ebook img

ERIC EJ1096729: Creating Synergy between Learning and Service: A University Responds to the Needs of Students and Community PDF

2005·0.06 MB·English
by  ERIC
Save to my drive
Quick download
Download
Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.

Preview ERIC EJ1096729: Creating Synergy between Learning and Service: A University Responds to the Needs of Students and Community

© Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, Volume 10, Number 3, p. 69, (2005) Creating Synergy between Learning and Service: A University Responds to the Needs of Students and Community Greg Bierly, Nancy Brattain Rogers, Kevin Snider Abstract A convergence of internal and external factors has chal- lenged the institutional identity of Indiana State University and presented an opportunity for strategic evolution toward a cam- pus better able to address student learning and serve the needs of the community and region. External drivers, such as fiscal shortfalls, declining population, and a re-envisioning of the roles of state institutions by the legislature, have compelled ISU to examine the academic and demographic composition of its enrollment base and to refocus its mission. Results from the National Survey of Student Engagement suggested that, despite long-standing perceptions of student academic prepa- ration held by faculty and administrators, and supported by entrance data, ISU undergraduates were not adequately chal- lenged within the existing system. In this article, we discuss how ISU decided to address student needs and constraints imposed by the state through a concerted program of experien- tial learning and community engagement. Background: Overview Institutions of higher education tend to follow trajectories that are determined by consensual strategic planning and allocation of resources, even while being shaped and diverted by a host of external factors. Recent discussions among intellectual leaders and policymakers in education have broadened the con- ception of the role and obligation of universities in relation to their home state and region(Votruba et al. 2002). This re-envisioning of the university’s role has occurred against the backdrop of a series of budgetary jolts to the national and state economies. Consequently, universities have been encouraged to reflect upon the educational and fiscal successes of all aspects of their operat- ing mission and function. More important, universities have been tasked with benefiting the populations and economies of the regions they serve (Reilly 2004). 70 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement Beginning in 2004 and continuing as an ongoing self-exami- nation, Indiana State University has taken a series of measures to refocus its energy on a synthesis of student-learning experiences and community engagement. Institutional planners have attempted to structure these initiatives around long-standing strengths and priorities of Indiana State University, including faculty dedication to innovative and reflective pedagogy and a strong commitment to internships and professional practice opportunities for students. In this article, we describe how traditional institutional strengths were harnessed to serve a new core of objectives attuned to our evolving student body and the needs of western Indiana. In par- ticular we discuss efforts to assess and sustain the effectiveness of the implementation of these initiatives. ISU’s Traditional Institutional Context Indiana State University was initially established in Terre Haute in 1865 as Indiana State Normal School, with the prepara- tion of teachers as its primary mission. The institution has since evolved into a residential, doctoral-degree-granting university, offering instruction at the associate’s, bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral levels. While quality teaching has remained the core value of ISU and its faculty, ISU’s classification as a Carnegie doctoral research-intensive university, alongside its proliferation of gradu- ate programs, has produced and sustained a vigorous suite of research programs and initiatives. For most of its tenure, the uni- versity has focused on providing relatively low-cost, high-quality education to a student body with special economic needs and entrance scores of reflecting a wide range of academic ability. More recently, and because of ISU’s position as a state uni- versity and the anchor of public higher education in western Indiana, faculty and administrators have come to recognize their responsibility to provide wider intellectual stewardship to the region and state. In response to changing views of the contribu- tion of higher education, as well as new relationships forged between representatives of the institution and community part- ners, ISU has grown its commitment to a curriculum that is responsive to external demand, applied research that addresses state and community needs, and a robust program of public service and experiential learning opportunities. The needs of the traditional ISU undergraduate student formed the foundation of ISU’s original mission of accessibility. These students frequently have been first-generation university Creating Synergy between Learning and Service 71 students, often hailing from the immediate geographical region. By most measures of student performance and preparation, including preliminary coursework, high school grade point average, high school class rank, and SAT scores, the average enrollee has been below state averages. ISU average SAT scores, for instance, have been below the fiftieth percentile for well over ten years. These performance factors clearly positioned freshmen in a cate- gory of students that required an effective transitional period as they entered the university system. In addition, traditional students at ISU came from households where economic considerations, including “[T]raditional insti- geographical proximity to the physi- tutional strengths cal campus, were paramount in their were harnessed to initial selection of university. At ISU, the stability of the economic status of serve a new core of the student has been shown statisti- objectives attuned to cally to be strongly related to aca- our evolving student demic