160 SHORT NOTES Forktail 29 (2013) Acknowledgements Martin,T.E., Paine, C. R., Conway, C. J., Hochachka, W. M„ Allen, P. & Jenkins, We thank the Ministry of Environment and Forest India for funding our W. (1997) BBIRD field protocol. Missoula USA: University of Montana project, the forest department of Andaman and Nicobars for their practical Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit. help and staff at SACON for other support. Martin, T. E. & Roper, J. J. (1988) Nest predation and nest site selection in a western population of the Hermit Thrush. Condor 90: 51-57. References Saldanha, C. J. (1989) Andaman, Nicobar and Lakshadweep: an environmental Ali, S. & Ripley, S. D. (1969) Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan, 2. impact assessment. New Delhi.: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Second edition. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Taylor, P. B. (1998) Rails: a guide to the rails, crakes, gallinules and coots of the BirdLife International (2001) Threatened birds of Asia: the BirdLife world. Robertsbridge, Sussex, U.K.: Pica Press. International Red Data Book. Cambridge, U.K.: BirdLife International. Vijayan, L. & Ezhilarasi, N. (2007) Status and ecology of the Andaman Crake. BirdLife International (2013) Species factsheet: Rallina canningi. Final Report of the Project. Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural Downloaded from http://ww.birdlife.org on 15/02/13. History, Coimbatore. Ezhilarasi, N. (2009) Status and ecology of the Andaman Crake. PhD thesis. Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India. Natarajan EZHILARASI, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural Kumar, R. & Gangwar, B. (1985) Agriculture in the Andaman & Nicobar History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. Email: Islands. J. Andaman Sci. Assoc. 1(172): 18-27. [email protected] Martin, T. E. & Geupel, G. R. (1993) Nest monitoring plots: methods for locating nests and monitoring success./. Field Orn. 64: 507-519. Lalitha VIJAYAN, Salim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. A newly described call and mechanical noise produced by the Black-and-crimson Pitta Pitta ussheri TERESA M. PEGAN, JACK P. HRUSKA & JUSTIN M. HITE Introduction Figure l.The sonation. Each dark vertical bar represents one sonation. The horizontal band between 4.5 and 8 kHz is the result of background The Black-and-crimson Pitta Pitta ussheri is endemic to Sabah, insect noise. This spectrogram was produced by Raven software using Malaysia. It inhabits lowland rainforests from sea level to 300 m the same recording linked below. Recording by Justin Hite. Because and is often found in dense undergrowth (Erritzoe 2003). It is of the quality of the recording, the sonations have been artificially tolerant of disturbance and can sometimes be found in selectively highlighted with Photoshop for clarity. logged areas and overgrown plantations (Lambert & Woodcock 1996). Nonetheless, the species is classified as Near Threatened 11.500 11.000 because of high rates of lowland deforestation and habitat loss 10.500 (BirdLife International 2012). 10.000 The primary call of the Black-and-crimson Pitta has been well 9.500 documented. Lambert & Woodcock (1996) describe it as 'a 9.000 8.500 prolonged, relatively quiet whistle that gradually rises in power and 8.000 pitch and then suddenly stops'. 7.500 Two previously undescribed sounds produced by the Black-and- 7.000 crimson Pitta are documented here: a presumed mechanical noise 6.500 (sonation) and a call similar to one produced by the Blue-headed 6.000 5.500 Pitta Pitta baudii and hereafter referred to as the'boud/7-like call'. 5.000 The observations were made between 27 June and 27 July 2012 4.500 atTawau Hills Park, Sabah. The pittas occupied two different low 4.000 (about 250 m) swampy areas of primary dipterocarp rainforest, each 3.500 within 1 km of the park headquarters (4.399°N 117.889°E). How 3.000 2.500 many pittas were in these areas was not determined. 