REVUE SUISSE DE ZOOLOGIE 108 (1): 189-255; mars 2001 A generic revision of the insect order Phasmatodea: The New World genera of the stick insect subfamily Diapheromeridae: Diapheromerinae = Heteronemiidae: Heteronemiinae sensu Bradley & Galil, 1977° Oliver ZOMPRO Max-Planck-Institute for Limnology, Tropical Ecology Working Group, August-Thienemann-Straße 2, D-24306 Plön, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.sungaya.de A generic revision of the insect order Phasmatodea: The New World genera of the stick insect subfamily Diapheromerinae (Diapheromeri- dae) = Heteronemiinae (Heteronemiidae) sensu Bradley & Galil, 1977* - The North and South American genera of the phasmatodean subfamily Diapheromerinae = Heteronemiinae sensu Bradley & Galil are revised. All genera are redescribed, type species are mentioned or designated, and synonyms listed. Two new tribes, Ocnophilini and Oreophoetini, are established, and the Libethrini are synonymized with Diapheromerini. Genitalia, eggs and important other characters of most genera are figured. Ten new genera are introduced and five new species are described. Previously unknown males, females and eggs of several species are described. The genera are arranged in groups, with separate keys to all tribes and generic-level groups, including males, females, and eggs to the extent currently known. Key-words: Orthoptera - Phasmatodea - Diapheromerinae - Heterone- miinae - suprageneric revision - Diapheromerini - Ocnophilini - Oreophoe- tini - new genera - new species - new synonyms - lectotypes - North America - South America. INTRODUCTION Although a good number of the world9s largest and most spectacular insects belong to the Phasmatodea, this order remains comparatively poorly known. It is still a problem to attribute males or females to a species described on just one sex as both sexes normally look quite different. During the last few decades, phasmids have become more interesting to amateur entomologists and rearers. As a result, definite pairs of approximately 300 species are known from cultures; several of these are still undescribed. * Dedicated to my parents Gisela and Rolf Zompro. Manuscript accepted 30.09.2000 190 OLIVER ZOMPRO The most striking problem 1s lack of identification keys even at the generic level. The only monograph concerning this insect order, by Karl Brunner v. Wattenwyl (1907) and Josef Redtenbacher (1906, 1908), published in three parts, contains nume- rous errors, yet it still remains about the major reference point for specialists. A later basic paper on stick insect systematics was published by Günther (1953), which included keys to subfamilies. More recently, most specialists have been using the work by Bradley & Galil (1977) which, although mainly based on literature studies, included keys to tribes. The present work is based on the author's unpublished thesis (1998d) and represents an updated version. MATERIAL AND METHODS Whenever possible, this work has been based on type material. In many cases, the matching of the sexes has been confirmed by rearing species. However, in a few cases non-type material has been used. This study has received support from almost all curators of stick insect collections in European museums. Material from several private collections has also been examined. Stick insects were reared in cages and preserved as described by Zompro (1996). Examinations were carried out using a Zeiss Jena Citoval-2 stereoscope and drawings made using a drawing tube. Pictures of genitalia were made at 10x magnification, eggs at 20x. The terminology of egg structures follows that of Clark Sellick (1997). Antennae are measured against the body, and not against the forelegs as usual. This has the advantage that the length can be compared in specimens with reproduced or broken legs, too. Abbreviations used AMNH American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, USA. BMNH The Natural History Museum, London, England. DEIC Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalde, Germany. ETHZ Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zurich, Switzerland. HLDH