5.82 Figure 5.4.18 (a) 2m beam trawl; (b) fyke net being deployed; (c) juvenile flatfish (plaice and dab); (d) brown shrimp (crangon); (e) Thornback ray Trawl T18; (f) Scaldfish 5.91 e. Figure 5.4.19 Areas subjected to maintenance dredging in 20us12 5.93 er Figure 5.4.20 Area of cSAC to be temporarily disturbed duothe to the extension of the FFFFiiiigggguuuurrrreeee 6667 ....2131 .1 PZLNSaohhonnoiipsdetepos o imcnMfag ooVp ncnietshia tuCaoganrhelin na IVegnrali f ealcuwnteed nrP cNAoeoirn eitsa eLse oc tPicornaw enpteduirr oripceonqstesuiiso r eondn lf y.oLr oancy ations 676 6....52222.32 19 4 F igure 7 .1.2 NViociisneit yC oofn Ytoourrks Rfrooamd C/ FPoor niignsysreiptgrohut nco tHioonu sPeh aRsoea Sd caennda rthioe 1 O in the 7.20 F Fiigguurree 77 ..11..34 NNofoo Ciissleeo nCCtaoornnf ttoouurrss ff rr ooo n mm s e n t CC of ooconnpssttrruuccttiioonn PPhhaassee SScceennaarriioo 12 ii2nn tthhee VViicciinniittyy 7.21 C of York Road / Pigeon House Road and the O 7.22 2 Figure 7.1.5 Noise Contours from Construction Phase Scenario 2 in the Vicinity of Clontarf 7.22 Figure 7.1.6 Noise Contours from Existing Port Operations in the Vicinity of York Road / Pigeon House Road and the O 7.27 2 Figure 7.1.7 Noise Contours from Proposed Port Operations in the Vicinity of York Road / Pigeon House Road and the O 7.27 2‘ Figure 7.2.1 Windrose for the Dublin Airport Met Station 1942 to 2010 (source: www.met.ie) 7.50 Figure 8.1.1 Site Location Plan (Location of ABR Project in relation to Dublin Port 8.2 Figure 8.2 1 Transport objectives from Dublin Port Masterplan – SEA 8.7 Figure 8.2.2 Traffic and Transport Assessment Guidelines - Thresholds for Transport Assessments 8.8 Figure 8.2.3 Advisory Thresholds for Traffic and Transport Assessment where National Roads are affected 8.9 Figure 8.2.4 Sub-threshold Criteria for Traffic and Transport Assessment 8.10 Figure 8.2.5 Extracts from the Local Action Plan, City of Dublin July 2011 8.13 Figure 8.3.1 Existing Transport Modes within the Vicinity of the Port 8.14 Figure 8.3.2 Cycling Facilities - Greater Dublin Area Cycle Network Plan 8.17 Figure 8.3.3 Public Transport Facilities – Dublinbike 8.17 Figure 8.3.4 Public Transport Facilities - Luas Light Rail System 8.18 IBE0807/EIS01 v [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:07 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Figure 8.3.5 Public Transport Facilities - Luas System - Red Line 8.19 Figure 8.3.6 Public Transport Facilities - Luas System - Red Line – Operating 8.20 Times Figure 8.3.7 Public Transport Facilities - Luas System - Red Line – Frequency 8.20 Figure 8.3.8 Public Transport Facilities - Luas System - Red Line - Journey Times 8.21 Figure 8.3.9 Existing Rail Spurs within Dublin Port 8.22 Figure 8.3.10 Existing Accesses to Dublin Port 8.23 Figure 8.3.11 Proposed Improvements associated with ABR Project 8.25 Figure 8.4.1 Location of Traffic Survey Information 8.26 Figure 8.4.2 Existing Daily Traffic Flows (2013)- Hourly Profile (Average Day) 8.29 Figure 8.4.3 National Traffic Growth Forecasts: Annual Growth Factors 8.30 Figure 8.7.1 DPC Predictions of cruise passenger numbers to 2032 8.38 Figure 8.7.2 DPC Predictions of cruise ship numbers to 2032 8.38 Figure 8.8.2 ABR Project - Construction Vehicles per Month 8.42 Figure 9.3 Existing approach channel bathymetry to Mean Sea Level (MSL) 9.4 Figure 9.4 Proposed approach channel bathymetry to Mean Sea Level (MSL) 9.4 Figure 9.5 Extent and bathymetry of the ICPSS tidal surge model (left) and east coast wave model (right) 9.5 Figure 9.6 Extent and bathymetry of the Dublin Bay model (left) and the mesh structure of the Dublin Bay model (right) 9.6 Figure 9.7 Typical spring ebb flow pattern – Existing Port Channel 9.8 Figure 9.8 Typical spring flood flow pattern - Existing Port Channel 9.8 e. Figure 9.9 Typical spring ebb flow pattern – Post Capital