ZOOSYSTEMATICA ROSSICA, 18(2): 278–284 25 DECEMBER 2009 New to Russia and poorly known species of the genus Aphodius (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV L.A. Akhmetova & A.V. Frolov, Laboratory of Insect Systematics, Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya Emb. 1, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Aphodius (Agoliinus) guttatus, A. (Chilothorax) clathratus, and A. (Aphodaulacus) kizeritskyi are recorded from Russia for the first time. Aphodius (Agoliinus) amurensis previously known only from the type locality is found in the Lazo Nature Reserve (Russian Far East). All species are diagnosed and illustrated. Comments on diagnostic characters, distribution and bionomics are given. Key words: new records, diagnostic characters, Russia, Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Aphodius INTRODUCTION was made with ArcGIS 9.1 software. Local- ity coordinates for the map were taken from Aphodius Illiger, 1798 is one of the larg- specimen labels, available atlases and the est beetle genera in the Russian fauna and GNS database (http://earthinfo.nga.mil/ the major group to control mammal dung html/index.html). The photos were made and dung-breeding flies. Yet our knowledge with a Leica DFC290 digital camera and a of this genus is still poor in many aspects. Leica MZ9.5 stereoscopic microscope. Par- Even a complete list of species recorded tially focused serial images were combined from Russia is not published. Almost every in Helicon Focus software (Helicon Soft expedition to the southern Volga Region Ltd.) to produce completely focused pho- and southern Far East of Russia, aimed at tographs. collecting scarab beetles, yields new spe- cies to regional faunas or other important Aphodius (Agoliinus) amurensis findings. In the present contribution, three Iablokoff-Khnzorian, 1972 species of the four (A. guttatus Eschscholtz, (Figs 1, 10) 1823, A. clathratus Reitter, 1892, and A. kizeritskyi Frolov, 2002) are recorded from Holotype. Male; Russia, Primorskiy Terr., Russia for the first time. Some of them were Shkotovo Distr., Village of Peyshula, 43°37´N 132°31´E, 15 Aug. 1971; IZE. poorly or not illustrated, and no data about Paratypes. Two females; same data as holo- their biology were available. type; IZE. Additional material. Five males and five fe- MATERIAL AND METHODS males; Russia, Primorskiy Terr.: Lazo Distr., Lazo Nature Reserve, 42°59´N 134°1´E, 6 Aug. 2008; The examined material is deposited at coll. A. Frolov and L. Akhmetova; ZIN. the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy Diagnosis. Aphodius amurensis is similar of Sciences, St. Petersburg (ZIN); Institute to A. piceus Gyllenhal, 1808, but can be sep- of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of arated from it by the shape of the parameres Armenia, Yerevan (IZE); Zoological Muse- and their feebly sclerotized processes (Figs um of Moscow State University (ZMMU); 9, 10), convex elytral intervals, especially in and in the collection of Alexander Ivanov, apical parts, more convex and shorter body, Ekaterinburg (AIC). The distribution map and angulate clypeus (Figs 1, 2). © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS 279 Figs 1–4. Aphodius, general view (1, 2, 4, male; 3, female). 