A New Combination in Heteropolygonatum (Convallariaceae, Polygonateae) Minoru N. Tamura Botanical Gardens, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, 2000 Kisaichi, Katano-shi, Osaka 576-0004, Japan Shingchi Chen (Xinqi Chen) Herbarium, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 20 Nanxincum, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, People’s Republic of China Nicholas J. Turland Missouri Botanical Garden, P.0. Box 299, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0299, U.S.A. ABSTRACT. During preparation of accounts for the lacina [sic].” Liu (1991: 236—237) considered it a genera in the Convallariaceae for the Flora of Chi¬ member of Polygonatum. The species has also na, Volume 24, it was decided that Polygonatum been collected in southwestern Hubei (Lichuan, ginfushanicum (F. T. Wang & Tang) F. T. Wang & 1300 m, 19 Apr. 1973, H. G. Li 11080, MO). Tang (Smilacina ginfushanica F. T. Wang & Tang) Recently, the genus Heteropolygonatum M. N. should be transferred to Heteropolygonatum, as H. Tamura & Ogisu has been described (Tamura et al., ginfushanicum (F. T. Wang & Tang) M. N. Tamura, 1997). It is similar to Polygonatum, but differs in S. C. Chen & Turland. possessing both terminal and axillary inflorescenc¬ es (sometimes only a terminal inflorescence) and imbricate tepals. Originally, dimorphic stamen Smilacina ginfushanica F. T. Wang & Tang was length had been considered characteristic of Het¬ described in 1978 (Wang & Tang, 1978: 249), eropolygonatum, but this later turned out to be of based on specimens collected from the mountain no diagnostic value (Bao et al., 1998). However, the Jinfo Shan in Nanchuan County, Chongqing Prov¬ present authors still recognize Heteropolygonatum, ince, China (T. H. Hsiung & T. L. Chou 90841, and a molecular phylogeny of the tribe Polygona¬ PE). Later, after examining additional specimens from Jinfo Shan (T. H. Hsiung & T. L. Chou 91094, teae confirms this recognition (Yamashita et al., in PE; Phytogeographical Research Team 289, PE) press). and also from Jiangkou in northeastern Guizhou As Wang and Tang (in Wang et al., 1983) ob¬ Province (Z. S. Zhang et al. 400642, PE), Wang served, Polygonatum ginfushanicum (Smilacina and Tang (in Wang et al., 1983: 261) transferred ginfushanica) has both terminal and axillary inflo¬ the species into Polygonatum, as P ginfushani¬ rescences (sometimes only a terminal inflorescence) cum (F. T. Wang & Tang) F. T. Wang & Tang. They and also imbricate tepals. These characters clearly considered that the existence of a terminal inflo¬ indicate that the species belongs to Heteropolygon¬ rescence in this species allied it with the genus atum, so the combination in that genus is made Smilacina. However, they also observed an axil¬ here. Now Heteropolygonatum includes four spe¬ lary inflorescence in addition to the terminal one cies: //. roseolum M. N. Tamura & Ogisu (the type (except in some specimens), tepals connate to a species), H. pendulum (Z. G. Liu & X. H. Hu) M. high degree, papillae present on the abaxial side N. Tamura & Ogisu, //. xui W K. Bao & M. N. of the tepal apex, and ovaries with four ovules per Tamura, and //. ginfushanicum (F. T. Wang & Tang) locule, all of which they considered as character¬ M. N. Tamura, S. C. Chen & Turland, all of which istics of Polygonatum. Hara (1987: 158) treated are endemic to China (Chongqing, Guizhou, Hubei, the species under Smilacina, and cited the com¬ and Sichuan Provinces and Guangxi Zhuang Au¬ bination in Polygonatum as a synonym, but noted tonomous Region). The generic description, key to “This species is till now doubtful to belong to Smi¬ the species, and specific descriptions will be pro- Novon 10: 156-157. 