A DArk TrAce SIGMUND FreUD ON THe SeNSe OF GUILT A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 1 15/06/09 14:37 FIGUreS OF THe UNcONScIOUS 8 editorial Board PHILIPPe VAN HAUTe (Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands) TOMAS GeySkeNS (Catholic University Leuven, Belgium) PAUL MOyAerT (Catholic University Leuven, Belgium) MONIqUe DAVID-MéNArD (Université Paris VII – Diderot, France) VLADIMIr SAFATLe (University of Sao Paolo, Brazil) cHArLeS SHePHerDSON (State University of New York at Albany, USA) A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 2 15/06/09 14:37 A Dark Trace Sigmund Freud on the Sense of Guilt Herman Westerink A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 3 15/06/09 14:37 The translation was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Original title: Het schuldgevoel bij Freud. een duister spoor. Authorized translation from the Dutch language edition published by Uitgeverij Boom, Amsterdam. © 2005 Dutch language edition by Uitgeverij Boom, Amsterdam (The Netherlands). © 2009 english language edition by Leuven University Press / Universitaire Pers Leuven / Presses Universitaires de Louvain. Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium) All rights reserved. except in those cases expressly determined by law, no part of this publication may be multiplied, saved in an automated datafile or made public in any way whatsoever without the express prior written consent of the publishers ISBN 978 90 5867 754 9 D/ 2009 / 1869 / 26 NUr: 777 cover: Geert de koning Lay-out: Friedemann BVBA Translation from Dutch: Language centre, University of Groningen A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 4 15/06/09 14:37 Contents Introduction IX chapter 1. Carmen and other representations 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 “Our bugles sounding the retreat” 2 1.3 Moral treatment 7 1.4 A morally disturbing case 9 1.5 Moral character 11 1.6 A defensive ego 14 1.7 Self-reproach 19 1.8 Moral judgements 22 1.9 Seduction and self-reproach 25 1.10 Stories 30 1.11 Assessment 34 chapter 2. Dark traces 37 2.1 Introduction 37 2.2 your guilt isn’t the same as mine 38 2.3 The dead kill 43 2.4 “Thus conscience doth make cowards of us all” 46 2.5 The dark trace of an old guilt 47 2.6 “My ‘ought’ set before me” 52 2.7 Primary and secondary processes 55 chapter 3. repressed desires 57 3.1 Introduction 57 3.2 Formation and utilization of sexuality 58 3.3 Weaknesses in the system 64 3.4 Attack and defence 67 3.5 Dominated by guilt 70 3.6 cultural morality 74 3.7 Hostility toward the father 77 V A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 5 15/06/09 14:37 chapter 4. Applied psychoanalysis 87 4.1 Introduction 87 4.2 The choices of Freud’s followers 90 4.3 A single principle 98 4.4 The prohibition behind the imperative 102 4.5 Ambivalent feelings 105 4.6 Projection 112 4.7 conscience 115 4.8 Systems of thought 117 4.9 An ancient guilt 122 chapter 5. In the depths 139 5.1 Introduction 139 5.2 The depth surfaces 142 5.3 The downfall of self-reproach 147 5.4 “The youth sees himself as an idol” 150 5.5 Self-regard 153 5.6 Feelings of hate 156 5.7 When erotism and sense of guilt go hand in hand 157 5.8 The sense of guilt must be set at rest 162 5.9 “Becoming is impossible without destruction” 167 chapter 6. Analyses of the ego 175 6.1 Introduction 175 6.2 “The Sphinx of ancient legend” 176 6.3 “A psychological crowd” 177 6.4 emotional bonds 180 6.5 Identification: from Oedipus complex to sense of guilt 182 6.6 “The only pre-psychoanalytic thinker” 187 6.7 Towards an unconscious sense of guilt 195 6.8 The Oedipus complex and the superego 197 6.9 Unconscious sense of guilt 201 6.10 The problem of masochism 203 6.11 conclusion 206 VI A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 6 15/06/09 14:37 chapter 7. Anxiety and helplessness 207 7.1 Introduction 207 7.2 Birth and the feeling of guilt 208 7.3 castration anxiety and the sense of guilt 212 7.4 Helpless and dissatisfied 217 7.5 Illusion and science 219 7.6 Dogma and compulsion 221 7.7 critique 222 7.8 The apologetics of a godless Jew 224 7.9 considerations 227 chapter 8. Synthesis and a new debate 229 8.1 Introduction 229 8.2 “The man of fate” 230 8.3 An instinctual character 231 8.4 La sensation religieuse 233 8.5 Impossible happiness 236 8.6 Hostility to civilization 242 8.7 Loving thy neighbour 245 8.8 Schiller and Goethe: The Philosophers 246 8.9 Struggle 251 8.10 Anxiety and the sense of guilt once again 254 8.11 Drive renunciation 256 8.12 Discontents 258 8.13 A new debate 261 8.14 considerations 274 chapter 9. Great men 275 9.1 Introduction 275 9.2 Moses the egyptian 276 9.3 Akhenaton and monotheism 279 9.4 The kadesh compromise 282 9.5 What is a great man? 284 9.6 St Paul 289 9.7 The sense of guilt and the return of the repressed 292 9.8 Assessments 295 concluding considerations 297 Literature 303 Index 315 VII A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 7 15/06/09 14:37 A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 8 15/06/09 14:37 Introduction “Psychoanalysis has never claimed to provide a complete theory of human mentality in general.”1 Freud wrote these words in 1914, shortly after his break with Jung. It is indeed true that he never concerned himself with developing an all-embracing system, but rather moved from the analysis of patients to areas of special attention: repression, dreams, the unconscious, sexuality and resistance. Sense of guilt also constituted an area of interest in his work. In his search for an explanation for and the origins of sense of guilt it appears that he did not attempt to construct a definitive theory here either. Despite returning repeatedly to this topic, Freud never wrote a systematic article about this feeling.2 When touching upon sense of guilt, which he did often, he mapped it and indicated its connections to other psychic phenomena and with culture. His point of departure was the individual, and