1, A. amurensis (holotype); 2, A. piceus; 3, A. guttatus (lectotype); 4, A. guttatus. © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284 280 L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS Comments. Aphodius amurensis was de- and with the description of A. guttatus given scribed from a small sample collected in by Gordon and Skelley (2007). Shkotovo District of southern Primorskiy The specimens from Kamchatka differ Territory (Iablokov-Khnzorian, 1972), and from the lectotype in the body coloura- no more specimens were known until re- tion. The head and pronotum of the lecto- cently we found the species in the Lazo Na- type are dark brown with paler sides; the ture Reserve. The new series was collected legs are brown; the elytra are brown with from fresh dung of Japanese deer (Cervus small yellowish maculae on elytral bases, nippon Temminck, 1838) in a mixed forest. humeral umbones, and in the distal half of Probably A. amurensis is widely distributed third to fifth elytral intervals (Fig. 3). The in Primorskiy Territory, but its range is lim- specimens from Kamchatka are darker with ited to areas with stable deer populations. dark brown to almost black upper side of In the same locality, in older deer dung, the body and dark brown legs, and with the we found numerous second and third instar elytra having only one small yellowish mac- Aphodius larvae. These larvae have charac- ula in apical part of each elytron (Fig. 4). teristic head pattern similar to that of Eu- Such a variability in colouration lies with- ropean A. nemoralis Erichson, 1848 (Frolov, ing the range of interspecific variations unpublished data), also a member of the commonly found in many Aphodius species. subgenus Agoliinus Schmidt, 1913. We be- Elytral pattern varies considerably in North lieve the larvae collected in Lazo Natural American specimens, and yellowish maculae Reserve belong to A. amurensis but failed to are reduced in some individuals (Gordon & rear them to adults. Skelley, 2007). Therefore we suppose that the specimens from Kamchatka and Aleu- Aphodius (Agoliinus) guttatus tian Islands are conspecific. Eschscholtz, 1823 (Figs 3, 4, 8) Aphodius (Aphodaulacus) kizeritskyi Frolov, 2002 Type material examined. Lectotype. Female; “USA, Unalaska”; ZMMU. Type material examined. Holotype. Male; Additional material. One male and two fe- Turkmenistan, Duzu-Olum, Sumbar River, about males; Russia, Kamchatka Terr.: Karaginskiy I., 10 km upstream of Sharloun, 21 Oct. 1902; ZIN. Village of Yagodnoe, 27 July 2008; coll. O. Khru- Paratypes. One female; Turkmenistan: Imam leva; ZIN. Baba, 36°45´N 62°28´E, 3 Oct. 1899; coll. V. Diagnosis. Aphodius guttatus can be dis- Kizeritsky; ZIN. One female; Turkmenistan: tinguished from other species of the subge- Iolotan´, 37°18´N 62°21´E, 12 Nov. 1912; coll. V. nus Agoliinus distributed in Russia by an Kizeritsky; ZIN. elytral pattern with more or less developed Additional material. Russia, Astrakhan’ Prov.: yellowish maculae. From a similar species 22 specimens, 7 km NNE of Dosang, 46°56´N A. piceus, it differs also in the shape of the 48°01´E, 31 Oct. 2005, coll. V. Kozlov, ZIN (11), AIC (11); 35 specimens, same locality, 1 Nov. parameres and their membranous processes 2005, coll. V. Kozlov, ZIN (18), AIC (17); 36 (Figs 8, 9), and in an almost indistinct fron- specimens, environs of Dosang, 46°54´N 47°55´E, tal tubercle (Figs 3, 4). 1 Nov. 2009, coll. A. Frolov, ZIN; 48 specimens, Comments. Aphodius guttatus has been 15 km NE of Dosang, 47°00´N 47°58´E, 31 Oct. described from Aleutian Islands and is wide- 2009, coll. A. Frolov, ZIN; 9 specimens, 8 km NE ly distributed in North America (Gordon of Dosang, 46°56´N 48°00´E, 4 Nov. 2009, coll. & Skelley, 2007). It was not recorded from A. Frolov, ZIN. Eurasia so far. We had no opportunity to ex- Diagnosis. Aphodius kizeritskyi differs amine comparative material from America, from two other species of the subgenus Aph- except for the lectotype, but the specimens odaulacus Koshantschikov, 1911 distrib- from Kamchatka agree well with the latter uted in the adjacent regions, A. turkestani- © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284 L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS 281 Figs 5–6. Aphodius, general view (male). 