Dusredging Scheme 9.9 er Figure 9.10 Typical spring flood flow pattern - Post Capoitthal Dredging Scheme 9.9 F F iigguurree 99 ..1112 DDpprriiooffffppeeoorreessnneeccddee c ciiannap pmmitiatiiaddl l d ssdrppreerrdiidnnggggini nfeglgob s obesccd tcich ohucenw eunrpmerumrrr errpeeeoneqs net uis rtveo dnev lfyel.oor loacnicyt iyt ya as sa a r eresusultl to of ft hthee 99..1100 F igure 9 .13 Dthieff eprreonpcoes eind tchaep mitaela dnrF eosr dpingyrsriipingnhgtg o esbcbh ecmurer ent velocity as a result of 9.11 F Fiigguurree 99 ..1154 N oDtrhtiheff eEprraeosnptceoersl yein ds ttcho ae r mp m io t n aw es el aa n td nv orf e ecs odphpgreiiningggh tfssloc aohtde s mcpuerri nregn ht ivgehl owcaittye ra s– a result of 9.11 C Existing Port Channel 9.13 Figure 9.16 North Easterly storm wave heights at spring high water – Post Capital Dredging Scheme 9.13 Figure 9.17 Easterly storm wave heights at spring high water – Existing Port Channel 9.14 Figure 9.18 Easterly storm wave heights at spring high water – Post Capital Dredging Scheme 9.14 Figure 9.19 South Easterly storm wave heights at spring high water – Existing Port Channel 9.15 Figure 9.20 South Easterly storm wave heights at spring high water – Post Capital Dredging Scheme 9.15 Figure 9.21 North Easterly Storm - Difference in significant wave heights at spring high water as a result of the proposed capital dredging scheme 9.16 Figure 9.22 Easterly Storm - Difference in significant wave heights at spring high water as a result of the proposed capital dredging scheme 9.16 Figure 9.23 South Easterly Storm - Difference in significant wave heights at spring high water as a result of the proposed capital dredging scheme 9.17 Figure 9.24 Change in the depth of the approach channel between December 2007 and January 2008 (including maintenance dredging) 9.18 Figure 9.25 Change in the depth of the approach channel between March 2009 and March 2010 (no maintenance dredging) 9.18 IBE0807/EIS01 vi [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:08 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Figure 9.26 Change in the depth of the approach channel between September 2011 and July 2012 (including maintenance dredging) 9.19 Figure 9.27 Morphological model simulation input data for a North Easterly storm event - Offshore wave height and period (upper diagram) and tidal regime (lower diagram) 9.21 Figure 9.28 Change in bed levels after a North Easterly storm event – Existing Port Channel 9.21 Figure 9.29 Change in bed levels after a North Easterly storm event - Post Capital Dredging Scheme 9.22 Figure 9.30 Difference in bed level change as a result of the proposed capital dredging scheme - North Easterly storm event 9.22 Figure 9.31 Morphological model simulation input data for an Easterly storm event - Offshore wave height and period (upper diagram) and tidal regime 9.23 Figure 9.32 Change in bed levels after an Easterly storm event – Existing Port Channel 9.24 Figure 9.33 Change in bed levels after an Easterly storm event - Post Capital Dredging Scheme 9.24 Figure 9.34 Difference in bed level change as a result of the proposed capital dredging scheme - Easterly storm event 9.25 Figure 9.35 Morphological model simulation input data for a South Easterly storm event - Offshore wave height and period (upper diagram) and e. tidal regime (lower diagram) us 9.26 er Figure 9.36 Change in bed levels after a South Easterlyo tshtorm event – Existing F F iigguurree 99 ..3378 CDPDdrohirefefradetdn grCggeiinhennga gci nne sSn cbicenhehl e bdeme mledeev l– ee lvSse oal ufctthehar Enaeacg tiSseonotw eanpueurrsr tlrphy eoaqs esuE isr rteeoaodn lssrfym.outre la trne lyoy vf e stnthote r mpr eovpeonste -d Pcoaspti tCala pital 999...222767 FFiigguurree 99..3490 LTooctaalt isoilnt doef pthoes iltiicoenn asfetdeFor r d isnyrsrieipxgdh tm goeodn tshpso oilf dciospnotinsaulo suiste d