2.000 1.500 Novel sounds 1.000 Sonation 0.500 A recording of this sound can be found at http:// kHz macaulaylibrary.org/audio/169900, whilst video recordings of the Spectrogram parameters: bird perched and calling, then flying away and producing the sound Type: Hann Window size: 2762 samples off-camera, can be seen at http://macaulaylibrary.org/video/ Overlap: 70% 471600 and http://macaulaylibrary.org/video/471609.Thissonation Hop size: 829 samples sounds like a series of soft claps or pops. DFT: 8192 samples In the recording, the mean frequency range of each of the five claps was 85 Hz to 9.7 kHz, and the duration of each clap was 0.1 about 4 m up in a tree, where it sang at regular intervals. After about second or less. Hereafter the noise is referred to as a non-vocal 10 minutes, JMH moved closer and the bird became slightly sonation, although this has not been confirmed conclusively. agitated but continued to call. It then flew to the ground and The species was first seen making this sonation on 27 June 2012, produced the sonation as it flew from tree to ground. It was unclear when JMH encountered a Black-and-crimson Pitta after playing whether the presence of the observer had any effect on the back this species's song. When the bird was found it was perched behaviour of the bird. Forktail 29(2013) SHORT NOTES 161 The sonation was documented (i.e. recorded or described in Figure 3. Pitta baudii call. This spectrogram, was produced by Raven software using ML Audio 164150 (http://macaulaylibrary.org/audio/ written field notes) six times between 27 June and 27 July 2012, it 164150). The signals occurring between 0.5 and 1 kHz are background was also observed regularly without being documented. Five of noise. Recording by Martjan Lammertink. the six documented observations occurred in one general area, but birds in a different area were also observed to produce the sound. 4.000 In every case, the sound was made as the bird left a perch from 3.500 which it had been calling continuously for some time. In three observations, the bird left the perch, made the sonation as it flew, n 3.000 and then landed on a different tree where it resumed calling; in “ 2.500 the other three observations the bird made the sonation as it flew to the ground. Pittas were also regularly observed flying from perch £ 2.000 to perch and from perch to ground without producing the sound. S’ 1.500 The pulse interval of the sound was consistent with the rate of 1.000 flapping observed when pittas were seen in flight. 0.500 Baudii-\iWe call A recording of this call can be found at http://macaulaylibrary.org/ 4 5 6 audio/171509. This Black-and-crimson Pitta call is similar to the Spectrogram parameters: Time (s) female alarm call of the Blue-headed Pitta, described as hwee-oo Type: Hann (Lambert & Woodcock 1996, Erritzoe 2003), as demonstrated in Window size: 1466 samples Figures 2 & 3. The Black-and-crimson Pitta call tends to be longer Overlap: 90% Hope size: 147 samples in duration than that of the Blue-headed Pitta; the average duration DFT: 2048 samples of 32 Black-and-crimson Pitta calls in the recording (calls made by one individual) was 1.7 seconds, compared to an average of 0.8 toward the other, making the sonation described above 2-3 times. seconds for 36 Blue-headed Pitta calls measured (seven individuals). The pittas were not visible at this point but soft, low warblings were Thefundamental frequency of the Black-and-crimson Pitta call heard from their estimated location. One bird flushed as the ranges from about 1.1 kHzto 1.7 kHz, and the average fundamental observer moved closer and the other bird gave the novel call three frequency of the Blue-headed Pitta call ranges from about 0.98 kHz times and then hopped away. Both birds were seen briefly and to 1.6 kHz. appeared to be adult Black-and-crimson Pittas. This call was heard on only two occasions, both times by JMH. On 9 July 2012 at around 16h00 he heard a Black-and-crimson Pitta Discussion calling and began playback. The pitta responded with the Sonation undescribed call and he was able to get close enough to record the A sonation is a 'nonvocal acoustic signal' and evidence suggests call on his iPhone about 10 minutes later. The bird gave the call that sonations are made by a wide variety of birds and may be more frequently and regularly, calling 42 times (at a rate of about once common than previously realised (Bostwick 2006). There is little every 8 seconds) during the seven-minute recording. Another Black- literature on sonations in Old World suboscines, although and-crimson Pitta was calling nearby and later a second pitta was mechanical noises have been described in many of the African flushed. suboscines, including members of Calyptomenidae and On the second occasion in the same area at about 16h00 on 15 Philepittidae (Lambert & Woodcock 1996). Chapin (1953) noted that July 2012, two Black-and-crimson Pittas were heard calling from both the African Pitta Pitta angolensis and the