DOCUMENT RESUME FL 025 000 ED 415 692 AUTHOR Nunan, David TITLE Language Teaching and Research. 1997-00-00 PUB DATE 10p.; In: Classroom Teachers and Classroom Research; see FL NOTE 024 999. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Classroom Research; Classroom Techniques; Educational Trends; *Instructional Improvement; *Research Methodology; Second Language Instruction; Second Languages; Trend Analysis ABSTRACT A discussion of the relationship between language teaching and research begins by defining research as a systematic process of inquiry in which the researcher poses a question or questions, collects relevant data, analyzes and interprets it, and makes the results accessible to others. It looks at the simplistic but persistent distinction between qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Some basic principles teachers can derive from research are summarized: (1) make instructional goals explicit to learners; (2) give learners opportunities to make their own contributions to the (3) encourage active communication through sequenced, learning process; achievable tasks; (4) provide opportunities for learners to apply their skills beyond the classroom; (5) teach learning strategies as well as (6) teach grammar in ways that show the essential harmony between content; (7) go beyond declarative knowledge to procedural skills form and function; (8) give learners an opportunity to work with authentic data; development; (9) maximize opportunities for learners to work cooperatively; and (10) provide learners with opportunities to self-monitor. Classroom research is encouraged to be made more contextualized and classroom-oriented, for closer links between teaching and research, for collaborative research, and for development of an extended vision of the nature of research. Contains 35 references. (MSE) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research PERMISSION TO and Improvement REPRODUCE AND RESOURCES INFORMATION DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL CENTER (ERIC) 1PIUCATIONAL This document has been HAS BEEN GRANTED reproduced as BY received from the person or organization --\e_rv2 originating it. QA-1, Minor changes have Chapter 1 been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not TO THE EDUCATIONAL necessarily represent RESOURCES official OERI position or policy. INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Language Teaching and Research David Nunan University of Hong Kong In this introductory paper, I should like to do three things. In the first place, I should like to articulate a vision of research which is in harmony with second and foreign language education. Secondly, I should like to summarize what I see as some of the things we have learned from research that can help us as we struggle to improve what we do in the classroom. The final thing I should like to do is to set out what I see as some important future trends for applied research in language education. Approaches to Research It is something of a curiosity to me that few of the recent spate of books on research in language education attempt to offer a definition of the term itself. So, years ago I asked a group of my graduate students, all language teachers who were embarking on an M.A. in Applied Linguistics, what the term meant for them. Some of their responses are set out below. Enquiry has two components: process and product. The process is about an area of enquiry and the process used to pursue that. The product is the knowl- edge generated from the process as well as the initial area to be presented. A process which involves (a) defining a problem, (b) stating an objective, and (c) formulating an hypothesis. It involves gathering information, classi- fication, analysis, and interpretation to see to what extent the initial objec- tive has been achieved. 0 BEST COPY AVAILABLE David Nunan 14 Undertaking structured investigation which hopefully results in greater un- derstanding of the chosen interest area. Ultimately, this investigation be- comes accessible to the public. An activity which analyses and critically evaluates some problem. To collect and analyse the data in a specific field with the purpose of prov- ing your theory. Evaluation, asking questions, investigations, analysis, confirming hypotheses, overview, gathering and analysing data in a specific field according to cer- tain predetermined methods. researcher For me, research is a systematic process of inquiry in which the data on the question(s), analy- poses a question or questions, collects relevant results of the inquiry publicly ses and interprets the questions, and makes the accessible in some way. Donald Freeman, who has written extensively on research in TESOL is one research suggesting that it is "a person who has offered a characterization of basic process of developing and rendering viable interpretations for things in of the world" (Freeman, 1996, p. 102). While this is a normal and natural part everyday life, research differs from normal human curiosity through its systematicity and accessibility to scrutiny. In practical terms, research is a pro- relating to practice, col- cess of formulating questions or articulating "puzzles" lecting relevant data that might have a bearing on such questions or puzzles, interpreting and explaining the data, and making the results of the inquiry publicly accessible in some way (Nunan, 1992a). As Freeman pointed out, to give this process the label "research" is important because it gives the activity value. "When Ethel questioning of practice takes place within a framework la- beled 'research,' understanding the complexity of teaching can become a public and legitimate part of being a teacher" (Freeman, 1996, p. 103). Many commentators argue that there are two competing traditions in re- search. The first of these, the quantitative tradition, is obtrusive and controlled and is concerned with established generalizable relationships between vari- ables. The other, the qualitative tradition, is concerned with generating insight and understanding rather than establishing "truths." More recently, it has been argued that this distinction is simplistic and naive. Elsewhere, I have suggested that while the distinction was simplistic it is also persistent: One reason for the persistence of the distinction between quantitative and qualita- tive research, is that the two approaches represent different ways of thinking about and understanding the world around us. Underlying the development of different research traditions and methods is a debate on the nature of knowledge, and the status of assertions about the world, and the debate itself is ultimately a philo- sophical one. It is commonly assumed that the function of research is to add to our knowledge of the world and to demonstrate the 'truth' of the commonsense no- In developing one's own philosophy on tions we have about the world. . . . 