isposal of silt 9.29 F igure 9 .41 Sswpuaosteipl rem nnaedtaeepdris as le d i m o e n s n e nt t ocf oconpcentration plume at times of high 99 ..3332 C Figure 9.42 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of mid ebb neaps 9.33 Figure 9.43 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of low water neaps 9.34 Figure 9.44 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of mid flood neaps 9.34 Figure 9.45 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of high water springs 9.35 Figure 9.46 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of mid ebb springs 9.35 Figure 9.47 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of low water springs 9.36 Figure 9.48 Suspended sediment concentration plume at times of mid flood springs 9.36 Figure 9.49 Total sand deposition after six months of continuous disposal of sand spoil material 9.37 Figure 9.50 Mean suspended sediment concentration during the disposal of sand spoil material 9.38 Figure 9.51 Transport of the sand material from the spoil site at end of 10 day South Easterly storm event 9.39 Figure 9.52 Extent and bathymetry of the 3D Dublin Port model 9.41 IBE0807/EIS01 vii [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:08 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Figure 9.53 Bathymetry of harbour area of 3D model of proposed development 9.41 Figure 9.54 Total silt deposition after six months of dredging of the outer section of the Liffey channel in the harbour 9.42 Figure 9.55 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of low water 9.43 Figure 9.56 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid flood 9.43 Figure 9.57 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of high water 9.44 Figure 9.58 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid ebb 9.44 Figure 9.59 Total silt deposition after six months of dredging of the middle section of the Liffey channel in the harbour 9.45 Figure 9.60 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of low water 9.46 Figure 9.61 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid flood 9.46 Figure 9.62 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of high water 9.47 Figure 9.63 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid ebb 9.47 Figure 9.64 Total silt deposition after six months of dredging of the inner section of the Liffey channel in the harbour 9.48 Figure 9.65 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of low water 9.49 Figure 9.66 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid flood 9.49 Figure 9.67 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of high water 9.50 Figure 9.68 Suspended sediment concentration plume at time of mid ebb 9.50 Figure 10.1 Receiving water environment 10.2 Figure 10.2 Elements of WFD status 10.5 Figure 10.3 Water Framework Directive water body status 10.6 e. Figure 10.4 Bathing water quality in the Dublin area 2012 (EusPA, 2013) 10.9 er Figure 10.5 Nutrient sensitive areas oth 10.10 FF FFiiiigggguuuurrrreeee 1111 0000....6987 ETBAFilxeldoetraoexthladn cnit5n udo2grrf/v a5Ier 3Bi si na(he s DxTiniuisd btWailnilne ga s)Pn t– do( e rPStx rtfieosoedtrrcitm ini1cogn wt Sienp)neu rdru – rp2 ero iqsgP0meuise0 rrpeoe dnMya ldfye.ociroc atad tnroeye frdl e C itmuorapnsa tpcaetl roFiofl odCo osdtaionsrgtma l s urge 111000...222043 f(oRre edx).is ting harbour chaFonr innysreipglh t( Bo lue) and proposed harbour channel 10.27 F igure 1 0.10 Ttsitmioderam l ol efs vuperegla edk i fwfea r te e n or cn sl ee e n ,tv oepf lrc oodppuorisnegd 1 c hina 2n0n0e l ymeainru rse teuxrins tpinegri ocdh a nnel, at 10.28 C Figure 10.11 Tidal curve in Dublin Port for 1 in 100 year return period river flows for existing harbour channel (Blue)and proposed harbour channel (Red) 10.29 Figure 10.12 Tidal level difference, proposed channel minus existing channel, at time of high water