DOCUMENT RESUME ED 398 867 IR 018 046 AUTHOR Jackman, Diane H.; Swan, Michael K. TITLE Instructional Models Effective in Distance Education. PUB DATE 96 NOTE 16p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (New York, NY, April 8-12, 1996). PUB TYPE Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MFO1 /PCO1 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College Programs; *Distance Education; Graduate Students; Higher Education; Inquiry; *Instructional Effectiveness; Memorization; Role Playing; Simulation; *Student Attitudes; Student Surveys; *Teaching Methods IDENTIFIERS *Instructional Models; *North Dakota State University; Ranking ABSTRACT The purpose of this study was to identify which instructional models based on the framework of Joyce, Weil, and Showers, could be used effectively in distance education over the Interactive Video Network (IVN) system in North Dakota. Instructional models have been organized into families such as Information Processing, Social, Personal, and Behavioral systems. Each family contains several different instructional models with similar assumptions leading to similar outcomes. Models may involve techniques like advance organizers, analogies, memorization, simulation, and role playing. Subjects were 126 students enrolled in selected IVN distance education courses at North Dakota State University during 1993-1994 and 1994-1995 academic years and the summer 1995 session. These included students enrolled in graduate courses offered by the School of Education, and one undergraduate/graduate course offered by the College of Business. A survey was administered to students at both on-campus and off-campus sites to measure the most effective and preferred of the instructional models. Results indicated that the six highest ranking instructional models (representing three of the families of instructional models) most effectively utilized over a distance delivery system are: role playing; simulation; jurisprudential; memorization; synectics; and inquiry. Students perceived direct instruction to be the least effective instructional model. They preferred models that actively engage them as learners both physically and mentally. Recommendations for future research include: examine the relationship between the discipline and the instructional models favored; evaluate and revise the distance education handbook to include specific ideas from IVN instructors; and evaluate the instructional models currently being used. A table provides a rank order to effective instructional models using IVN distance education. (Contains 11 references.) (AEF) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION . CENTER (ERIC) This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. Instructional Models Effective in Distance Education by Dr. Diane H. Jackman Family & Consumer Sciences and Teacher Education 155 E. Morrow Lebedeff Hall North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105 (701) 231-7102 [email protected] Dr. Michael K. Swan Agricultural & Extension Education 155 E. Morrow Lebedeff Hall North Dakota State University Fargo, ND 58105 (701) 231-7439 [email protected] "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS BEST COPY AVABLABLE MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY Diane H. Jackman 2 TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." Abstract Learning is a complex process in traditional classrooms but in a This study distance education classroom it becomes even more complicated. examines the instructional models that can be used effectively over one type Results indicate that both undergraduate and of a distance education system. graduate students prefer models that actively engage them as learners both physically and mentally. Recommendations for future research are proposed. 3 Instructional Models Effective in Distance Education Learning is a complex process involving interactions among instructor, In a student, content, and the instructional environment (Keefe, 1987). traditional classroom setting, instructors accommodate and adapt to student needs, content needs, and environmental needs using a variety of instructional Distance educators have become increasingly familiar with the models. As technology available to design and create effective learning environments. technology becomes a major player in instructional design, it is imperative that instructional models providing effective instruction be identified. Instructional models have been organized into families: social, information processing, personal, and behavioral systems (Joyce, Weil, and Each family contains several different instructional models Showers (1992). A brief description of with similar assumptions leading to similar outcomes. each family and its' instructional models follows. The Information Processing Family instructional models refer to the way students organize and acquire data, sense problems, generate concepts and solutions, employ verbal and non-verbal skills, and develop concepts. The models emphasize creative thinking, concept formation, and hypothesis testing. Instructional models included in this family are: concept attainment, advance organizer, memorization, inquiry, synectics, and the inductive approach (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). In the advance organizer model, a teacher presents material in a clear precise order, with numerous examples related to students' prior knowledge. At the end of the lesson, students summarize the lesson and/or provide new examples or relationships (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Kauchak and Eggen, 1993; Eby and Kujawa, 1994; Orlich et al., 1994). 4 In concept attainment, instructors provide students with examples and non-examples of a concept. Additional examples and non-examples of the concept are given and the student is asked to identify common characteristics. Additional examples are provided and students are asked to hypothesize about Once students identify the concept, additional examples and non- the concept. examples of the concept are developed (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Kauchak and Eggen, 1993; Orlich et al., 1994). Students attempt to solve puzzling problems in an inquiry model. The students collect and verify data, develop concepts/hypotheses, test concepts or hypotheses, and draw conclusions under the supervision of a teacher. Students are challenged to think about what is happening at all times, by each other and the instructor (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Orlich et al., 1994). The synectics model is used to enhance the students' creative thinking processes by using analogies to make the unfamiliar familiar. The teacher guides students through this model by asking a series of questions. The interactions between teacher and student throughout this model allow for discussions of similarities and differences between the original idea and the analogy. A better understanding of the original concept results along with an expansion of the creative thinking process (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). Memorization techniques assist students in remembering facts, data, and/or information. Many different techniques, including key-word, substitute-word, link-work, ridiculous association and exaggeration are all effective in enabling student learning. Mnemonic devices students develop themselves, have been found to be the most effective in retention of knowledge (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Kauchak and Eggen, 1993). Teachers using an inductive model present students with a general idea to investigate and are allowed to structure a problem they would like to Students identify critical data to pursue within some basic parameters. gather, interpret data, identify relationships and/or apply principles to During the model, the instructor uses a variety of explain new phenomena. questions to assist students (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Kauchak and Eggen, 1993; Orlich et al., 1994). The Behavioral Family instructional models emphasize changing the visible behavior of the learner rather than a learner's psychological A basic assumption of all behavioral structure or unobservable behavior. family models is that human beings are self correcting communication systems and will modify behavior in response to previous behavior. Some of the