3 Language Teaching and Research 15 research, it is important for us to determine where we stand on the notion of 'truth' in relation to research. What is truth? (Even more basically, do we accept that there is such a thing as 'truth'?) What is evidence? Can we ever 'prove' anything? What evidence would compel us to accept the truth of an assertion or proposition? These are questions which need to be borne constantly in mind as one reads and evaluates research. (Nunan, 1992a, p. 10) What Have We Learned From Research? In conducting teacher education seminars on research methods, I am sometimes confronted with the view that research is an esoteric activity that has little to do with the real world, and little to say to the classroom practitioner. I beg to differ. While honest research is messy, the results often inconsistent if not contradictory, and the outcomes uncertain, research has helped to advance our understanding of the processes underlying language acquisition. I also believe that research can offer us an empirical basis for practice. At a recent conference in Brazil (Nunan, 1996b), I was asked to address the relationship of research to practice, and to spell out the practical implications of research for language pedagogy. I gave my own idiosyncratic list of principles that guide my teaching and materials writing that are derived from my own research and that of others. These I have reproduced below, along with the research from which they are derived. 1. Make instructional goals explicit to learners in ways they can understand. Goal setting can have exceptional importance in stimulating L2 learning and enhancing motivation (Oxford & Shearin, 1993). Motivation is enhanced when learning goals are made clear (Reilly, 1994). Learning was enhanced in classes where teachers made goals explicit. Ex- plicit goal setting was relatively rare in classrooms observed (Nunan, 1996a). 2. Give learners opportunities to make their own contributions to the learning process. Learners have definite views on what they want to learn and how they want to learn. These are often at variance with the views of the teacher. Learning is enhanced when learners are involved in making choices (Nunan, 1987). Young learners are able to take responsibility for planning, organising, man- aging and evaluating their own learning (Dam & Gabrielsen, 1988). Students want to be involved in the selection of language content and the learning process. There are major mismatches between the desires of the students and the mandated curriculum (Widdows & Vol ler, 1991). Classroom topics nominated by learners were much more likely to be learned than topics determined by the teacher (Slimani, 1992). Learning is enhanced when students are actively involved in selecting con- tent, learning tasks, and evaluation (Heath, 1992). 4 David Nunan 16 3. Encourage active communication through sequenced, achievable tasks. Spoken output in groupwork is a significant factor to the acquisition of vocabulary (Hall, 1991). Learner participation in class relates significantly to improvements in lan- guage proficiency (Lim, 1992). Motivation is enhanced when tasks are sequenced and linked in ways that make sense to the learner (Reilly, 1994). Active use of target language with strong emphasis on practice in naturalis- tic situations is notable in helping students attain higher proficiency (Green & Oxford, 1995). 4. Provide opportunities for learners to apply their skills beyond the classroom. Supplementing classroom instruction with out-of-class tasks results in sig- nificantly increased language gains (Montgomery & Eisenstein, 1985). Instruction and opportunities to communicate out of class are both neces- sary. Improvement occurred when subject consciously "noticed the gap" (Schmidt & Frota, 1986). The "good" foreign language learner finds ways of activating his or her language out of class (Nunan, 1991). 5. Teach learning strategies as well as language content. The ability to infer or induct rules is an important aspect of language apti- tude (Carroll, 1981). Strategy training had a significant effect on speaking development (O'Malley, Chamot, Stewner-Manzanares, Russo, & Kupper, 1985). Effective learners are aware of the processes underlying their own learning and seek to use appropriate learning strategies to control their own learn- ing (Jones, Palincsar, Ogle, & Carr, 1987). More effective learners use strategies more frequently, and use a greater variety of strategies than students designated as less effective learners (O'Malley & Chamot, 1990). Good learners are aware of strategies that worked for them, and can articu- late these (Nunan, 1991). There is a significant relationship between strategy use and success in lan- guage learning (Green & Oxford, 1995). 6. Teach grammar in ways that show the essential harmony between form and function. Grammar exists in order to enable learners to communicate in increasingly sophisticated ways (Nunan, 1993). Grammar and vocabulary are best acquired through learner involvement in the processing and production of discourse (McCarthy & Carter, 1994). Language Teaching and Research 17 7. Go beyond declarative knowledge to procedural skills development. "Communicative" classrooms with instruction plus opportunities for inter- action are superior to "traditional" instruction and also to immersion pro- grams (Spada, 1990). Formal instruction resulted in acquisition of some structures (passives) but not others (tense and aspect). Explicit (declarative) knowledge can be con- verted to implicit (procedural) knowledge through practice (Zhou, 1991). Declarative knowledge (ability to identify errors and state rule violation) does not lead to procedural knowledge (ability to put known forms to com- municative effect) without opportunities to activate knowledge through out- put activities (Wuclong, 1994). 