2000. Volume 10, Number 2 Tamura et al. 157 2000 New Combination in Heteropolygonatum vided in the forthcoming Flora of China, Volume fore, the present authors adopt “ginfushanicum''’ 24 (Chen & Tamura, in press). and reject “ginfoshanicum”; see Article 61.3 of the Tokyo Code (Greuter et al., 1994). Heteropolygonatum giiifusliuiiiciiin (F. T. Wang & Tang) M. N. Tamura, S. C. Chen & Turland, Literature Cited comb. nov. Basionym: Smilacina ginfushanica Bao, W. K., Y. F. Yuan. C. L. Liu & M. N. Tamura. 1998. F. T. Wang & Tang, FI. Reipubl. Popularis Sin. A new species of Heteropolygonatum (Convallariaceae— 15: 249, pi. 14, figs. 3—5. 1978. Polygonatum Polygonateae) from Sichuan, China. Acta Phytotax. ginfushanicum (F. T. Wang & Tang) F. T. Wang Geobot. 49: 143—146. Chen, S. C. & M. N. Tamura. In press. Heteropolygonatum & Tang, in F. T. Wang, Tang & S. Yun Liang, M. N. Tamura & Ogisu. In: Z. Y. Wu & P. H. Haven Acta Bot. Yunnan. 5: 261, t. 1. 1983 [as “gin- (editors). Flora of China, 24. Science Press, Beijing & foshanicum"]. TYPE: China. Chongqing: Nan- Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis. chuan County, “Gin-fu-shan” [Jinfo Shan], Greuter, W., F. R. Barrie, H. M. Burdet, W. G. Chaloner, 1730—1800 m, T. H. Hsiung & T. L. Chou V. Demoulin, D. L. Hawksworth, P. M. j0rgensen. J. McNeill, D. H. Nicolson, P. C. Silva & P. Trehane (ed¬ 90841 (holotype, PE). itors). 1994. International Code of Botanical Nomencla¬ ture (Tokyo Code). Regnum Veg. 131. The specific epithet was spelled “ginfushanica” Hara, H. 1987. Notes towards a revision of the Asiatic in the part of the protologue accompanying the Lat¬ species of the genus Smilacina. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, in description and type designation (Wang & Tang, Sect. 3, Bot. 14: 137-159. 1978: 249). However, in the accompanying key to Liu, D. M. 1991. Polygonatum Mill. Pp. 221—251 in J. species of Smilacina (p. 29), the Chinese descrip¬ M. Xu (editor), Flora Sichuanica, 7. Sichuan National¬ ities Press. tion (p. 38), and the illustration caption (p. 43), the Tamura, M. N.. M. Ogisu & J. M. Xu. 1997. Heteropoly¬ spelling “ginfoshanica” was used. Hara (1987) gonatum, a new genus of the tribe Polygonateae (Con¬ used the latter spelling. When the species was vallariaceae) from West China. Kew Bull. 52: 949—956. transferred to Polygonatum by Wang and Tang (in Wang, F. T. & T. Tang. 1978. Smilacina Desf. Pp. 26-40, 249 in F. T. Wang & T. Tang (editors). Flora Reipublicae Wang et al., 1983), the epithet was spelled “gin- Popularis Sinicae, 15. Institute of Botany, Academia foshanicum," and likewise by Liu (1991). The type Sinica, Beijing. locality in the protologue was cited as “Gin-fu- -, -& S. Y. Liang. 1983. Notes on Chinese shan,” which uses the Wade-Giles system of trans¬ Liliaceae XI. Acta Bot. Yunnan. 5: 261-263. literation from Chinese. The alternative, pinyin Yamashita, J., F. D. Pu, J. M. Xu, M. Ogisu, T. Inada & M. N. Tamura. In press. Molecular phytogeny of the transliteration is “Jinfo Shan.” One might argue tribe Polygonateae (Convallariaceae) based on DNA se¬ that either “ginfushanicum” or ‘jinfoshanicum’ quences of the chloroplast genes trnK and rbcL. Amer. would be correct, but not t‘'ginfoshanicum.,, There¬ J. Bot.