success, including likelihood body and the needs of of being retained and of graduating. western Indiana.” Interestingly, given the apparent preparatory obstacles faced by incoming ISU students, surveys of student opinion reveal that students feel they are not adequately challenged by the academic pro- grams and courses in which they enroll. In particular, the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) results from 2004 indi- cate that both freshmen and seniors felt significantly less chal- lenged by examinations than did their peer respondents at other institutions. Thus despite quantitative data suggesting that our students are not as well-prepared as students at peer institutions, student perception holds that the intellectual environment at ISU could be enhanced. In concert with data on academic challenge, ISU student responses to the 2004 NSSE indicated that 80 percent of juniors and seniors intended to participate in learning experiences that placed them in the field, laboratory, and community. Such forms of pedagogy have long been lauded in the education literature as particularly effective modes of course delivery. This combined message about academic challenge and learning experiences, sent directly from students, suggested to institutional planners a qualitative and quantitative change to the stated institutional 72 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement vision and approach that would draw us more closely in line with changes occurring in the state and nation. The Challenges: State Blueprint, Terre Haute/Vigo County Needs In November 2004, the Subcommittee on Higher Education of the Indiana State Legislature submitted a report to the Indiana Government Efficiency Commission that noted “severe competi- tion by institutions pursuing the same missions and the same stu- dents” (Reilly 2004, ii). As a solution, the subcommittee proposed a new distribution of academic responsibility and resources within the state. Three tiers of higher education within the existing system were proposed. On one end of the spectrum were the research- extensive universities, whose role would remain essentially unchanged. These institutions, Indiana University and Purdue University, would hold “A form of steward- primary responsibility for educating ship of place was graduate students and conducting, implied in the pro- and procuring funding for, research posed connectedness programs. It was suggested that this between university tier of institution would now provide mission and goals only elite-level undergraduate edu- cation, and thus might experience a and regional needs.” modest decline in undergraduate population as a result. At the other end of the spectrum was the traditional undergraduate access mission, which would now become the sole province of the rapidly developing community college system, led by Ivy Tech State College. This tier would expect the largest influx of students, and a corresponding sustained growth in state budget allocation. In the middle tier, Indiana State University, alongside Ball State, was asked to fulfill a more versatile role. These research- intensive universities would sustain some graduate programs and attendant research, while strengthening the caliber of undergrad- uate education (moving away from academic access, in the case of ISU). In addition, the research conducted on these campuses was expected to be largely applied, and overwhelmingly devoted to regional concerns, particularly economic development. A form of stewardship of place was implied in the proposed connected- ness between university mission and goals and regional needs. Creating Synergy between Learning and Service 73 Although these universities could expect some gains from high- end academic enrollments (from students no longer competitive to enter IU and Purdue), they would be more than offset by losses to the growing access tier (Ivy Tech). ISU in particular has already experienced flat or declining enrollments for the past four years. The change of ISU’s mission to that of a less access-oriented campus would effectively further marginalize enrollment. For ISU, regional and community issues loom large, providing to students and faculty a host of points of entry for positive inter- vention through engagement and for purposes of teaching and research. The city of Terre Haute has experienced significant population and economic decline over the past few decades due to its shift from an agricultural and industrial to a service-based economy. In addition, the community is challenged by poverty and illiteracy rates higher than the state average. The unemploy- ment rate for Vigo County is 14 percent higher than the statewide rate of 5.1 percent. Compounding these economic factors, the county population has declined by more than 7 percent during the past two decades. Literacy is a significant concern, with one in four adults in the com- munity lacking basic literacy skills. There are also significant health and housing problems in the area, coupled to environmental con- cerns and sporadic problems with methamphetamine production and usage. It was with these elements in mind—the traditionalISU student, the proposals of the Commission for Higher Education, the many and varied needs of Terre Haute and surrounding counties, and the real need to revitalize undergraduate enrollments—that planners began to craft a new strategic vision for the university. The Initiatives: Self-Examination and Consensus Beginning in the fall semester 2002 in advance of the deci- sions of the Commission for Higher Education, and then contin- uing through winter retreat and planning sessions in 2003, 2004, and 2005, the campus community assembled to determine how to best serve our students while meeting the challenges posed by the needs of the community and declining enrollment. Representatives from all campus constituencies (students, faculty, administrators, and staff) participated in the initial phase of discussion in 2003/ 2004, in which a new campus identity was formulated by consen- sus. ISU would focus its efforts on active forms of pedagogy— experiential learning—which would be embodied and showcased most directly in courses that engaged community topics. Campus 74 