level during 1 in 100 year return period river flows 10.30 Figure 10.13 Shows the plot of wave height differences (proposed minus existing channel) for the worst case scenario 10.31 Figure 10.14 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 2.10m OD (4.61m CD) 10.32 Figure 10.15 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 2.32m OD (4.83m CD) 10.32 Figure 10.16 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 2.53m OD (5.04m CD) 10.33 Figure 10.17 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 2.71m OD (5.22m CD) 10.33 Figure 10.18 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 2.92m OD (5.43m CD) 10.33 Figure 10.19 Wave height difference plot (proposed minus existing) for water level 3.05m OD (5.56m CD) 10.34 Figure 11.1 Geology in and around Dublin Port 11.2 IBE0807/EIS01 viii [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:08 Alexandra Basin Redevelopment Project Environmental Impact Statement Figure 11.2 Location of samples taken for sediment quality Analysis - Alexandra Basin West 11.6 Figure 11.3 Location of samples taken for sediment quality analysis – Navigation Channel 11.7 Figure 11.4 Location of samples taken for sediment analysis – Navigation Channel 11.8 Figure 11.5 Location of samples taken for particle size analysis 11.9 Figure 11.6 Dredge Material Locations 11.17 Figure 12.1 Extent of Study Area 12.2 Figure 12.8.1 Location of industrial archaeological sites in survey area 12.59 Figure 13.1 Location of District Electoral Divisions (DEDs) in close proximity to Dublin Port Estate 13.3 Figure 13.2 Historical expansion of Dublin Port (Dublin Docklands Authority Masterplan 2008) 13.3 Figure 13.3 Location of amenities and recreation areas in close proximity to the Dublin Port Estate 13.4 Figure 13.4 Trends in Dublin Port’s cruise business 2004 to 2013 13.10 Figure 13.5 Dublin total economic impacts from cruise tourism, 2013 – 2014 (Bermello, Ajamil and Partners) 13.15 Figure 13.6 Projected percentage of cruise ships over 300 metres worldwide, 2012 – 2040 (Bermello, Ajamil & Partners) 13.16 e. us er LIST OF TABLES oth Table 1.1 A Summary of the depths of Dubloinses Peodn olfy.orrt ’asny main berths TTTaaabbbllleee 111...324 GOD(curvuoebrwrrlievntnhi ePt w,r oap rtoreto’fss pI rloioensnl aePgndo-d traet’ssnrm dPiFno rou g itrnlyrhsttroiispemgew hc tt( Ria2toohnte0w e npp1reu)rra u2rpteb)eq ulisirc, 1o9f 5Ir0e l–a n2d0,4 109 90 – 2012 1111....8111 321 TT aabbllee 11..56 MM20aa1ss3ttee (rr‘pp0ll0aa0nn ggprrrooo s wj e s t co ht n to s i eop n n tn rn oesfe dc scoip,co tfmiiovpena syr e2ea0dr1 t0roo –alli cn2tgu0 a4al0v c earraggoe lse)v els 2010 to 11..1145 Table 1.7 Average annual Cgrowth rates by mode 1990 to 2013 1.16 Table 1.8 Trends in Dublin Port tonnage and population, 1951 to 2011 and extrapolated to 2046 1.18 Table 1.9 Draught handling capabilities at different channel depths 1.23 Table 1.10 Trends in average cargo sizes by mode, 1990 to 2013 1.23 Table 1.11 A selection of large ship characteristics in various modes 1.24 Table 1.12 Distribution of container ship lengths and draughts in the range 1,000 TEU to 3,500 TEU 1.25 Table 1.13 Container ship draughts in the range 1,000 TEU to 3,500 TEU 1.26 Table 1.14 Distribution of cruise ship lengths and draughts 1.27 Table 1.15 Assumed increase in average cargo volume per ship 2013 to 2040 1.28 Table 1.16 Trend in ship arrivals from 2013 to 2040 1.28 Table 1.17 Proportion of arriving ships that could enter Graving Dock #2 1.31 Table 1.18 Scoping Matrix 1.57 Table 2.1 Statutory and Non-Statutory bodies consulted as part of the ABR Process 2.5 Table 2.2 Summary of Written Responses from Consultees 2.6 Table 4.1 Berth 52/53 Infill Volumes 4.13 Table 4.2 Dredge Volumes 4.17 Table 4.3 Summary of Infill Works 4.19 Table 4.4 Summary of Port Activities 4.21 IBE0807/EIS01 ix [Final] EPA Export 31-07-2015:23:40:08