http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf Sri Sankara’s Vivekachudamani Translated by Achyarya Pranipata Chaitanya Revised & Edited, with an Introduction by Satinder Dhiman 1 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf Sri Sankara’s Vivekachudamani Devanagari Text, Transliteration, Word-for-Word Meaning, and a Lucid English Translation By Acharya Pranipata Chaitanya (Tiruchengode Chinmaya Mission, Tamil Nadu, India) Revised & Edited, with an Introduction by Satinder Dhiman, Ed.D. 2 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf Vivekachudamani: The Crest-Jewel of Discrimination The Vivekachudamani, literally "The Crest-Jewel of Discrimination," is perhaps the most famous non-commentarial work of Sankara that expounds Vedanta philosophy. Having written pioneering and monumental commentaries on triple cannon (prasthanatraya) comprising the Upanishads, Bhagavad Gita and Brahma Sutras, Sankara also composed several sub-texts in simple Sanskrit, called prakaranagranthas (philosophical treatises), with a view to reaching the message of Vedanta to common people. The Vivekachudamani, as its name signifies, is the crown jewel of such prarkarana texts. The Question of Authorship of Vivekachudamani On grounds of style and terminology, some modern scholars have disputed the authorship of Vivekachudamani as ascribed to Sankara. Comans (1996, p. xvi), for example, finds the style of the verses of Vivekachudamani to be ―highly poetic‖ in contrast to the vigorous style of the verses in UpadeshaSahasri, a work that is universally acknowledged as Sankara‘s composition. He also finds the verses commending the nirvikalpasamadhi ―at variance with the minimal importance Sankara gives to samadhi practices in his other works.‖ He concludes that Vivekachudamani ―is more than likely to be a composition of some later Sankaracharya, perhaps connected to the Sringeripitham.‖ (p. xvi) Alston (1997, p. 297) remarks that the reference to ‗powers of concealment and projection‘ attributable to ignorance (verses 110-117) is not found elsewhere in Sankara‘s commentarial works. Alston believes that the references to the ‗bliss of the Brahman‘—which occur in nearly a fifth of the verses of Vivekachudamani—are quite sparse in UpadeshaSahasri. Alston feels that the style and flavor of Vivekachudamani is reminiscent of a vedantic work called Yoga Vasishtha. Ingalls (cited in Potter, 1998, p. 335) states that ‗the author of Vivekachudamani makes an absolute equation of the waking and dream states after the fashion of Gaudapada. Sankara may liken the two to each other, but he is careful to distinguish 3 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf them.‘ Furthermore, Ignalls, like Mayeda, believes that Sankara does not use indescribability (anirvacaniya) as a qualification of ignorance (avidya). Most interestingly, Hacker (cited in Potter, 1998, p. 335), whose criteria these scholars use to dismiss Vivekachudamani as spurious, accepts the work as genuine based on the colophon. Professor John Grimes provides a balanced assessment of Vivekachudamani according to the Hacker criteria step by step and states that ―a strong case can be made that Vivekachudamani is a genuine work of Sankara‘s and that it differs from in certain respects from his other works in that it addresses itself to a different audience and has a different emphasis and purpose.‖ He avers that ―there is no rule that insists that a prakarana treatise should be consistent with a commentary.‖ (2004, p. 13) We are inclined to agree with Professor Grimes‘ balanced assessment. Vivekachudamani is an ancillary treatise of Sankara addressed to different audience with a specific emphasis and purpose. Nevertheless, we submit that, overall, the work is consistent with and does not deviate from Sankara‘s fundamental Vedantic stance: That the Brahman (Absolute) is One only, without a second; that it is absolutely one with the Atman (Self); that the many-fold world of appearance is non-real (mithya); that the Brahman (Ultimate Reality) is of the nature of satyam-jyanam-anantam—Existence, Knowledge, Infinite; that self-less actions play preparatory role in purifying the mind to receive the wisdom of Self-Knowledge; that ignorance (avidya) alone is the cause of human bondage; Self-Knowledge (atam-jnana) alone is the means to liberation; and that liberation (mukti or moksha) is not possible until one realizes or attains the knowledge of oneness of the Atman and the Brahman (brahmatamekattvabodham). However that may be, Vivekachudamani remains a vade mecum of quintessential Vedanta theory and practice. As Swami DayanandaSaraswati, a pre- eminent modern teacher of Vedanta, has observed: ―I do not think we lose anything even if the authorship is attributed to any other Sankaracharya of one of the various Sankara-mathas.