Far Eastern Entomologist ISSN 1026-051X (print edition) Number 426: 22-28 March 2021 ISSN 2713-2196 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.426.4 http://zoobank.org/References/9AB3E8C7-67C0-4EEA-935C-E675977E78DF A NEW SPECIES OF THE BRISTLETAIL GENUS PETROBIUS LEACH, 1809 (MICROCORYPHIA: MACHILIDAE) FROM CRIMEA V. G. Kaplin All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection, St. Petersburg, Pushkin, 196608, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Summary. A new species Petrobius montanus Kaplin, sp. n. is described from Grand Canyon of Crimea. A key to the eight species of the genus Petrobius is also given. Key words: Petrobiinae, Petrobius, taxonomy, new species, distribution, key, Europe. В. Г. Каплин. Новый вид щетинохвосток рода Petrobius Leach, 1809 (Microcoryphia: Machilidae) из Крыма // Дальневосточный энтомолог. 2021. N 426. С. 22-28. Резюме. Из Большого Каньона Крыма описан новый вид щетинохвосток Petrobius montanus Kaplin, sp. n. Дана определительная таблица всех видов рода Petrobius. INTRODUCTION The European genus Petrobius Leach, 1809 includes seven described species, that differ from each other mainly in the structure of the urocoxites VIII and genital area of males. Among them, five species are common in the Mediterranean region. Two species distributed in Northern Europe have also been introduced to North America (Verhoeff, 1910; Reilly, 1915; Wygodzinsky, 1959; Wygodzinsky & Schmidt, 1980; Paclt, 1969; Mendes, 1980, 1990, 2013; Kaplin, 1983, 2010). This paper is based on the bristletails collected by the author and preserved into 75% alcohol. Нolotype and two paratypes specimen were dissected and mounted on glass micro- scope slides in the Berlese fluid. Figures were made using microscope and drawing tool. The holotype and paratypes of the new species are deposited in the collection of the All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection (VIZR), Pushkin, St. Petersburg. TAXONOMY Order Microcoryphia Verhoeff, 1904 Family Machilidae Grassi, 1888 Subfamily Petrobiinae Kaplin, 1985 Genus Petrobius Leach, 1809 Type species: Petrobius maritimus (Leach, 1809). 22 COMPOSITION. The European genus Petrobius consists of eight species: P. maritimus (Leach, 1809) (Britain, Ireland, French, Canary Is.), P. brevistylis Carpenter, 1913 (Northern Europe), P. adriaticus (Verhoeff, 1910) (Italy, Croatia); P. ponticus Wygodzinsky, 1959 (North-Western Turkey); P. artemisiae Mendes, 1980 (Italy, Malta); P. crimaeus Kaplin, 1983 (Crimea); P. montanus sp. n. (Crimea) and P. caucasicus Kaplin, 2010 (Russia, Kras- nodar region), of them P. maritimus and P. brevistylis were introduced to USA and Canada (Verhoeff, 1910; Reilly, 1915; Wygodzinsky, 1959; Wygodzinsky & Schmidt, 1980; Paclt, 1969; Mendes, 1980, 1990, 2013; Kaplin, 1983, 2010). NOTES. The main distinguishing features of the species of the genus Petrobius includes the structure of compound eyes and ocelli, mandibulae, urocoxites VIII and the genital area of male. A key to species of the genus is given below. Key to the species of the genus Petrobius 1(2) Paired ocelli are noticeably spaced from each other; distance between their inner margins about 0.21 total width of compound eyes. Urocoxites VIII of male each with distinct lobe posteromedially. Distal portion of penis elongate, pear-shaped narrowest at base; ratio length to width of this portion of penis about 2.6 …............ P. brevistylis Carpenter, 1913 2(1) Paired ocelli close together; distance between their inner margins less than 0.09 total width of compound eyes. 3(4) Distal portion of penis short; ratio of its length to width about 1.0. Urocoxites VIII of male truncate posteromedially .….….……..…………….... P. maritimus (Leach, 1809) 4(3) Apical portion of penis more long; ratio of its length to width more than 2.0. Urocoxites VIII of male with slightly, moderately or significantly protruding lobes between styli. 5(8) Compound eyes dilated or rounded. Paramera slightly longer than the basal portion of penis. – Apical portion of penis long, pear-shaped, ratio of its length to width about 3.0. 