Hessisches Landesmuseum, Darmstadt, Germany. HMUG Hunterian Museum, University of Glasgow, England. MCSN Museo Civico di Storia Naturale >Giacomo Doria<, Genova, Italy. MHNG Muséum d9histoire naturelle, Geneva, Switzerland. MIZT Museo Regionale Scienze Naturali, Torino, Italy. MNHN Muséum National d9Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France. NHMW Naturhistorisches Museum, Vienna, Austria. NHME Natural History Museum, Maastricht, Netherlands. NHRS Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden. OXUM Hope Entomological Collections, University Museum, Oxford, England. OZ Coll. ©. Zompro, Kiel, Germany, affiliated with Zoologisches Museum, Kiel. RMNH _ Nationaal Natuurhistorische Museum, Leiden, Netherlands. A GENERIC REVISION OF PHASMATODEA 191 SMFD Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Germany. SMNS Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany. SMTD Staatliches Museum für Tierkunde, Dresden, Germany. USNM United States National Museum, Washington, USA. ZMUH Zoologisches Museum der Universität Hamburg, Germany. ZMHB Zoologisches Museum der Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany. ZMUC Zoologisk Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. HT, AT, PT, ST, LT, PLT: Holo-, allo-, para-, syn-, lecto-, paralectotype. * = Material examined, in some cases by colour prints only. BASIC TAXONOMIC BACKGROUND As noted above, Bradley & Galil (1977) mainly based their work on literature sources, hence several of the inaccurate statements by previous authors are inadver- tently repeated and some others added. The Heteronemiinae are discussed on pages 178-180. In discussing the family Heteronemiidae (p. 179), Bradley & Galil adopt Rehn9s (1904: 53) opinion that Bacunculus Burmeister is a synonym of Heteronemia Gray. Zompro (in press) showed, that Heteronemia Rehn (nec Gray) is a synonym of Pseudosermyle Caudell. Further errors (all on p. 180) are as follows: the type-species of Bacunculus Burmeister is Bacunculus spatulatus Burmeister, 1838, a synonym of Heteronemia mexicana Gray, 1835, synonymized by Zompro (in press), but not Bradley & Galil, as their point of view on the identity of H. mexicana was based on Rehn's misidentification. The type of Heteronemia Gray is correctly mentioned later on p. 201. The authors of Manomera are Rehn & Hebard, 1907, not Rehn alone; Ocno- phylla should be corrected as Ocnophila Brunner v. W., 1907; Trichopeplus should read Trychopeplus Shelford, 1909. The key to the tribes of Bradley & Galil's Heteronemiinae, including their Heteronemiini and the Libethrini, as given by Bradley & Galil (1977) is solely based on structural differences in 5 genitalia, this meaning that no single £ could be properly assigned even to a tribe. Their Heteronemiini is characterized by "Margins of 9th ter- gum of dé turned downward and overlapping ventrally so that the segment, at least apically, appears as closed tube", the Libethrini by "Margins of 9th tergum of ¢ built normally, not ending in closed tube". Indeed, the genus Libethra Stal keys out into their Heteronemiinae, while the genera Diapheromera, Manomera and Pseudosermyle key into the Libethrini. Therefore it is proposed Libethrini sensu Bradley & Galil is a syno- nym of their Heteronemiini. The genera Clonistria Stal and Bostra Stal, both members of the Phasmatidae: Cladomorphinae: Hesperophasmatini in the sense of Bradley & Galil (1977), key out to their Heteronemiini, and are here transferred. The correct name for the Heteronemiidae sensu Bradley & Galil is Diaphero- meridae, introduced by Kirby, 1904, as shown by Zompro (in press), as, after exami- nation of the type-specimen of the type-species of Heteronemia Gray, Heteronemia mexicana Gray, 1835, this genus belongs into the suborder Areolatae, while all other genera and species included (more than 50% of all described phasmids) belong to the Anareolatae. 