‖ (1997, p. 1) 4 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf A Note on Translation No translation, howsoever accurate, can truly capture the pristine beauty of the original. Sanskrit is the oldest and the most systematic language of the world. Its vast structure, refined construction, and rythymic compactness is hard to duplicate in any translation. In preparing this translation, we have consulted translations by Chatterji (1932), Johnston (1946), Prabhavananda and Isherwood (1947), Swami Madhavananda (1966), Swami Chinmyananda (1970), Swami Turiyananda (1987), Alston (1997), P. Sankaranarayanan (English translation of the Sanskrit commentary of Sri CandrasekharaBharati of Sringeri, 1999), and Grimes (2004). We have also consulted the Hindi translation by Munilal (1945) and Talks on Vivekachudamani by Swami Akhandananda (1976), Swami Ranganathananda (2008), and Swami DayanandaSaraswati (1997) to clarify and render certain words of deepest philosophical import. We have greatly benefitted from their work and recount our sincere debt to them all. There are at least 9 English translations of this work in English already in print. Why add another one? We believe that this translation fulfills a very special need in Sri Sankaracharya‘s literature. As far as we know, this is the only version that contains the Sanskrit original in Devanagari, Romanized verses, word for word meaning, and a lucid English rendering. We have tried our level best to stay true to the original, both in intent and purpose, while at the same time presenting a translation that is at once idiomatic, expressive, and free-flowing. We have also tried our best to be present our renderings in a gender-neutral way. It is not intended so much for scholars as it is for spiritual aspirants desirous of a faithful yet readable translation of this important treatise of Advaita Vedanta. 5 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf Advaita Vedanta: An Introduction ―On the tree of Indian wisdom, there is no fairer flower than the Upanishads and no finer fruit than the Vedanta philosophy.‖ ~Paul Deussen, Outline of the Vedanta System, p. vii. "In his short life of thirty-two years Sankara achieved that union of sage and saint, of wisdom and kindliness, which characterizes the loftiest type of man produced in India. Sankara establishes the source of his philosophy at a remote and subtle point never quite clearly visioned again until, a thousand years later, Immanuel Kant wrote his Critique of Pure Reason." ~Will Durant, Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, pp. 546 - 547. Introduction Vedanta is the most widely known system of Indian philosophy, both in the East and the West. Advaita Vedanta is the non-dualistic system of Vedanta expounded primarily by an 8th century Indian philosopher called Sankara. Advaita means not two or non-dual—the One only, without a second. It postulates one single reality, Brahman, as the absolute or ultimate truth of the world. It then equates this reality with the sole reality of our own self, called Atman. The goal of Vedanta is to establish the reality and identity of Atman-Brahman. Though strictly not its founder, Sankara was undoubtedly the greatest expounder and systematizer of Advaita. Karl Jaspers (1883-1969) the famous Austrian existentialist philosopher, once told Professor K. Satchidananda Murthy that, 'there is no metaphysics superior to that of Sankara.' The entire philosophy of Sankara can be summed up in the following statement: Brahma satyam, jaganmithya, jivobrahmaivanaparah: Brahman alone is real; the world is non-real; and the individual Self is essentially not- different from Brahman. This is the quintessence of Sankara’s metaphysics. Strictly speaking, Sankara's philosophy is called Kevaladvaita or absolute monism or non-dualism which can be summed up as follows: 6 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf The Absolute or the Brahman alone is real and the individual self is the Absolute. Brahman is undifferentiated Pure