6(7) Compound eyes dilated, ratio of their length to width about 0.85. Paired ocelli close together, distance between their inner margins about 0.06 total width of compound eyes. Ratio of length to width of apical palpomere of labial palps 3.1–3.4. Ratio of lengths of apical and preapical palpomeres of maxillary palps about 0.56. Urocoxites VIII of male with slightly protruding lobes between styli ……...……. P. ponticus Wygodzinsky, 1959 7(6) Compound eyes rounded, ratio of their length to width 0.92–1.05. Paired ocelli almost touching. Ratio of length to width of apical palpomere of labial palps about 2.6. Ratio of lengths of apical and preapical palpomeres of maxillary palps about 0.70. Urocoxites VIII of male with significantly protruding lobes between styli ………..……………….. ……………………………………………………….…….... P. artemisiae Mendes, 1980 8(5) Compound eyes elongated, ratio of their length to width 1.1–1.3. Paramera shorter than the basal portion of penis. – Paired ocelli close together, distance between their inner margins about 0.07 or 0.08 total width of compound eyes. Urocoxites VIII of male with slightly or moderately protruding lobes between styli. 9(12) Paramera slightly shorter than the basal portion of penis. Ratio length to width of distal portion of penis 2.0–2.3. 10(11) Urocoxites VIII of male with moderately protruding lobes between styli …....……… …………………………………………………………..…… P. caucasicus Kaplin, 2010 11(10) Urocoxites VIII of male with slightly protruding lobes between styli ………..………. ……………………………………………………....……. P. adriaticus (Verhoeff, 1910) 12(9) Paramera noticeable or significantly shorter than basal portion of penis. Ratio length to width of distal portion of penis 2.8–3.3. – Urocoxites VIII of male with slightly protruding lobes between styli. 23 13(14) Paramera significantly shorter than basal portion of penis. Ratio length to width of distal portion of penis about 3.3 …..….………...…..….......... P. crimaeus Kaplin, 1983 14(13) Paramera noticeable shorter than basal portion of penis. Ratio length to width of distal portion of penis about 2.8 ……………………...........……………….. P. montanus sp. n. Petrobius montanus Kaplin, sp. n. http://zoobank.org/NomenclaturalActs/2CD27A81-E0A2-4780-A5C9-8F9793BE2CE6 Figs 1–11 MATERIAL. Holotype – ♂, Russia: Crimea, Grand Canyon of Crimea, 44°31′40″N, 34°01′00″E, 500–600 m, 07.IX 2020, leg. V. Kaplin, (VIZR) (in slides). Paratypes – 7 ♂, 2 ♀, same locality, data and collector as for holotype (VIZR) (2 ♀ in slides; 7 ♂ in 75% alcohol). DESCRIPTION. Body length: male and female 8–11 mm. Body width: male and female 2.0–2.5 mm. Antennae length: about 10–15 mm. Cerci length: 2.9–3.5 mm. Total eyes width: 0.8–0.9 mm. Eye length: 0.46–0.53 mm. Paired ocellus width: 0.43–0.46 mm. Paired ocellus length: about 0.16 mm. Coxal styli length: about 0.5 mm in male and female. Ovipositor length: 3.2 mm. General body color (in ethanol) whitish, or light yellow, without pigment. Antennal base, scapus, pedicellus, frons, occiput, mandibles, maxillae, hypopharynx, tarsi, tibiae, femora, 2– 5th palpomeres of maxillary palps, 2nd and 3rd palpomeres of labial palps with brown-violet pigment of low or medium intensity. Tibia and first tarsomere are the most pigmented. Flagellum of antennae without scales. Scales color light brown, brown or dark brown on the upper surface of the body; light brown on the ventral side of the body. Antennae longer than body. Distal chains of flagellum divided into 12–16 annuli in male and 17–19 annuli in female. Аpical annuli of distal chains with two “rosetenfӧrmige” sensilla of A form (Notario- Muñoz et al. 1997). Cercus approximately 0.36–0.39 (male) or about 0.35 (female) body length, including about 16–17 articles. Apex of cerci with two well developed lateral spikes. Articles of cerci, except for apical two, with 1–4 colorless supporting macrochaetae on inner side. Compound eyes dark with blue tint (in alcohol). Ratio of length to width of compound eye 1.14–1.19; ratio of length of contact line to length of eye 0.59–0.70 in both sexes. Paired ocelli whitish or light brown, shoe-shaped, subinferior to compound eyes. Frons slightly swollen between the paired ocelli. Distance between inner margins of ocelli about 0.08 and between their outer margins 0.92–0.95 total width of compound eyes in both sexes (Fig. 1). Apical palpomere of maxillary palp 0.74 (male) or 0.62 (female) times as long as prece- ding one, ratio of