Green-breasted Pitta different directions.The two birds approached each other over the P. reichenowi give a mechanical prrrt during short upward flights, next 15 minutes until they were about 10 m apart. Then one flew which he believed to be produced by the wings. In this case, the presumed sonation was always made when Figure 2. Pitta ussheri call. The spectrogram was produced by Raven birds were flying quickly through dense vegetation, and direct software using the same recording linked above. Recording by Justin Hite. visual observation was impossible. However, every time the sound was made the bird was in mid-flight, leading to the hypothesis that 5.000 the noise is a nonvocal sound produced by movements of the bird's wings. Although we did not obtain definitive evidence that the 4.500 clapping sound made by the bird is a sonation, it seems reasonable 4.000 to assume that the sound is produced nonvocally, given the ^ 3.500 behavioural context and that the pulse interval of the sounds > 3.000 produced are consistent with passerine wing noise. We are unaware u of any specialised morphology pertaining to the Black-and-crimson I 2.500 cr Pitta for this sort of sound production. It may be produced by a £ 2.000 whole-wing movement, perhaps similar to that used by Rock Doves 1.500 Columba livia when producing alarm sonations (Daanje 1950). 1.000 This sound is not produced every time the bird flies, which suggests that it is voluntary, meaning that it could be a signal 0.500 although its meaning is unknown. Although the sonation was first heard when the bird was possibly alarmed, Black-and-crimson Pittas 3:01 3:02 3:03 were flushed on many occasions without the sonation being heard. Time (mnrss) Spectrogram parameters: Most sonations occurred after the bird had been under observation Type: Hann for 10 or more minutes, suggesting that the noise is not related to Window size: 1000 samples the bird being alarmed by human presence. Because it was made Overlap: 90% Hop size: 100 samples consistently at times when the bird was calling from a perch, it may DFT: 1024 samples be related to breeding/territorial behaviour. 162 SHORT NOTES Forktail 29 (2013) Caii References On the two occasions the baudii-Wke calls were heard more than BirdLife International (2013) Species factsheet: Pitta ussheri. Downloaded one Black-and-crimson Pitta was present, suggesting some from http://www.birdlife.org on 20/02/2013. conspecific interaction e.g. a territorial border dispute. Bostwick, K. (2006) Mechanisms of feather sonation in Aves: unanticipated Whether male pittas alone or both males and females call levels of diversity. Acta Zooiogica Sinica 52(Supplement): 68-71. apparently has not been documented. If both sexes call, then the Chapin, J. P. (1953) The birds of the Belgian Congo. Part 3. Bull. Amer. Mus. two birds approaching in the second observation could have been Nat. Hist. 75A: 25-30. a pair, and the call could be related to courtship or pair bonding. Daanje, A. (1950) On locomotory movements in birds and the intention Also, because ofthe time of year, the earlier incident on 9 July 2012 movements derived from them. Behaviour 3(1): 48-98 could have been related to interaction between a parent and a Erritzoe, J. (2003) Family Pittidae (pittas). Pp.106-162 in J. del Hoyo, A. Elliott nearly fully-grown juvenile. & D. A. Christie, eds. Handbook ofthe birds ofthe world, 8. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. Acknowledgements Lambert, F. & Woodcock, M. (1996) Pittas, broadbills and asities. Mountfield The observations above were made by members of an Ivy Expedition (a group UK: Pica Press. of Cornell University undergraduate and graduate students participating in a Cornell Expedition in Field Ornithology [CEFO]). We are especially grateful Teresa M. PEGAN, Jack P. HRUSKA and Justin M. HITE, Cornell to Marybeth Sollins, founder and benefactor ofthe Ivy Expedition Fund, who Expeditions in Field Ornithology, Cornell Universtity Museum of provided funds to support this expedition. This is CEFO's first publication. Vertebrates and Labratory of Ornithology, 159 Sapsucker Woods Thanks go to our fellow expedition members, Julian Kapoor, McKenna Kelly, Road, Ithaca NY 14850 USA. Emails: [email protected], Drew Fulton, Daniel Gu, Sophie Orzechowski, and Brian Magnier. We also [email protected], [email protected] Website: http:// thank Maklarin bim Lakim, the staff of Tawau Hills Park, Kim Bostwick, Ann cefo.cornell.edu Warde, Fred Sheldon, and our expedition