this is striking, not so much against the background of his interests and patient analyses, but because of the dominant tendencies in psychology and philosophy, inasmuch as these dealt with theorizing about man and mind. In the nineteenth century, science (and hence psychology, inasmuch as one may call it a science) tended towards system development which explained “everything”. Psyche, 1846, by carl Gustav carus, Philosophie des Unbewußten [Philosophy of the Unconscious], 1869, by eduard von Hartmann, and also Wilhelm Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie [Folk-Psychology], 1905-1920, are good examples of this. Accordingly Hartmann wrote in the introduction to his book that he saw it as his task to realize a synthesis of the great philosophical systems into a monistic unity.3 This romantic tradition of great systems built around an unambiguous principle did not fail to have its effect on psychoanalysis. Jung, Adler and later rank, too, are in essence psychoanalysts who express this tradition of system construction and monism. Freud repeatedly distanced himself from these tendencies, not only because there is always an individual case to disprove any system, but also because he believed humans are fundamentally in conflict, because every analytic insight achieved appears also to cloak something else, and because the therapist is never in a position objectively to plumb the deepest emotional depths. Nevertheless, he is in a certain way very much in the tradition of the great theorists. Whether one considers Darwin’s The Descent of Man, Frazer’s The Golden Bough or Breasted’s The Dawn of Conscience, these are all comprehensive works which resonate in Freud’s work. Put another way, although he was certainly interested in “everything”, he did not explain it all by reducing it to a single principle. It 1 S. Freud, On the History of the Psychoanalytic Movement, SE XIV, p.50. 2 “Sigmund Freud never actually wrote a book dedicated entirely to guilt, but the various comments he made on the subject throughout his work make him the true initiator of the study of the sense of guilt and certainly the first person to approach the question systematically.” R. Speziale-Bagliacca, Guilt. Revenge, Remorse and Responsibility after Freud, Brunner-routledge, Hove/New york, 2004, p.1. 3 e. von Hartmann, Philosophie des Unbewußten. Versuch einer Weltanschauung, carl Duncker’s Ver- lag, Berlin, 1869, pp.1-4. IX A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 9 15/06/09 14:37 A Dark Trace would be better to say that he placed the unique individual before a background of changing and varied cultures and religions. Freud does not describe systems but areas of attention. With the exception of The Interpretation of Dreams there is not one book which exhaustively explores a single phenomenon. This is why Freud preferred to speak about “fundaments”, “types”, “speculations”, “fantastic hypotheses” and “nuclear complexes” and used words like “fragment”, “project”, “outline”, “formulations”, “observations”, “notes” or “further remarks” in the titles of some of his works. He preferred to direct his attention to the victims (neurotics) of modern culture, to the decisive (small) events which changed history and the great men who were able to influence history. My study on sense of guilt in Freud’s work is not intended to construct or reconstruct a conclusive theory. I am concerned in the first place with describing sense of guilt as an area of attention. My thesis is that sense of guilt is not a secondary theme which appears primarily in Freud’s later work but that in fact it plays a fundamental role in his earlier psychoanalytic work.4 It is via the analysis of sense of guilt that he came to understand the importance of repressed wishes and desires. It is via the analysis of sense of guilt that he discovered the Oedipus complex and the meaning of the ambivalence of love and hate. It appears to be an affect omnipresent in the tension between passions, desires and repressed feelings on the one hand and a censuring, accusatory morality on the other. Freud was not only able to research the nature and meaning of that repression via sense of guilt, but was also able to inquire after the origin of morality in both its individual and cultural guises. In this study I map the attention Freud paid to sense of guilt and sketch the development of his thought on this issue and the meaning it has for other central topics in his oeuvre. This is not an exhaustive technical analysis, nor is it a clinical debate with Freud. Instead I shall emphasize Freud’s debates. We shall see that the great debates he had with students (Jung, rank, klein) were debates in which sense of guilt played a prominent role. His thinking about sense of guilt can largely be described by means of these debates. I shall also emphasize the important influences on Freud’s thinking and his use of others’ writings. These choices clearly demonstrate the importance of our field of inquiry. It is precisely this approach – Freud in debate – which enables us to perceive his thoughts on sense of guilt more clearly than we would were we to limit ourselves to his oeuvre alone. I believe this approach provides clarification of or corrections to many contributions to Freud studies which limit themselves to technical analyses of his work. 4 In much literature on Freud sense of guilt is only treated in the context of the Oedipus complex which only became a central topic in Freud’s writings from Totem and Taboo onwards, and especially in the 1920s and 1930s. An example of can be found in Grinberg’s study on guilt and depression, one of the few studies that explicitly concerns sense of guilt in Freudian (and kleinian) thought. His study starts of with an exegesis of Totem and Taboo; earlier writings on sense of guilt are hardly elaborated upon. L. Grinberg, Guilt and Depression, karnac Books, New york/London, 1992. X A_Dark_Trace_280509.indd 10 15/06/09 14:37