lengths of 5th and 4th palpomeres 1.33 and 1.23, respectively. Dorsal surface of 7th, 6th and 5th palpomeres of maxillary palp with 12, 11 and 3 (male) or 13, 15 and 2 (female) hyaline spines, respectively (Fig. 2). Apical palpomere of labial palp trian- gularly oval, 2.8 (male) or 2.7 (female) times as long as wide, with about 22 and 14 sensorial cones, respectively (Figs 3, 4). Mandibles with one (female) or two (male) distal teeth (Figs 5, 6). Fore and middle femur of male and female widened (Fig. 7). Hind tarsus longer than fore and middle tarsus 1.2 times. Ratios of length to width of femur, tibia and tarsus as shown in Table 1. Ratio of length of 3rd tarsomere of hind tarsus to its total length 0.31–0.33 in both sexes. Ventral surface of femora, tibiae and tarsi with hyaline spine-like chaetae in both sexes (Table 2). Ratio of length of coxal styli to width of middle and hind coxae about 1.32–1.34 in male, 1.48–1.55 in female. 24 Figs 1–11. Petrobius montanus Kaplin, sp. n., holotype ♂ (1–3, 5, 7, 8, 11) and paratype ♀ (4, 6, 9, 10). 1 – compound eyes and paired ocelli; 2 – maxillary palpus; 3, 4 – labial palpus; 5, 6 – apex of mandible; 7 – fore leg; 8 – posterior portion of urocoxites VIII, with stylus; 9 – urocoxite IX, with anterior gonapophyses; 10 – distal part of anterior gonapophyse; 11 – urocoxite IX, with penis and paramera. Scale bars = 0.1 mm. 25 Table 1. Ratios of length to width of main leg segments of Petrobius montanus sp. n. Sex, pair of legs Segments Male Female fore middle hind fore middle hind Tarsus 6.06 6.60 7.56 6.44 6.06 7.47 Tibia 3.38 2.45 2.90 2.82 2.06 2.50 Femur 1.94 2.12 2.46 1.92 1.91 2.53 Coxa 2.59 2.64 2.73 2.28 2.87 2.95 In both sexes, urocoxites I and VI–VII with 1 + 1 eversible vesicles, but urocoxites II–V with 2 + 2 eversible vesicles. Posterior angle of urosternites II–VII approximately 110–112°, VIII about 130°. Ratios of lengths of urosternites and urocoxites II–VII, on the one hand, and urostyli (without apical spine) and urocoxites II–VII, on the other hand, 0.52–0.63 and 0.56– 0.65, respectively, in both sexes. Ratios of lengths of urostyli and urocoxites VIII 0.73 in male and 0.75 in female, IX 0.77 and 0.64, respectively. Ratios of lengths of apical spines and urostyli II–VIII 0.36–0.40, in both sexes. Thoracic tergites, urosternites, urocoxites I, IV–IX; urotergites I–IV and X without macrochaetae. Urocoxites II–III with 1 + 1, urotergites V–VIII with 1+1, IX with 2 + 2 sublateral macrochaetae. Urocoxites VIII in male with slightly protruding lobes between styli (Fig. 8). Table 2. Number of hyaline spines on the legs of female Petrobius montanus sp. n. Sex, pair of legs Segments Male Male fore middle hind fore middle hind Tarsomeres 1st 1-2 2-3 3 2 2-3 3-4 2nd 5 7-8 7-8 6 6 6-7 3rd 1 2 0 1-2 1-2 1-2 Tibia 2 2-3 4 2 5 2-3 Femur 0 1 0 0-1 1 1 Ovipositor slender, elongate, visibly surpassing apex of styli IX (Fig. 9). Anterior and posterior gonapophyses with approximately 61 and 62 divisions, respectively. About forty basal divisions of posterior gonapophyses glabrous. All divisions of anterior gonapophyses with chaetae. Apical spines of gonapophyses as long as about 4.5 apical divisions combined. Distal divisions of anterior and posterior gonapophyses with 9 and 6 chaetae, respectively (not counting sensory setae and apical spines) (Fig. 10). Male genitalia with one pair entire paramera with numerous short bristles on abdominal segment IX (Fig. 11). Parameres noticeable shorter than the basal portion of penis. Ratio length to width of distal portion of penis about 2.8. Penis relatively long, significantly exceed level of the apex of urocoxites IX. Terminal portion of penis covered with bristles, longest in the apical part. Ratio lengths of basal and terminal portions of penis about 1.2. HABITATS. All specimens of Petrobius montanus sp. n. were collected in the forest (Carpinus sp., Fagus sp., Fraxinus excelsior, Quercus robur) among the stones. 