192 OLIVER ZOMPRO The family Diapheromeridae (=Heteronemiidae sensu Bradley & Galil) contains mainly stick-like phasmids divided into five subfamilies. Palophinae and are distributed in the Afro-Tropical region, Pachymorphinae in the Afro-Tropical, Oriental and Australian regions, and Necrosciinae and Lonchodinae in the Oriental und Australian regions. The Diapheromerinae are restricted to the New World; one genus in the Afro- Tropical and one in the Asian region are doubtful and are possibly members of Palophinae. RESULTS AND COMMENTS DIAPHEROMERINAE In this section, the tr1bes, generic groups and genera of the Diapheromerinae are described and discussed. Every part starts with a list of the genera included, followed by characteristics of the group and a key to the constituent subgroups. Then each genus involved is assessed and discussed. The lists of "species included" are not intended to be complete, as they only include the species which have been examined by the author and / or are considered to be definite members of the respective genus. This should serve as support to further revisors. All species are listed with the genus and specific name of the original description. In the keys, the median segment (first abdominal segment, fused with meta- thorax, but to recognize by a more or less developed dividing line) is often used as a character. This has the advantage that in many cases specimens can be determined to generic level even when the appendices are broken. The Diapheromerinae are to be split into three tribes. These contain the follow- ing genera, synonyms included (in alphabetical order): Diapheromerini: Alienobostra gen. n.; Bacteria Latreille, Le Pelletier, Audinet- Serville & Guérin, 1828 (=Pseudobacteria Saussure, 1870); Bostra Stäl, 1875; Calynda Stäl, 1875; Caribbiopheromera gen. n., Clonistria Stäl, 1875; Diapheromera Gray, 1835; Dyme Stal, 1875; Globocalynda gen. n.; Libethra Stal, 1875; Libethroidea Hebard, 1919; Litosermyle Hebard, 1919; Manomera Rehn & Hebard,1907; Mega- phasma Caudell, 1903; Rugosolibethra n. n. (= Caulonia Stal, 1875 (nec Loriol)); Oncotophasma Rehn, 1904 (= Paradiapheromera Brunner v. W., 1907); Paracalynda gen. n.; Paraclonistria Lelong & Langlois, 1998; Paraphanocles gen. n.; Phanocles Stal, 1875; Phanocloidea gen. n.; Phantasca Redtenbacher, 1908; Pseudoceroys Hebard, 1923; Pseudosermyle Caudell, 1903; Prerolibethra Günther, 1940; Rhabdo- ceratites Rehn & Hebard, 1912 (= Ceratites Rehn & Hebard, 1909; = Ceratita Strand, 1926); Sermyle Stal, 1875 (= Hoplolibethra Caudell, 1904); Spinopeplus gen. n.; Trychopeplus Shelford, 1909. Ocnophilini: Dubiophasma gen. n.; Exocnophila gen. n.; Ocnophila Brunner v. W., 1907; Ocnophiloidea gen. n.; Parocnophila Zompro, 1998. Oreophoetini: Oreophoetes Rehn, 1904 (= Allophyllus Brunner v. W., 1907). Incertae sedis: Bactricia Kirby, 1896 (= Scaphegyna Karsch, 1898); Pseudo- bactricia Brock, 1999. A GENERIC REVISION OF PHASMATODEA 193 Key to the adults and nymphs of tribes of Diapheromerinae: l Brofemorässtraieht: 0%. SI au. O E e, [acura ne Oreophoetini - Profemora curvedibasallyi cere Gole E E 2 2 Meso- and metafemora trapezoid in cross section, often armed (projecting keels or carinae not to be considered). . .......... Diapheromerini - Meso- and metafemora rectangular in cross section, obviously higher than wide, not armed (projecting keels or carinae are to be disregarded). . IO RES EUR EUR LR AN SAR DALE Ocnophilini Key to the eggs of tribes of Diapheromerinae 1 Capsule laterally almost round, in cross section rhombic......... Oreophoetini - @apsulerdifferent. .. U, 1 13 RO IE MEA MAAS RES PU REA E SE 2 2 2 @apitulumyabsent 774.9 114 RIRE AES RR DEE EL OI AE A 3 - Capitulumspresent er. >az u SR RL ANS Diapheromerini 3 Micropylar plate with broad, whitish margin, capitulum absent. . . . . Ocnophilini - IMicropylarplate-ditierentnt 22 er An re (ORE Anan mnt tunes Diapheromerini TRIBE DIAPHEROMERINI Characteristics. Stick-insect habitus; tibiae without area apicalis; abdomen at least as long as, usually distinctly longer than thorax; profemora not serrated; meso- and metafemora not evenly serrated ventrally, sometimes with few distal teeth, mostly unarmed; antennae