instructional models in this family are mastery learning, direct instruction, and simulations (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). The simulation model is a duplication of actual problems, events, or situations where the risk of injury to students is eliminated. The simulation is designed to mirror an actual event as closely as possible and involve students actively. Simulations can involve both physical skill and social interaction simulations (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Orlich et al., 1994). In direct instruction, material is presented in small, sequenced Connections are explicitly made for students and time is allocated segments. for practice and feedback from the instructor. Constant review of previous learning is a part of this model as well as feedback and practice (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Eby and Kujawa, 1994; Orlich et al., 1994). The Social Family instructional models emphasize the relationships of individuals to society and to other people. The instructional models in this family are designed to take advantage of the collective energy that occurs 6 when learning communities are built within a classroom. Some of the cooperative learning groups, role instructional models in this family are: playing, jurisprudential, and conceptual systems (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992) . The role playing model is used when an instructor wants to immerse students in an active learning situation. A problem or event to which students can easily relate is identified, roles are assigned to selected students, and the remaining class members are active observers of the role play event and given instructions on who and what to observe. Role playing is most effective when a structured discussion follows the role playing event. The discussion many times results in further re-enactments of the situation and continued discussions about the event (Shaftel and Shaftel, 1982; Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Eby and Kujawa, 1994; Orlich et al., 1994). Cooperative learning provides an opportunity for students to structure their own learning within a team setting. Groups can contain as few as two people or as many as four to six people. Each group member is responsible for ensuring that all group members understand and learn the material. This responsibility is something that teachers must spend some time explaining to students when this instructional model is first introduced to students. Within this model are numerous techniques an instructor can select to use in a classroom. The technique selected is based on content and intended student outcomes (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992; Kauchak and Eggen, 1993; Eby and Kujawa, 1994; Johnson and Johnson, 1994; Orlich et al., 1994). The jurisprudential model involves the instructor and students in Socratic dialogue. The instructor presents material which students use to form public policy issues. The students take a position on the policy issue During this process, the and gather evidence to support their point of view. BEST COPY AVAILABLE 7 instructor questions students to enhance their critical thinking skills and must be skilled in questioning techniques (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). Conceptual systems is a framework for thinking about how individual students learn. The theory describes human development in terms of increasingly complex systems for processing information about people, things, and events and was developed by David Hunt and associates. In order for the information processing systems to be effective, appropriately complex learning environments must be designed. It is not a specific instructional model but rather a way to structure information for student comprehension (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). The Personal Family instructional models focus on an orientation to self and self development. The main goal of these instructional models is to help students develop productive relationships with their environments and view themselves as capable persons. Concepts of self and nondirective teaching are two of the instructional models in this family. Both of these models rely heavily on one-to-one interaction and are based on counseling models (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). All of these instructional models have been found to be effective in traditional classroom. Teachers are encouraged to implement a variety of these instructional models to better address all student learning styles (Joyce, Weil, and Showers, 1992). Distance education via the Interactive Video Network (IVN), simultaneous two-way audio visual interaction, brings an additional set of issues to be considered by the instructor and effective models for this delivery system need to be identified. The distance education system being used in North Dakota at this time is a two-way interactive telecommunications system located at many sites throughout the state. Any combination of two to fourteen sites S may be connected together for a single event and several events may occur at IVN students can hear all sites at all times but can only see the same time. up to four other sites at one time. The network automatically switches the For the automatic switching to video to the site that is currently speaking. occur, a sound must last about two seconds. IVN uses a compressed digital video format. The picture is very high quality but is not quite as well defined as network television. Instructors are given some training prior to their first teaching opportunity on the system but the training is limited to information that is specific to the system, not the variety of instructional models available for use on the system. Rather, information regarding a The focus of the training traditional format - i.e. lecture is presented. is on learning the operation of the equipment and system (Teacher Training Workshop Manual 1993; 1994; 1995). Active learning models were found to be effective in distance education with adult students (Jackman & Swan, 1995). Graduate students indicated a preference for the role playing, simulation, jurisprudential, and memorization models. All four of these models represent strategies that allow students to be active both physically and mentally in the learning process. In order for these models to be used in distance education, minor modifications were made to each instructional model. Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify the instructional models, based on the framework of Joyce, Weil, & Showers (1992), that can be used effectively in distance education over the IVN system in North Dakota. The objectives of this study were reflected in the following research questions: What instructional models are preferred by students both on- 1. campus and off-campus? What instructional models are effective when used in distance 2. education? Methodology Students enrolled in selected IVN courses at North Dakota State University during the 1993-1994 and 1994-1995 academic years and the summer of 1995 served as the sample for this study. This included students enrolled in graduate courses offered by the School of Education and one undergraduate/graduate course offered by the College of Business. The effectiveness of the instructional models proposed by Joyce, Weil and Showers (1992), for use in the IVN system in North Dakota, was determined using a survey instrument developed by the researchers. This survey instrument was designed using a 5 point Likert scale and pilot tested with IVN instructors and students at North Dakota State University during the Summer of 1993. Minor modifications were made to the survey instrument following the pilot test. The Cronbach Coefficient Alpha test was used to determine reliability of the appropriate sections of the instrument r=.84. The alpha level for all statistical testing in this study was set at the .05 level. The items in the survey instrument were related to instructional models, the IVN system in general, and demographics. After securing permission from the instructor responsible for the class, the survey instrument was administered to students at both on-campus and off- campus sites. Data were analyzed using appropriate statistical analysis. Statistical analysis programs designed for the microcomputer were utilized. 10