DISCLAIMER NOTICE  The contents in this document are the views of their authors.  The District of Summerland  makes no representations or warranties as to the accuracy of the information.  Any reliance  you place on such information is at your own risk.   Links to other websites contained in this document are not under the control of the District  of Summerland and do not imply a recommendation or endorsement of the views expressed  within them.  Please visit http://www.summerland.ca/planning‐building/banks‐crescent to view District of  Summerland  Reports,  Legislation,  Policy,  Assessments,  Studies,  and  Drawings  on  the  proposed development.    Jeremy Denegar  Corporate Officer Karen Jones Action From: M~r ~ Sent: June 6, 2016 7;)8 AM Ackn0-"'1-ed_g_ed"7'": ____ To: Kai en Jorie~ Copy to· Subject: Fw: QUESTION ' Attachments: Valley ot Heaven_2 __ ower Town_July20_201S_bJpg; 21-Sumn'I. Surroundings.jpg - CAO - councn CorresPOndence A Importance: Hiqh \t»'~;~... Reading Fiie: _Agenda Item: ___ Referred to J H -·afCi {ql'fcrw-1 (r~ ~ (}, ,f- -- t?f Comp!eted ~ .~ Sent from Windows Mail From; Aart Dronkers Sent: Sunday, June 05, 20_16 4:29 PM To: Mayor, Erin Trainer, Janet Peake, Richard Barkwill, Toni Boot, Erin Carlson, Doug Holmes Cc: Arirt and Jos Dronker.s ·\, Dea;Mayor. . Wa..t..e.. ,r.m. an,. .D.. .e ar. .C.o..u.n.c.i.l M. .e.mbers1- Please see the attached, we came across these photos on our computer this morning. Assum Ing that you know about the project that is being proposed, our question for you is as follows: Would you want to attach your name to a project that destructs this pristine valley rather than preserve it? It is very hard to believe that this beautiful valley, actively used for agricultural purposes, would have any less value than the ALR land you preserved as the leadership team of Summerland. This very issue, as you well know, was a much debated agenda item during the election campaign. Even if the only option would be to develop something in this valley, we kindly ask you to build low profile rather than a 4·6 story monster, and preserve as much as possible of its present status. Sincerely, Aart & Josefa Dronkers 1 Karen Jones From: A&H SIELMANN Sent: November 10, 2016 3:22 PM To: Mayor and Council Subject: Bristow Valley Importance: High Greetings Council Members! I have recently received an email indicating a proposed development in an area known as "Bristow Valley" between Solly Road and Faircrest Street. I checked the rocation on Google Maps and it truly is a beautiful spot currently used as a vineyard. Although I am not oDoos~d to development in some areas, I am concerned that a 640 senior complex in that location is not only inappropriate but virtually inaccessible and complicated for seniors to travel to town and be part of our Community. Are there not other areas in town that would be more suitable and convenient for that type of construction? I remember the controversy surrounding the ALR land when our Council took office. Many of you agreed with keeping the ALR landscape and indeed made changes to that effect. I hope you still have the same mindset. A complex of that size (640 seniors) may be better placed in an area where services, residents and transit have an easier time accessing the property. Thanks! Best regards, Action Angela 8r Henry Sielmann File: ____ ~~- Acknowfedged: I 1k t . Copy to: _Mayor _Council _CAO / Council Correspondence _ Readiig File: _Agenda Item: _ _ _ Referred to ~dby:_..,.f-- Action Fie: (o'{\ . ~ · <:) • "1:Mowledgea: - \5): QJpy lo: --rt--- To: Mayor Peter Waterman _ Mayor _Council Summerland Council Memhers _CAO Council Correspondence Re: Destruction of a Pristine Valley -:T ::L Reooing File: , _Agenda Item: Date: July 27, 2016 Refened to l (1\ --/*)" ,1~_-,. :(£tl\J- ~by: \'.., r) = ~ Dear Mayor, Dear Council Members, We, the undersigned. would appreciate if you would give serious consideration to the following: We just learned from a friend who spoke lo our Mayor, Claat the Bristow VaUc:y Project is a "done deal". That is shocking. to say the least, and disappointing~ particularly because there has not been any fonn of publi' hearing/discussion regarding a major change to our fragile environment. Allow us to quote Doug Holmes in regard to the mature tree discussion in Trout Creek, which we feel is quite clearly a dror on a hot plate in comparison to the Bristow Valley Prqject: QUOTE "ft boggles my mind that in 2016 someone can have such a disregard for the trees and the environment" UNQCOTE. We agree with Doug und hence feel that his statement strongly applies to the Bristow