5, A. clathratus; 6, A. melanostictus. cus Heyden, 1881 and A. saraevi Nikolajev, ably or to confirm the synonymy. Aphodius 2004, in having pubescent sides of prono- kizeritskyi was so far known only from a few tum, and from the former, also in the slen- type specimens collected in Turkmenistan. derer and more curved apices of parameres It is possible that this species is more widely (Frolov, 2002a: Figs 1, 6). distributed in the Caspian region and most Comments. In the examined material of probably occurs in Atyrau and Mangystau provinces of Kazakhstan. Aphodius kizeritskyi from Russia, pubes- cence of the pronotum varies considerably being almost indistinct in some specimens. Aphodius (Chilothorax) clathratus Reit- It is possible that the description of A. sara- ter, 1892 (Figs 5, 7) evi is based on the specimens of A. kizeritskyi with abraded setae on the sides of prono- Material examined. Russia, Astrakhan’ Prov.: tum. Additional material from Kazakhstan 3 specimens, Dosang railway station, 46°55´N is needed to separate the two species reli- 47°55´E, 29 Oct. 2005, coll. V. Kozlov, ZIN (2), © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284 282 L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS Figs 7–10. Aphodius, distribution map (7) and aedeagus in lateral view (8–10). 7, A. clathratus; 8, A. guttatus; 9, A. piceus; 10, A. amurensis. © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284 L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS 283 AIC (1); 6 specimens, environs of Dosang, 46°55´N ratus and A. melanostictus due to its variabil- 47°55´E, fixed sands, larvae from old horse dung, ity in both species. Females of these species 9 Apr. 2008 (three larvae reared to adults in can sometimes be difficult to distinguish. laboratory), coll. A. Frolov and L. Akhmetova, Aphodius clathratus was described from ZIN; 6 specimens, 7 km NNE of Dosang, 46°56´N Ordubad (Azerbaijan). Depository of its 48°01´E, 31 Oct. 2005, coll. V. Kozlov, ZIN (3), type specimen is unknown. The species was AIC (3); 6 specimens; same locality, 1 Nov. 2005, recorded from Transcaucasia and Middle coll. V. Kozlov, ZIN (3), AIC (3). Turkey, Kars Prov.: 1 specimen, Sarikamis, 40°20´N 42°34´E, 7 Asia (Frolov, 2002b), but no reliable find- Apr. 1912, ZIN. Armenia: 4 specimens; Yerevan, ings from Russia were known. The map of 40°11´N 44°30´E, 17 March 1935, coll. M. Ter- localities for this species based mostly on Minasyan and A. Richter, ZIN; 1 specimen, same the ZIN material suggests that A. clathratus locality, 4 May 1911, ZIN; 13 specimens, same lo- is rather widely distributed but the locality cality, Nov. 1911, ZIN. Iran: 2 specimens; Kazvin, in Dosang environs is the northernmost and 36°16´N 50°00´E, 8 Jan.1943, coll. E. Pavlovskiy, far away from others (Fig. 7). The range of ZIN; 1 specimen; Khorasan, 11 Nov. 1901, coll. this species is still obscure since it is difficult N. Zarudny, ZIN. Turkmenistan: 1 specimen; western Kopet-Dagh, Aydere, 38°24´N 56°45´E, to separate it from closely-related and very 10 Apr. 1980, coll. A. Fet, ZIN; 9 specimens, similar A. melanostictus. Some published re- Murghab, 37°30´N 61°58´E, 19 Febr. 1912, ZIN; cords of A. clathratus apparently belong to 1 specimen, Iolotan´, 37°18´N 62°21´E, 10 Dec. A. melanostictus and vice versa. 