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement discussants came to these foci—experiential learning and com- munity engagement—through four key realizations. First, both elements were effective means of enlivening and enhancing stu- dent learning. Second, both would strengthen university ties to the city and region. Third, data showed that ISU students actively sought these experiences (suggesting this strategy as a recruitment and retention tool). Finally, experiential learning and community engagement were currently a substantial component of existing faculty teaching and research activity, so a basis of resources and expertise already existed within the university. In addition, the foci complemented one another, as community subjects provided a natural outlet for experiential forms of pedagogy, a living labo- ratory in the immediate environment. Over the course of the next academic year, University President Lloyd Benjamin III assembled task forces to better articulate the vision behind the initiatives and to develop implemen- tation strategies and timelines. Committees met and developed recommendations for the better establishment of experiential learning and community engagement as areas in which ISU would achieve prominence regionally and nationally. In addition, measures were drafted to recognize and reward distinctive programs and scholars, units and individuals whose exceptional performance reflected an exemplary contribution and alignment to the university mission. The centerpiece and outcome of these discussions is the Alliance for Excellence through Engagement and Experience (the Alliance). This entity, a coalescence of allied centers and offices, is devoted to the promotion of the experiential learning and commu- nity engagement agenda. It is responsible for coordination of activ- ity and personnel, sharing and distribution of resources (particularly fellowship funding for faculty), and improved communication. Programs and Elements Key programs and offices, both newly developed and contin- uing, collaborate in contributing to the university’s focus on experiential learning and community engagement. A list of these entities follows, with descriptions of their roles in furthering the institution’s mission. The Alliance for Excellence through Engagement and Experience is an initiative coordinated through the Office of Academic Affairs and Center for Public Service and Community Engagement and supported by the Lilly Endowment’s Initiative Creating Synergy between Learning and Service 75 to Recruit and Retain Intellectual Capital for Indiana Higher Education Institutions. It seeks to (1) attract and retain engaged students and faculty, (2) develop high-quality experiential learning opportunities across the curriculum, (3) support the university’s efforts to work with the community on projects that will result in needed changes, and (4) build faculty excellence in the scholar- ship of teaching and engagement. The initiative builds upon exist- ing centers that are strongly concerned with experiential learning: the Center for Teaching and Learning, the Center for Public Service and Community Engagement, and Instructional Research and Technology Services. The goals of the Alliance are being met through several funded sub-programs: “Graduate funding is Students are selected for the available for students to Undergraduate Mentee Program work closely with faculty based on their record of academic excellence and community lead- on active research and ership. Mentee opportunities community engagement include working in faculty- activities through the directed research, community- Graduate Fellowship based service and outreach Program.” experiences, and other faculty- guided professional opportunities such as joint publication and paper presentations. Graduate funding is available for students to work closely with faculty on active research and community engagement activities through the Graduate Fellowship Program. Faculty are selected through application and internal review for the Faculty Fellowship Program. Fellows have demonstrated interest in problem-based learning, a plan of study focusing on a key social, economic, or cultural issue, and a plan to engage stu- dents in research and strategy implementation. Grants are shared between the faculty member and her/his home department to encourage active departmental support. The Center for Public Service and Community Engagement (CPSCE) was established in 2001 to serve as a “front door” to University resources. Under the umbrella of the Alliance, the CPSCE coordinates the university’s outreach mission and com- munity engagement activities, including service-learning and other types of community-based learning, economic development, 76 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement and community-based research. CPSCE staff work directly with external partners and ISU faculty, staff, and students to develop partnerships that advance the mission of the university and enhance the quality of life in the state and region. Four CPSCE initiatives are described in this section. Focus Indiana is a five-year project, funded through the Lilly Endowment, aimed at the creation of career opportunities for ISU graduates. The project started in January 2004. Several initiatives are funded through Focus Indiana, including the appointment of an intern coordinator to the Career Center. One primary component of the project is providing scholarships to students completing intern- ships in targeted geographic regions, including West-Central Indiana, social-entrepreneurial organizations, and entrepreneurial businesses. The Liberal Learning in Action program provides min- igrants to faculty who create community-based experiences in courses. During the 2004-2005 academic year, 70students received internship scholarships and 778 students participated in Liberal Learning in Action projects. The CPSCE is a participant in two AmeriCorps-funded proj- ects.The Midwest Campus Compact Citizen-Scholar Fellowship Program is a scholarship program that supports cohorts of pre- dominately low-income and/or first-generation college students who have demonstrated academic abilities and a passion for com- munity building through service and civic