8. Give learners an opportunity to work with authentic data. Non-authentic data misrepresents the nature of genuine communication (Nunan, 1991). Authenticity significantly enhances motivation in foreign language classes (Ho, 1995). 9. Maximize opportunities for learners to work cooperatively. Small group tasks prompt students to use a greater range of language func- tions than teacher fronted tasks (Long, Adams, & Castanos, 1976). Cooperative learning leads to positive interdependence but also individual accountability, extensive face-to-face interaction, and the development of social skills (Kohonen, 1992). 10. Provide learners with opportunities to self-monitor and self-check. Opportunities for learners to self-monitor and self-check lead to greater sen- sitivity to the learning process. Learners develop skills in articulating what they want to learn and how they want to learn (Nunan, 1995). Future Trends And so to the future. What direction would I like to see research in language education taking? I believe that a future research agenda should be contextualised and classroom oriented. It should forge closer links between teaching and research of the type indicated in the body of this paper. It should encourage collaboration between researchers, teachers and students. And, finally, it should seek to extend our vision of research. Each of these points is commented on below. 1. Contextualized and classroom-oriented. The need for research to be contextualized is slowly being recognised. Even university-based researchers with little direct contact to classroom realities are beginning to recognise the limited applicability of research outcomes which BEST COPY AVAILABLE 6 David Nunan 18 have been derived from contexts other than those in which teaching and learn- ing typically occur. To acknowledge that context affects behavior is to acknowl- edge that conclusions reached in one context can be taken as nothing more than working hypotheses in other contexts. 2. Closer links between teaching and research. Related to the first point is an appreciation of the need for developing closer links between teaching and research. Allwright and Bailey (1991) coined the phrase "exploratory teaching" to capture this alternative vision in which it is unnecessary to decide whether one is engaged in teaching or research; rather one is engaged in both. In other words, exploratory teaching describes a philo- sophical stance or attitude of mind towards one's classroom practice. It is an ongoing process of working constantly for deeper understanding and increas- ing effectiveness in the classroom. Underlying their approach to reflective teaching are the assumptions that (a) autonomous teachers are the key link between teaching, learning, and research, and (b) becoming more effective as a teacher is a life-long, spiraling process. The teacher is the researcher's link with learners, and also the learners' link with research. The teacher is contracted to help learners learn, but can do so better by knowing about previous research and by using the procedures of classroom re- search to understand better what is happening in his or her own classroom. In this way the exploratory teacher will not only improve achievement but will also con- tribute to our general research knowledge about how language classrooms work. This is what we mean by 'exploratory teaching'teaching that not only tries out new ideas, but that also tries to learn as much as possible from doing so. . . Any . good experienced teacher will no doubt spend a lot of class time on ideas that are tried and trusted. Turning that 'good' teaching into 'exploratory' teaching is a mat- ter of trying to find out what makes the tried and trusted ideas successful. (Allwright & Bailey, 1991, p. 197) 3. Collaborative research. Collaborative research is research in which all those involved in the research process, teacher-researchers, administrators, and informants have an active role and a voice within the process itself. The term also refers to inquiry carried out by multiple participants across a number of teaching sites. The value of col- laboration is slowly being recognised, and is something which the field should seek to encourage. Such collaboration can be facilitated by the networks and systems (electronic and otherwise), which can help to link together individuals who might be working in different contexts (and even different countries). Teacher-researchers who collaborate can generate more powerful ideas, ini- tiate more interesting research, and achieve more useful outcomes, than those working in isolation. A useful question for consideration is: "What are the Language Teaching and Research 19 central characteristics of a collaborative approach to classroom research, and in what ways do the different contributions of teachers, learners and research- ers provide us with insights which would be difficult to obtain in any other way?" (Nunan, 1992b, p. 8). 