distinctly longer than profemora; rarely winged; anal segment of d neither split nor bilobed; eggs with or without capitulum. Comments on Diapheromerini. The Diapheromerini contains the bulk of Diapheromerinae. Seven groups of genera may be distinguished by adults and egg morphology. The Phanocles group contains the largest members, the d sometimes being winged. The egg and d genitalic structures of its genus Alienobostra n. g. show similarities with the Bacteria group, but in the main characters it is a typical member. In the Bacteria group, the genus Paracalynda displays the same metamorphoses of the first antennal segments as Manomera of the Diapheromera group. The Caribbio- pheromera group agrees with the latter in structure of the d genitalia. The following three groups differ from the previous ones by the absence of a capitulum in the eggs, but it is impossible to separate the Sermyle group, in which the eggs lack a capitulum, from the Diapheromera group. The Sermyle group includes specialized genera which glue their eggs to a substrate. The genera of the Clonistria group show tendencies of developing highly specialized metamorphosis of the body and extremities; the most striking members belonging to Trychopeplus with several lichen-like species. Their eggs are bullet-shaped. The Dyme group includes highly elongated species, their flatte- ned eggs resembling those of the Ocnophilini. 194 OLIVER ZOMPRO Key to the generic groups of Diapheromerini: dd: 1 Tergite X closed ventrally by sternite X, appearing as a closed tube: vomernot produced=. 7%. Pak. N O 2 Tergite X not closed by sternite X ventrally, vomer produced.............. 4 Meso- and / or metafemora with one or more spines ventrally. ER ANA Rte Seka Bail asic Diapheromera group Meso- and metafemora without spines ventrally......................... 3 Median segment considerably shorter than metathorax......... Sermyle group Median segment almost as long as metathorax...... Caribbiopheromera group Median segment more than half as long as metathorax....... Phanocles group Median segment less than half as long as metathorax..................... 5 Thorax and median segment distinctly longer than abdomen. . . . Bacteria group Thorax and median segment not distinctly longer than abdomen, often shorter. 6 Mesonotum in the middle less than 19 times as long as wide. . . Clonistria group Mesonotum in the middle more than 20 times as long as wide. . . .. Dyme group Thorax and abdomen with longitudinal carinae............... Sermyle group Thorax and abdomen without longitudinal carinae....................... 2 Thorax with median segment at least one quarter longer than abdomen....... 4 Thorax with median segment less than one quarter longer than abdomen, ONMENSNOMET SALE TONNES MODERNE Sele RETI Sn TTT E 3 Mesonotum in the middle less than 8 times as long as wide. . . . Clonistria group Mesonotum in the middle more than 9 times as long as wide. . .... Dyme group Metathorax less than 1.5 times as long as median segment. ................ 5 Metathorax more than 2.5 times as long as median segment. es ER ES CR Bar BA ENT. Diapheromera-, Bacteria group ABAOMENSMOOMEE rn MORIN RE oes REN Dee Phanocles-goup Abdomen granulated, smaller than 10 cm.......... Caribbiopheromera group Capitulumipresent TEN re OR NE a MIN IIE 2 Capitulum'absent:!. 2.2. 2. No EEE 4 Area between micropylar plate and operculum distinctly concave. URN Te TAMA LL HOF DPI EE TE Phanocles group Area between micropylar plate and operculum round, not concave.......... 3 @apsuleslenethlequalswithlheisht eye.R E Caribbiopheromera group Capsule length considerably longer than heigth. Diapheromera-, Bacteria group Capsule elongated, glued to a surface ventrally............... >ermyle group Capsule not glued tojarsurfaces., i..e .e ee 5 Capsule laterally subquadrate, with irregular, broad elevations. . . Dyme group Capsule bullet-Like 2... 