advisor David Winkler. White-shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni population size and the impending threat of habitat conversion HUGH L. WRIGHT, SOK KO, NET NORIN & SUM PHEARUN Introduction commenced cropping, publicly available data (Open Development Cambodia boasts a rich diversity of large-bodied waterbirds and Cambodia 2013b) suggest that more than 2 million ha of ELCs have harbours globally significant populations of several threatened already been granted. Despite their scale, very few studies have ibises and storks, and a crane (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund quantified the potential impact of ELCs on threatened species. 2012). While the future of these species remains perilous, recent This paper reports the latest White-shouldered Ibis censuses research has advanced understanding of their ecology and in 2011 and 2012, combining roost counts with supplementary data enhanced conservation responses (Keo 2008, van Zalinge et at. to revise estimates of the Cambodian and global populations. 2011, Wright 2012, Clements 2013). Greater search effort, Comparison of the distribution of ELCs and roosting White¬ collaborative and nationwide monitoring (White-shouldered Ibis shouldered Ibis starkly highlights the imminent threat that the Conservation Group 2012, Wright etal. 2012b) and species-specific concessions pose to the species. research (Wright 2012) have improved knowledge ofthe White¬ shouldered Ibis Pseudibis davisoni. Methods This species was once widespread in South-East Asia but, The White-shouldered Ibis is a solitary breeder in the dry season following a decline in the twentieth century, is now confined to (November-April) but gregarious in the wet season (May-October), Cambodia and tiny areas of southern Laos and east Kalimantan, gathering to roost in tall dipterocarp trees in dry deciduous forest Indonesia (BirdLife International 2013). In 2000 the species was or on river-channel islands (Wrighteta/. 2012a). The species often classified as Critically Endangered (BirdLife International 2001), with shows roost fidelity, using many communal roosts repeatedly in an estimated global population of fewer than 250 mature both seasons and from year to year. To improve population individuals. Since 2009 birds have been counted at wet-season estimates, White-shouldered Ibis were counted simultaneously at roosts in Cambodia and in 2010these revealed a minimum national known roosting sites in the 2011 and 2012 wet seasons. Counts population of 523 individuals (Wrighteta/. 2012b). were made in five study areas: Kulen Promtep Wildlife Sanctuary, Conversion of habitat to agriculture is one of the greatest Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary, Mekong Flooded Forest, Mondulkiri threats to the species (White-shouldered Ibis Conservation Group Protected Forest and Western Siem Pang Important Bird Area 2012) and to much of Cambodia's globally important forests and (Figure 1). Counts have been made here since 2009 (Wright et al. grasslands (Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund 2012). Government 2012b), with the exception of Mondulkiri where counting began land in Cambodia is classified into state public (land for public in 2012. interest or use) and state private (not for the public and available Roost sites were located by local people and occasional active for private purchase) property. The leasing of both types for searching by field staff. Without doubt some roosts are still to be economic development through various legal concession discovered: few sites were known before 2009, and the study area mechanisms, particularly as Economic Land Concessions (ELCs), is was large—more than 13,300 km2. Total counts therefore provide now the major driver of agricultural expansion in Cambodia minimum estimates of population size. The number of roosts (Poffenberger 2009). ELCs are leased to private companies for up surveyed in each study area (Table 1) probably varied due to both to 99 years, and habitats are converted to the industrial-scale the differing capacities of local organisations and the size of the cultivation of commodity or energy crops, such as rubber, cassava, White-shouldered Ibis population in the area. However, knowledge sugarcane and jatropha (Sukkasi etal. 2010, Open Development of roost site locations improved with time so that the 32 sites Cambodia 2013a). While many concessions have not yet surveyed in 2009 had risen to 68 in 2012. To improve accuracy,