Consciousness, devoid of parts, attributes, form, changes or limitations whatsoever. It is self-luminous and all-pervading and one only, without a second. The Atmam (Self) is ever-free, pure consciousness. The empirical world is non-real, an appearance born out of Maya (illusion) or avidya (ignorance). The be-all and end-all of Advaita is the absolute non-difference of Atman and Brahman. The term ―Vedanta‖ literally means ―end of Vedas‖ (the sacred books of knowledge of Hinduism). It refers, within Indian philosophical tradition, to the teachings of the Upanisads, the Brahma-sutras, and the Bhagavad Gita. Advaita Vedanta is the non-dualistic system of Vedanta expounded primarily by an 8th century Indian philosopher called Sankara (Deutsch, 1973, p. 3). Advaita means not two, One only without a second (Ekamevaadvitiyam). The basic truth of Advaita is the Self which is of the nature of pure consciousness. This truth is self-existent and cannot be denied, for to deny consciousness is to actually prove its existence! The experiential realization of this truth is the goal of Advaita. Advaita Vedanta postulates one single reality, Brahman, as the ultimate truth of the world. It then equates this reality with the sole reality of our individual self, called Atman. Advaita says that One alone exists, and the rest is all superimposition on that One, due to ignorance. Through a systematic inquiry into the nature of our self and the world around us, Advaita arrives at the position that the self which is of the nature of pure consciousness is constant and therefore real, while the phenomena constituting the world is constantly changing and therefore unreal. It finally concludes that, in essence, our essential nature (and the nature of the universe) is ‗Existence-Knowledge- Bliss Absolute‘—satchitananda. The most unique feature of advaita analysis, however, is that it takes into account all three states of our existence, avastatraya—waking, dream, and deep sleep—since we have experiences during all three states. Advaita believes that in order to obtain a complete picture of our existential reality, we need to include evidence from all three states. This is the phenomenology of consciousness according to advaita. This subject will be broached in greater detail later in this essay. 7 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf Dream World of Brahman's Dream and Awakening! One of the key questions in Vedanta is: If Brahman is One only, without a second, how do we experience the manifold world? Vedanta‘s short answer is that avidya-led Maya "covers" the One and "projects" the Many. These are spoken of as the veiling power (avarnasakti) and the projecting power (vikshepasakti) of the Cosmic Grand illusion called Maya. Actually, Maya is Brahman's dream. In truth, only One, non- dual Reality is All there is. It is called Brahman because it is all-pervasive. It is intrinsically Real, self-effulgent, infinite, undifferentiated Pure Consciousness. When we awake to the identity of the Self with the Brahman (Brahmatamekattavabodhana), the dream is over. The show, however, continues, as before. Only our identification with a particular actor's role is gone forever. This is called ParamPada, the Supreme State of unalloyed Bliss! This state is already ours always in a "general" way. When due to the utmost Grace of God/Guru/Self, the Self-Knowledge dawns, we awake to it in a "special" way. The phrase Atman=Brahman or I=That, capture the essence of the immanent (Self) and the transcendent (Brahman) Reality. Humanity has not yet conceived a more lofty conception of its position in the universe. Ultimate Goal of Advaita Vedanta: Liberation through Self-Knowledge You are indeed the supreme Self but due to your association with ignorance you find yourself under the bondage of the not-self, which is the sole cause of the cycle of births and deaths. All the effects of ignorance, root and branch, are burnt down by the fire of knowledge, which arises from discrimination between these two—the Self and the not-Self. ~Vivekachudamani, verse 47. There is no liberation for a peson of mere book-knowledge, howsoever well-read in the philosophy of Vedanta, so long as one does not give up false identification with the body, sense-organs, etc., which are unreal. ~Vivekachudamani, verse 162. These verses admirably sums up the Advaita teachings of Sankara. In Advaita, the false identification of the Self with the non-Self is considered to be the root cause of Samsara. When through self-inquiry this false identification removed, it is called liberation. 