3.2 il Clonistria group A GENERIC REVISION OF PHASMATODEA 195 Phanocles group Genera. Alienobostra gen. n.; Phanocloidea gen. n.; Bostra Stal, 1875; Paraphanocles gen. n.; Phanocles Stäl, 1875. Characteristics. Large Diapheromerini. Scapus strikingly flat, roundly rectan- gular. d with vomer; body always shorter than in 9. Subgenital plate of 9 often projecting beyond abdomen and spear-like. Basitarsus always carinated, carina flat or produced like a high, triangular crest. Eggs with capitulum, micropylar plate inserted in an angle less than 90° to the operculum; concave between micropylar plate and operculum. Comments on the Phanocles group. Phanocloidea, Phanocles and Parapha- nocles are more closely related to each other than the other genera, as they all have a median segment that is longer than the metathorax. Bostra has a shorter median segment, but the d genitalia show relations to Paraphanocles. The shortest median segment is found in Alienobostra; but it is still much longer than in the following Bacteria group. Alienobostra seems to be isolated within this group: It is the only genus whose d subgenital plate is not bulbous but strikingly small and flat; the vomer has two appendices instead of one; the cerci are very long and specialized, as is known in the Diapheromera group only; the micropylar plate of the egg is only half as long as the capsule. Key to the genera of the Phanocles group dé: 1 Cerci distinctly longer than abdominal segment X.............. Alienobostra - Cercimotlonger than abdominalisesment nee. ye eis ee 2 2 Median segment at best as long as metathorax or shorter.............. Bostra È Median segment distinctly longer than metathorax. ...................... 3 3 Subgenital plate elongated in a hump or tooth posteroventrally............. 4 - Subgenital plate rounded posteroventrally, not elongated........ Phanocloidea - Abdominal segment X as wide as posterior half of IX............. Phanocles - Abdominal segment X widened posteriorly, wider than IX. ..... Paraphanocles PRO 1 Metathorax as long as or longer than median segment. ................... 2 - Mediantsesment longer than metathorax Re nuee eee ae 3 2 Mediansesment as1lonsjas1metathorax 22 2 2 ee Bostra - Median sesment shorter thanmetathorax, 2 yar 0... Re Alienobostra 3 Head depressed, distinctly longer than wide. ................. Phanocloidea - Head globose, only slightly longer than wide, armed..................... 4 - Abdominal tercites Viawath laterallobese ree RAEE Phanocles = Abdominal tergite VI without lateral lobes. ................. Paraphanocles Eggs: I Nicropylamplate/halfastlons'as capsule th Sep Alienobostra - Micropylanplate(distnetyi ongS h eee EEE ET 2 196 OLIVER ZOMPRO 2. Capsule flattened laterally, parallel-sided, surrounded by compact hairy SHUCIUTESS 4.1.1252 un e e ul OLI Bostra - Lateral margins of capsule not flattened, more globose.................... 3 3 @apsule puncturedi =... 22... ee IN 4 - Capsule differents ee eat. et CN CORO a Oe Phanocloidea - Capitulum with uniform, round impressions. ................ Paraphanocles - Eapitulum! with irresular impressions: Re RR SR Phanocles Phanocloidea gen. n. Figs 1-2, 70-71 Type-species. Bacteria nodulosa Redtenbacher, 1908: 416, by present desi- gnation. Bacteria: Burmeister, 1838: 563 (part.); Westwood, 1859: 20 (part.); Saussure, 1870: 151; Stal, 1875: 6, 14; 1875: 29; 1875: 11; Rehn, 1904: 61; Redtenbacher, 1908: 412; Shelford, 1909: 362; Zompro, 2000: 171. Material examined and species included. Bacteria aequatorialis Redtenbacher, 1908: 419: HT 2 nymph-5, Cachabi, Ecuador, circa 500ft, XI.96, Rosenburg [NHMW*]; Bacteria divergens Redtenbacher, 1908: 418: ST 2°, Cayenne, Prudhomme, 620/85 [MHNG*]; Bacteria freygessneri Redtenbacher, 1908: 421: HT ®, Guatemala, Mr. H. d. Saussure, 2/14 [MHNG*]; Mantis filiformes Fabricius, 1787: 227: HT 9%, no data [HMUG*]: Bacteria muricata Bur- meister, 1838: 564: ST d, Para, Sieber, 2, no data [ZMHB*]; Bacteria nodulosa Redtenbacher, 1908: 416: ST d, Museum Paris, Guyane Franc., F. Geay 1900 [NHMW*]; ST d, Cayenne, leg. Thorey, 805 [NHMW*]; ST dg, no data [SMNS*]; 4 88,4 2 2, several eggs: Culture O. Zompro [OZ*]; Bacteria redtenbacheri Brock, 1998c: 34, n. n. for Bacteria innocens