4. An extended vision of the nature of research. There is growing acceptance within the social sciences generally that research- ers need to develop a greater range of models, tools, and analytical techniques. Teacher-researchers working in language education should develop an extended vision of the nature of research. They should extend the theoretical bases of the research as well as the range of research tools, techniques, and methods. While conventional research methodsexperiments, ethnographies, case studies and the likehave their place within a practitioner-oriented research agenda, there is a need to go beyond these. Ways of extending the agenda exist in the litera- ture. These include focused teaching (Allwright & Bailey, 1991), action research (Nunan, 1989), narrative accounts (Freeman, 1994). The four key principles set out in this section underlie my vision of the kind of research agenda I would like to develop and promote. Such an agenda, while not rejecting quantitative research, seeks to enhance the status of constructivist, humanistic research paradigms which are focused on understanding and explaining the contexts in which language education is conducted around the world. Insight and understanding, rather than causality and proof capture the essence of the perspective I am trying to promote. References Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press. Carroll, J. B. (1981). Twenty-five years of research on foreign language aptitude. In K. C. Diller (Ed.), hidividual differences and universals in language learning aptitude (pp. 83-118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G. (1988). Developing learner autonomy in a school context: A six-year experiment beginning in the learners' first year of English. In H. Holec (Ed.), iomy arid self directed learning: Present fields of application. Strasbourg: Council A of Europe. Freeman. D. (1994, October). The storyteller, the anthropologist, the theoretician, and the social activist: Charting the dimensions of teacher-research. Plenary presentation at TESOL, France. Freeman, D. (1996). Redefining the relationship between research and what teachers know. In K. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261 -297. Hall. S. (1991). The effect of split information tasks on the acquisition of mathematical BEST COPY AVAILABLE 8 David Nunan 20 vocabulary. Unpublished masters dissertation, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Heath, S. B. (1992). Literacy skills or literate skills? Considerations for ESL/EFL learners. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 40-55). Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press. Ho, A. (1995). Task motivation in language learning. Unpublished master's thesis, Chi- nese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Jones, B., Palinscar, A., Ogle, D., & Carr, E. (1987). Strategic teaching and learning: Cognitive instruction in the content areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Kohonen, V. (1992). Experiential language learning: Second language learning as coop- erative learner education. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 14-39). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lim, S. (1992). Investigating learner participation in teacher-led classroom discussions in junior colleges in Singapore from a second language acquisition perspective. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Long, M. H., Adams, L., & Castanos, F. (1976). Doing things with words: Verbal interac- tion in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In R. Crymes, & J. Fanselow (Eds.), On TESOL '76. Washington, DC: TESOL. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994, March). The grammar of spoken discourse. Paper pre- sented at the Annual TESOL Convention, Baltimore. Montgomery, C., & Eisenstein, M. (1985). Real reality revisited: An experimental commu- nicative course in ESL. TESOL Quarterly, 19 (2), 317-335. Nunan, D. (1987, April). Hidden agendas in the language classroom. Paper presented at the RELC Regional Seminar, Singapore. Nunan, D. (1989). Understanding language classrooms. London: Prentice-Hall. Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. London: Prentice-Hall. Nunan, D. (1992a). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (Ed.) (1992b). Collaborative language learning and teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin. Nunan, D. (1995a) ATLAS: Learning-centered communication. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Nunan, D. (19951)). Self-assessment as a tool for learning. In D. Nunan, R. Berry, & V. Berry (Eds.), Bringing about change in language education (pp. 41-44). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong. Nunan, D. (1996a). Hidden voices: Insiders' perspectives on classroom interaction. In K. Bailey, & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education (pp. 41-56). New York: Cambridge University Press. Nunan, D. (1996b, July). Ten ideas that changed the way I teach. Plenary presentation, BrazTESOL Convention, Goiania, Brazil. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Russo, G., & Kupper, L. (1985). Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2) 285-286. O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisi- tion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 9 Language Teaching and Research 21 Oxford, R., & Shea fin, J. (1993). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language journal, 78, 12-28. Reilly, P. (1994). The effect of teacher strategies on students' motivation levels in English language classes. Unpublished master's thesis, University of the Americas, Mexico City, Mexico. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: C'ont:ersation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House. Slimani, A. (1992). Evaluation of classroom interaction. In J. C. Alderson, & A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education (pp. 197-211). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Spada, N. (1990). Observing classroom behaviors and learning outcomes in different second language programs. In J. C. Richards, & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teaching education (pp. 293-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Widclows, S., & \Toiler, P. (1991). PANSI: A survey of ELT needs of Japanese university students. Cross Currents XVIII, 2. Wudong, W. (1994). English language development in China. Unpublished doctoral dis- sertation, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. Zhou, Y. P. (1991). The effect of explicit instruction on the acquisition of English gram- matical structures by Chinese learners. In C. James, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Language awareness in the classroom (pp. 254-277). London: Longman. 10