26 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS. Petrobius montanus sp. n. with the antennal flagellum devoid of scales belongs to the subfamily Petrobiinae; with 2 + 2 eversible vesicles on urocoxites II–V, obtusangle urosternites, shoe-shaped paired ocelli, entire paramera on the IXth abdominal segment, molar area of mandible with 1 or 2 inconspicuosus teeth to the genus Petrobius. Among the described species Petrobius montanus sp. n. is most similar to P. crimaeus. Main morphological differences between these species are given in Table 3. ETYMOLOGY. The new species is named after the predominant habitat type. Table 3. Main differences between Petrobius montanus sp. n. and P. crimaeus Kaplin, 1983 Morphological characters P. montanus sp. n. P. crimaeus Length ratio of cercus and body 0.35–0.39 0.41–0.46 Color of paired ocelli Whitish or light brown Purple-brown Number of annuli in distal chains of 12–19 22–25 flagellum Ratio length to width of compound eye 1.1–1.2 1.2–1.3 Number of hyaline spines on dorsal 2–3 6 surface of 5th palpomere of maxillary palp Ratios of lengths of 5th and 4th palpomeres of maxillary palps 1.23–1.33 1.40–1.55 Number of teeth in distal part of mandible 2 (male), 1 (female) 2 in male and female Ratio length to width of apical palpomere 2.7–2.8 2.5–2.6 of labial palp Number of spines on middle and hind 2–5 4–9 tibiae Posterior angle of urosternites II–VII 110–112° 100–105° Ratio length to width of apical portion of 2.9 3.4 penis Parameres of male Slightly shorter than Significantly shorter basal portion of penis than basal portion of penis REFERENCES Kaplin, V.G. 1983. Bristletail Thysanura fauna of the southern coast of Crimea. Vestnik Zoologii, (5): 15–20. [In Russian] Kaplin, V.G. 2010. On the fauna of bristletails of the genera Petrobius and Trigoniophthalmus (Thysanura, Machilidae) from the Caucasus. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 89(4): 424–441. [In Russian; English translation: Entomological Review, 90(3): 387–404. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1134/S0013873807090199 Mendes, L.F. 1980. Notes et descriptions sur quelques thysanoures de l'Europe (Microcory- phia et Zygentoma: Apterygota). Memorie della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 59: 3–33. Mendes, L.F. 1990. An annotated list of generic and specific names of Machilidae (Microco- ryphia, Insecta) with identification keys for the genera and geographical notes. Estudos, Ensaios e Documentos, Instituto de Investigação Cientifica Tropical, Lisboa, 155: 1–127. 27 Mendes, L.F. 2017. Fauna Europaea: Petrobius. Fauna Europaea version 2017.06. Available from: https://fauna-eu.org (visited 25 December 2021) Notario-Muñoz, M.J., Bach de Roca, C., Molero-Baltanás, R. & Gaju-Ricart, M. 1997. The antennal basiconic sensilla and taxonomy of Machilinus Silvestri, 1904 (Insecta, Apterygota, Microcoryphia). Miscellania Zoologica, 20(1): 119–123. Paclt, J. 1969. Neue Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Apterygoten-Sammlung des Zoologischen Staatsinstituts und Zoologischen Museums Hamburg. 3. Meinertellidae und Machilidae (Thysanura). Entomologische Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Staatsinstitut und Zoologischen Museum Hamburg, 3(63): 269–292. Reilly, A.J. 1915. II. Notes on the British Machilidae, with descriptions of two new species. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, Serie 8, 16(91): 10–15. Verhoeff, K.W. 1910. Uber Felsenspringer, Machiloidea. 4 Aufsatz: systematik und ortho- morphose. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 36(25): 425–438. Wygodzinsky, P. 1959. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Machilida und Thysanura der Türkei. Opuscula Entomologica, 24(1–2): 36–54. Wygodzinsky, P.W. & Schmidt, K. 1980. Survey of the Microcoryphia (Insecta) of the northeastern United States and adjacent provinces of Canada. American Museum Novitates, 2701: 1–17. __________________________________________________________________  Far Eastern entomologist (Far East. entomol.) Journal published since October 1994. Editor-in-Chief: S.Yu. Storozhenko Editorial Board: A.S. Lelej, S.A. Belokobylskij, M.G. Ponomarenko, V.A. Mutin, E.A. Beljaev, E.A. Makarchenko, A.V. Gorochov, T.M. Tiunova, M.Yu. Proshchalykin, S.A. Shabalin, V.M. Loktionov Address: Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity (former Institute of Biology and Soil Science), Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 690022, Vladivostok-22, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] web-site: http://www.biosoil.ru/fee