engagement. In 2005, the CPSCE received a Next Generation Planning Grant through the Indiana Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives to create an AmeriCorps program in Terre Haute. The university serves as an intermediary organization for the program. During the 2005 summer term, twelve volunteers, including students and nonstudents, were placed with four nonprofit agencies in the community. A fully operational AmeriCorps program, Sycamore Service Corps, was implemented at ISU during the fall 2005 term. This program has placed forty members in a five-county region to provide service in the areas of education, public safety, human services, and the environment. The CPSCE is also developing a Civic Leadership Certificate Program. This leadership program will be available to undergradu- atefellows and other high-achieving students through an applica- tion process. The program will focus on developing a commitment to civic leadership and public service regardless of major or career choice, and will have a strong experiential focus. Through a competitive application process, ISU juniors may be selected to participate in Real World 101, an intensive mentoring Creating Synergy between Learning and Service 77 experience with alumni during the spring break week. During spring 2005, five students participated in the Real World 101 pilot program. The students were from the Departments of Communication, Philosophy, Economics, and English and were placed with Downtown Terre Haute, Inc., United Way of the Wabash Valley, and the Family Self-Sufficiency Program of the Terre Haute Housing Authority. Participants in Real World 101 attended staff meetings, a local Rotary meeting, and a variety of other meetings with their mentors, completed a small project, and spent time in the office environment. The project will be contin- ued in 2006 as a collaborative project between the College of Arts and Sciences and Focus Indiana. Downtown Terre Haute (DTH), a local 501(c)(3) nonprofit corporation and an affiliate of Indiana Main Street, physically relocated to the CPSCE during the spring 2005 term. At that time, the first DTH director was hired. The director’s position is a full- time position, with 75 percent dedicated to DTH and 25 percent to coordinating downtown development activities of the university. During the first few months of this collaboration, the DTH director has mentored Real World 101 students, assisted with internship development, facilitated the university’s involvement in a com- munity festival, and assisted the College of Arts and Sciences in development of a community/campus symposium to discuss link- ing liberal education with civic engagement. Members of the Alliance initiative are in the process of estab- lishing the refereed Journal for Experiential Learning and Community Engagement. Currently, there are few publication outlets for scholars of student engagement, so this journal is intended to fill an important niche nationally as well as interna- tionally. The journal will require an editor, designer, and sub- scription/distribution staff. Efforts to Assess and Sustain Assessment measures for the strategic initiatives have been designed to monitor progress for purposes of administrative oversight as well as to demonstrate to the North Central Association Accrediting body that Indiana State University has achieved its goal of demonstrating excellence in community engagement and experiential learning. In addition, action steps related to the Lilly Foundation grant are assessed periodically throughout the year to enhance efforts to fulfill expectations stated in the grant. 78 Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement In all, over seventy outcomes have been identified as stem- ming from successful achievement of the strategic initiatives. The process of setting the goals originated in the Strategic Planning Office with opportunity for feedback given to the Planning Committee. Final measures were decided by the president and the provost. Measures include increasing student academic credentials such as GPA, SAT, and Core 40 completion. Faculty reporting was used to assess number of experiential learning experiences, student involvement in external grants activity, and scholarship. Finally, university statistics were used to assess graduation and retention rates. The NSSE will be continu- ally monitored to assess student involvement in internships, “The key now is to experiential learning and com- ensure sustainability . . .” munity engagement experiences, overall university experience, perception of academic chal- lenge, and so on. Initial results from the NSSE, which reflect the nascent development of the strategic initiatives, reveal limited progress. When considering the two-year change between 2003 and 2005 cohorts, NSSE scores for ISU first-year students indicate a 4 percent increase in the number of students who described themselves as able to “learn effectively on their own,” alongside a 3 percent increase in those reporting the ability to solve “complex, real-world prob- lems” (based on students who responded “very much” or “quite a bit”). In addition, the number of students in the 2005 cohort indicating that they were contributing to the welfare of their com- munity was 12 percent higher than in 2003. Scores from ISU sen- iors reflected a similar shift, with increases of 3 percent, 1 percent, and 3 percent respectively in the above categories. These changes, particularly the marked increase in contribution to community welfare noted by first-year students, are quite likely related to implementation of strategies by the Alliance. Not all NSSE results were so clear (or positive) during this early stage of the implementation. While comparison of the 2003 and 2005 first-year student cohorts reveals a 6 percent increase in students attesting that they “worked harder than they thought they could” and a modest increase in the degree to which cohorts indicated that class work “challenged them,” the 2005 cohort also reported a 6 percent reduction in the amount of critical thinking

See more

The list of books you might like

Most books are stored in the elastic cloud where traffic is expensive. For this reason, we have a limit on daily download.