1926, coll. V. Kizeritskiy, ZIN; 2 specimens, same Three adults of A. clathratus were reared locality, 19 March 1926, coll. V. Kizeritskiy, ZIN. in the laboratory from the larvae we col- Uzbekistan: 4 specimens, Samarkand, 1892, coll. lected in the vicinity of Dosang. The larvae D. Glasunov, ZIN; 1 specimen, Chupan-Ata, 39°39´N 66°57´E, 1892, coll. D. Glasunov, ZIN; are similar to those of A. melanostictus de- 1 specimen, environs of Samarkand, 39°39´N scribed by Maltsev (1966), but this descrip- 66°57´E, 6–24 Febr. 1896, coll. L. Barshchevs- tion is very short and incomplete. kiy, ZIN; 1 specimen, Golodnaya Step railway station, 40°30´ N 68°45´E, 13 Apr. 1903, coll. N. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Ivanov, ZIN; 1 specimen, same locality, 9 Apr. 1903, coll. G. Jacobson, ZIN; 1 specimen, Nurata, The authors would like to thank A.V. Ivanov 40°33´N 65°41´E, 6–15 Febr. 1987, coll. Baska- (Institute of Plant and Animal Ecology, Ural kova, ZIN; 3 specimens, Kaynar-Bulak, 39°15´N Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Eka- 66°56´E, coll. D. Glasunov, ZIN; 4 specimens; en- terinburg) and O.A. Khruleva (A.N. Severtsov virons of Navoi, 40°05´N 65°22´E, 9 Sept. 1986, Institute for Problems of Ecology and Evolution, coll. S. Kurbatov, ZIN. Tajikistan: 2 specimens; Moscow) for the material donation to the ZIN Penjakent, 39°30´N 67°36´E, 10–28 Nov. 1943, collection, A.A. Gusakov (Zoological Museum of coll. A. Kiritshenko, ZIN; 1 specimen, Karatag, Moscow University) and M.Yu. Kalashian (Insti- 38°37´N 68°20´Е, coll. E. Willberg, ZIN. tute of Zoology, National Academy of Sciences of Diagnosis. Males of A. clathratus can be Armenia, Yerevan) for the loan of the type mate- separated from the most similar species A. rial deposited in their institutions. This research melanostictus Schmidt, 1840 by having dis- was supported by the Science and Higher School tinctly and rather densely pubescent apices Committee of the Government of St. Petersburg and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Re- of elytra (Fig. 5), distinct setae on disc of search (grant number 07-04-00482-а). metathorax, narrower body, and more de- veloped dark maculae on elytra. Aphodius melanostictus has minutely to indistinctly REFERENCES pubescent apices of elytra (Fig. 6), glabrous Frolov, A.V. 2002a. New and little known spe- disc of metathorax in both sexes, wider body, cies of Aphodius subgenus Aphodaulacus and less developed dark maculae on elytra. (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) from Middle Comments. Elytral pattern is not a reli- Asia and China. Zoosystematica Rossica, able character to distinguish Aphodius clath- 11(1): 163–165. © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284 284 L.A. AKHMETOVA & A.V. FROLOV. POORLY KNOWN APHODIUS Frolov, A.V. 2002b. A review of aphodiines of Aphodiinae). Memoirs of the American Ento- the subgenus Chilothorax Motschulsky, ge- mological Institute, 79: 1–580. nus Aphodius Illiger (Coleoptera, Scarabaei- Iablokov-Khnzorian, S.M. 1972. Two new spe- dae), from Russia and neighboring countries. cies of dung beetles from the USSR. Doklady Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie, 81(1): 42–63. Akademii Nauk Armyanskoy SSR, 54: 281– (In Russian; English translation: Entomologi- 295. (In Russian). cal Review, 2002, 82: 1–18). Maltsev, I.V. 1966. Descriptions of a few un- Gordon, R. & Skelley, P. 2007. A monograph of known larvae of scarab beetles (Coleoptera, the Aphodiini inhabiting the United States Scarabaeidae) from Crimea. Entomologiches- and Canada (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: koe Obozrenie, 45(1): 144–149. (In Russian). Recieved 12 July 2009 / Accepted 20 November 2009. © 2009 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Scienсes, Zoosystematica Rossica 18(2): 278–284