Redten- bacher, 1908: 420: HT d, Callanga (Peru), Staudinger [NHMW*]; Bacteria rufopecta Redten- bacher, 1908: 416: HT d, Cayenne, Prudhomme, 620/85 [MHNG*]:; Bacteria satyr Redtenba- cher, 1908: ST ©, Brasil [SMTD*]: Bacteria schulthessi Redtenbacher, 1908: 419: HT 9, Ecuador [ETHZ*]: Bacteria segmentaria Redtenbacher, 1908: 420: HT d, Colombia ?, Mus. Dresden [NHMW*]: Diagnosis. d 2. A typical member of the Phanocles group. Phanocloidea differs from Alienobostra and Bostra in the longer median segment, from Phanocles and Paraphanocles in structure of the d genitalia and in the © in the flat, non-globose head. The egg is similar to that of Phanocles and Paraphanocles, but its capsule is not punctured. Description. Large Diapheromerini. Head distinctly longer than wide, vertex slightly elevated or swollen, armed or unarmed, eyes projecting hemispherically. Scapus flat, roundly rectangular, pedicellus subcylindrical, two-thirds (4) or half (9) as long and two-thirds as wide. Antennae exceeding end of abdominal segment IV (d) or III (2). Prothorax as long as head but considerably narrower. Mesonotum strongly elongated, slightly narrower (4) or of same width (9) as prothorax, smooth in à, smooth, granulated, tuberculated or spinose in ©. Metathorax about one-third as long as mesothorax, equal or different in structure. Profemora curved basally, triangular in cross section, laminate. Meso- and metafemora trapezoid in cross section, sometimes with small ventroapical spines, smooth, serrated or bilobed. Tibiae distinctly longer than femora. Probasitarsus distinctly (4) or slightly (9) longer than following seg- ments combined. Mesobasitarsus as long as, metabasitarsus longer than (d ) or as long as (2) following segments combined. Basitarsi carinate to cristate dorsally. Median A GENERIC REVISION OF PHASMATODEA 197 segment much (4) or slightly (2) longer than metathorax. Abdominal segment II shorter than median segment. Segment II longer (6) or slightly shorter than (9 ) III; III to V increasingly longer, VI shorter than V, VII shorter than VI, latter widest in ©. Segment VIII of d dilated posteriorly, IX wider than VIII or X, narrowed posteriorly. Segment X subquadrate, emarginated posteriorly. Segment IX longer than VIII, latter as long as X. Cerci short, directed downwards, not longer than X. Subgenital plate bulgy. Vomer produced. Segments VIII to X of 2 narrower than previous segments, all of equal width. Segment VIII longer than IX, latter and X of similar length. Segment X quadrate dorsally, posterior margin with an emargination (4). Cerci shorter than X, sligthly surpassing X by less than its half-length. In 2, praeopercular organ produced, subgenital plate in posterior half with a ventromedian carina slightly to considerably surpassing the tip of abdomen. Obviously some d d of this genus possess more or less well-developed tegmina and alae. Derivatio nominis. Phanocloidea mirrors the close relationship to Phanocles Stal. Distribution. Northern South America. Comments on the genus. This genus includes many of the species published under the name "Bacteria". Phanocloidea includes both apterous 4 4 and those with fully developed wings. The erstwhile genus Bacteria auct. is heterogenous without any doubt, with the predictible result that, along with further revisions at the species level, it will be splitted. Phanocloidea is but a first step, for its type is known from both sexes and the egg 1s documented as well. For further comments see Bacteria. Different characteristics vary between the species of Bacteria auct., yet the known material does not allow for significant morphological tendencies to be revealed. The head can be oblong depressed or the vertex elevated, with long spines or horns or totally unarmed, the thorax smooth to prominently spinose, the metatarsi dorsally with a small carina or a prominent, triangular crest. Zompro (2000) presents a SEM study of the egg of Phanocloidea nodulosa (Redtenbacher, 1908) and the first description of the female. This work includes figures of the adults. Phanocles Stal, 1875 Figs 3- 5, 72-75 Phanocles: Stal, 1875: 28; Bacteria: Redtenbacher, 1908: 412 (part.); Shelford, 29026301773 Type-species. Bacteria burkartii Saussure, 1868: 65, by subsequent designation of Kirby, 1904: 353. Material examined and species included. Phanocles burkartii (Saussure, 1868: 65): 2 ©, Mexico, Soconusco (Chiapas) 1200m üb. Meer, Herm.