8 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf The basic truth of Advaita is the Self which is of the nature of pure consciousness. This truth is self-existent and cannot be denied, for to deny one‘s self is to actually prove its existence! The experiential realization of this truth is the goal of Advaita. In the Vedantic scheme of things, there is no difference between self- knowledge and self-realization, for to know oneself is to realize oneself. Since the ultimate goal of Advaita is to attain liberation through Self-Knowledge, the following section presents the basic tenants of Advaita as steps leading to the liberating knowledge of one‘s own essential Self. Why search for Self-Knowledge? That the question of Self-Knowledge has been explored since time immemorial attests to its perennial interest and universal value. Long before Socrates‘ injunction, Know Thyself, Indian seers of yore have been exploring for long the question of the truth in man and the universe. Self-knowledge is fundamental since all other knowledge is dependent upon this knowledge. It is important for us to know who we are so as to formulate a correct perspective in relation to other things. Without first knowing who we are, we can never understand truly where we stand in the cosmic scheme of things. In Indian philosophy, ignorance of self (or lack of self-knowledge) is seen as the root cause of all problems in life. Due to ignorance of our true self and consequent lack of correct valuation of things, we develop undue attachment to the objects of our desire, which becomes the cause of much of our anxiety and stress. Thus, without knowing our real nature—the truth of our existence—we can never overcome grief or find real peace. In the following pages, we will explore three questions: 1. Who am I? or What is Self-knowledge? 2. How to attain Self-knowledge? 3. How does a Self-realized person act? The second question—how to attain Self-Knowledge—will be explored first and during this process the question of Self-Knowledge or Self-Realization will be addressed. As stated earlier, in the Vedantic scheme of things, there is no difference 9 http://www.advaitin.net/PranipataChaitanya/Vivekachudamani%20eBook%20FinalFinal1.pdf between self-knowledge and self-realization, for to know oneself is to realize oneself. The essay will conclude with some illustrations regarding how a person established in self-knowledge acts. How to attain Self-Knowledge? Four Qualities of a Seeker of Self-knowledge or Truth In an opening verse of the AstavakraSamhita, the sage Astavakra sums up all the prerequisites to spiritual liberation as follows: ―If you aspire after liberation, shun the objects of the senses as poison and seek forbearance, sincerity, kindness, contentment, and truthfulness as nectar.‖ Like all proper systems of self-inquiry, Advaita Vedanta lays down four prerequisites or qualities for a seeker after Self-knowledge, as follows: 1. Discrimination—viveka—between the real and the unreal 2. Renunciation—vairagya—of the unreal 3. Six Virtues/Treasures—shatsampatti—of self-control 4. Longing for liberation—mumukshuta Discrimination. The first quality of a seeker of self-knowledge is the ability to discriminate the real (eternal) from the unreal (non-eternal)—nitya’nitavastuviveka. The truth regarding all Vedantic propositions is established on the triple basis of scripture, reasoning, and direct experience (sruti-yukti-anubhuti). The scriptures declare that all that is subject to change cannot be ultimately real and bring abiding happiness. A careful analysis of our experience regarding the objects of our desire shows that nothing that is created is permanent or stable. Everything we desire—name, fame, wealth, and success--are subject to change and consequently, sooner or later, brings misery and grief in its wake. Thus our experience tells us that hankering after what is transitory and unstable cannot bring us lasting happiness. The more we discriminate thusly the more we realize that the true abiding joy cannot be found in transient sense objects. So, we should stop running after false goods. The practice of discrimination between the real and the unreal frees us from the bondage of ignorance and delusion and thereby spares us from much existential agony. 10