-Hans Kolow, 6.7.1900, 1 egg ex ovipositor [ZMUH*; OZ *]; 2, Mexico, Deyrolle [NHMW*]; Bacteria sartoriana Kaup & Heyden, 1871: 18, 29, pl. 1: 5: HT 2, Mexico, (Sartorius) v. Heyden. n. syn. of Phanocles burkartii (Saussure) [SMFD*]; Phanocles n. sp. Hennemann i. pr. HT 6, Bred England, Essex, Hockley, 1992. PSG 47, AJE. Harman, PT 9, Bred England, Essex, Hockley, 1991. AJE. Harman. Originally Costa Rica 1989 [Coll. F. Hennemann*]. 198 OLIVER ZOMPRO Complementary description. d 2. Head subglobose, only slightly longer than wide. Eyes projecting hemispherically, two humps or tubercles behind eyes. Scapus flat, rectangular with rounded edges, pedicellus one-third as long and two-thirds as wide, antennae projecting beyond abdominal segment IV (4) or reaching the anterior half of II (2). Prothorax as long as head. Mesothorax strongly elongated, narrower than prothorax and smooth (4) or as wide as prothorax and granulated to spinose (2). Metathorax structured as mesothorax, a little longer than prothorax. Profemora curved basally, triangular in cross section, edges laminate. Meso- and metafemora trapezoid in cross section, mesofemora in anterior quarter with small lobes ventrolaterally, with a row of (sometimes indistinct) spines ventro-apically (at least in 9). Tibiae considerably longer than femora. Basitarsi of d with a low carina, of 9 with a high, triangular carina. Probasitarsus longer than (6) or as long as, mesobasitarsus as long as (6) or shorter than, metabasitarsus as long as (d) or shorter than (2) following segments combined. Abdominal segment II shorter than median segment, segment III longer than II, in d length very slightly increasing from III to V, segment VI as long as II, VII half as long as V; VIII to X combined as long as V; VIII as long as IX; X two-thirds of IX. Segment VIII equally dilated, IX before middle abruptly narrowed, posterior half as wide as X; latter slightly emarginated posteriorly. Cerci shorter than X, slightly curved, directed downwards. Subgenital plate prominent, posteriorly elongated into an appen- dix, flattened posteromedially. In 9, segments III to V increasingly longer, VI as long as IV, with lobes posterolaterally, segment VII as long as II. Praeopercular organ produced. Segments VIII to X combined as long as VI; segments IX and X of equal length, VIII considerably longer. Cerci straight, slightly projecting beyond segment X. Subgenital plate broad, distinctly projecting beyond tip of abdomen. Egg. Capsule irregularly oval, with punctured structure. Micropylar plate elon- gated, longer than two-thirds of capsule. Operculum oval. Capitulum smooth, high, with several irregular impressions. Distribution. Central America. Comments on the genus. The drawings by Saussure (1870: 151, pl. 3: 6) and Shelford (1909: 363, pl. 7: 3b) show the © without lateral lobes, despite these being mentioned in the original diagnosis; consequently all following authors erroneously synonymized Phanocles with Bacteria, including some species which now belong to Phanocloidea n. g. The lobes are convergent to those in the Oriental genus Pharnacia Stal, 1877 and are in fact of generic value. The genus is easiest to separate from Phanocloidea by the posteroventrally elongated subgenital plate of the d and the globose head of the 9; the egg by its punctured structure. Possibly some d d of this genus are winged (as in Phanocloidea or some species of the erstwhile Bacteria). The complementary description above has been complemented by the d of a new species from Costa Rica (Hennemann, in press). Paraphanocles gen. n. Figs 6-7, 76-77, 124-125 Bacteria: Redtenbacher, 1908: 412 (part.). Type-species. Mantis keratosqueleton Olivier, 1792: 639, by present design- ation.