VaJl~y project. We hop~ however that it does not apply to our City CounciL Following are excerpt from an email we sent to Doug Holmes, Toni Boot and Janet Peake a while ago after a presenta1ion by the developers from Surrey Vancouver. The developers gave out a brochure that looked, as it turned out, deceivingly romantic, wjthout any details ahout the very large structures they are proposing to build. It is now time, hopefully not too late, to distribute our considerations tu tht: wid.t.'T Council audience and the public if needed. DEVELOPERS PRFSENTATIO~: There was a heated debate and questioning. The reception of this proposal Vias not a happy one. In addition, several had heard about this meeting second hand, others had received a brochure in the: mail box. EN Vl llONMENT: This valley is one of the last pristine natural beauty areas left in Lower Town. It offers stunning views from all sides. The views are part of the Summerland signature Centennial Trail. used by locals and tourists alike. The developers proposal is to build three 4-6 story buildings there for senior living. The valley is used for agricultural purposes (there are actively worked vineyards there). The plan would call for rezoning an agricultural area into a residential one. We just went through a near civil war over the ALR swap plan and principally this is a similar problem. With due respect, in our opinion the ALR area pales in comparison with the Bristow Valley in terms of use and beauty. Our mayor and council were elected for their strive to protect our environment and revitalize the Summerland core. To our knowledge, a 4-6 story complex will be the highest in Summerland (except maybe for the one at the round-a-bout) and will do very little, if anything at all, to revitalize the Summerland core and protect our environment. We were informed that our mayor is a proponent of this project because it will give the city some CAD125,000 in revenue. Additional revenue should never justify the destruction of our pristine environment, particularly if there are alternatives. SENIOR LIVING: If seniors age 55-80+ (avg 70, that is what the developers said) would live there, they will be isolated and cut off from the lively-hood of downtown Summerland. Some may have a view, but we would expect that that is overshadowed by their wish to be part of a living community, see children in the street, be able to walk to the shops, restaurants, the bank, etc. lt should be Summerland's objective to revitalize the downtown core with more activity and diversity in terms of people and businesses and strive to enable our seniors to have all the main service and amenities within easy access. This development will not do that at all. In fact we have heard the words "Senior Ghetto" many times to describe this project. TRAFFIC/NOISE: About 320 living units are planned. If we assume that 2 people live in each uuit, a total of more than 600 seniors will live there with an additional 50-60 staff members. The planned pickle ball courts and "fine diniug" restaurant will be public. Two key questions arise: 1) the traffic & noise on the access roads Solly and Latimer (Cars, buses, ambulances, trucks, etc), will increase significantly, not only from residents but from service personnel (staff, ambulances, doctors, visitors, etc). 2) Access will be an issue, both Solly and Latimer are narrow and steep. This will not be seasonal, but year around. The 600 seniors will live in an isolated area connected only through Latimer/Solly. They will not have a direct connection to Lake Shore and will always have to take the bus (?)/car to get out. NEEDS AND CARE: How do we know that there is a need for 600+ seniors to buy and live there? These units will undoubtedly not be cheap (what does a luxurious 1300 sq ft condo cost in S ummerland?). Also, at least as important, where are all the doctors coming from needed to treat 600+ serrior citizens. New people coming to Summerland face a major hurdle to find a doctor, let go 600! GEO-TECHNICAL: Virtually all of the Lower Town substratum is Glacial Till with high risk of slumping and sliding and foundation problems. This is why we designated Red, Orange and Green zones. Most of the Senior's buildings would be surrounded by potentially unstable Glacial Till Cliffs. A Geo Tcchnical study would be needed to ensure that there is no risk of instahility, not just in the valley where the senior village is proposed, but certainly also for the surrounding higher residential areas. High impact building activity could cause instability in the surrounding higher ground and cliffs. STRUCTURES & VIEWS: Buildings are planned with 4-6 stories, which, as far as we know, is higher than anywhere else in Swnmerland! On top of these building will likely be A/C units. All views from the surrounding neighborhoods on Solly Road, Latimer, Bristow and Faircrest will be impacted by the big structures proposed. Either the residences will look at the high buildings themselves or look at the roofs. The developers showed a profile of the height of the buildings in comparison with the elevation of the crossing of Solly and Brislow, but that is the highest point of the valley view and thus deceiving. The most beautiful view from this point (where the beneh is fur the Centennial Trail), will undoubtedly be ruined. All other areas surrounding this valJey are either similar elevation (Bristow) or lower and thus impacted more by the proposed development. They did not show a comparison with Faircrest, which is lower than Solly and Bristow. They promised to make an elevation plot for Faircrest, but so far no such information has been communicated. MARKET IMPACT: It is very likely that the residences surrounding the valley where this huge complex is proposed will lose value. Most of these residences derive their value for a significant part from their views. ALT ERN ATJVES: Along the Lake Shore we have large old warehouses that stand empty/are not utilized, which areas could be used for new development. They are then not directly connected to Main Town either, but at least the seniors can walk to the beach, to the yacht club, to the Local restaurant, to the parks, the pickle ball courts at the municipal campground, and, they can also if they are physically fairly fit, use the new connection with Trout Creek, etc. This seems a much better idea than what is presented now. The developers have not thought about alternatives. Best would of course be, provided there is a need. to build close to downtown, to revitalize our do\\nto\\n core, a strategy for which the current council was elected! Even if the only option would be to develop something in this valley, we kindly ask you to build low profile rnther than a 4-6 story monster, and preserve as much as possible oftbe valley's present pristine status. Furthermore, may the undersigned hope that our mayor and council are not driven by commercial considerations when it comes down to protecting our fragile environment? Sincerely Yours, Arend J. Dronke1·s & Josefa L. Dronkers Summerland Tricia Mayea To: Karen Jones Subject: RE: Icasa Resort   ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From: Peter Waterman   Sent: November 6, 2016 5:59 PM  To: billlyle  t>  Cc: Linda Tynan <[email protected]>; Karen Jones <[email protected]>  Subject: RE: Icasa Resort    Bill ‐ I understand your concern. I and council are committed to land in the ALR. I am sending your concern on  to our CAO for further comment on this parcel's status.     Regards,    Peter Waterman l Mayor     Ph: 250 404‐4042 Fax: 250 494‐1415  PO Box 159, 13211 Henry Avenue  Summerland BC  V0H 1Z0  www.summerland.ca    Facebook: facebook.com/SummerlandBC  Twitter: twitter.com/SummerlandBC    ‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐  From: billlyle     Sent: November 4, 2016 11:39 PM  To: Peter Waterman <[email protected]>  Subject: Icasa Resort    Mr Mayor:  This is agricultural land.  Inside the ALR nothing more needs to be said.  Find another place if you  must but leave our agricultural land alone.    regards     Bill Lyle      1 Action Karen Jones pg ~:...;..\1..J-\,"_\- - ecpyto: From~ Bernadine Jacobs Sent: November 13, 2016 5:38 PM Mayor To: Peter Waterman; Erin Trainer; Janet Peake; Richard Barkwill; Toni~lrin Carlson; Doug Holmes; Mayor and Council -CAO Subject: Bristow Valley -/councll Correspondence - Reailing File: =Agenda Item: ___ Importance! High Refenedk> -·i-- O.npleafby: I am strongly opposed to the rezoning of "Bristow Valley" to allow the construction of high rises for a number of reasons: 1. The amount of traffic that will be generated during construction - concrete trucks, heavy earth moving equipment, dump trucks back and forth with cause congestion on Solly Road and Latimer Avenue. Solly Road is extremely busy now and even busier in the summertime.. Once the deveilopment is done then there would be service vehicles, delivery trucks and employees coming and going and adding to the congestions. 2. Currently the site has one access to it off of Latimer Avenue and just before entering the site there are three blind corne.rs. Accessing the site from Gillespie is also off a blind corner, and the perc-entage of grade to access it off Lakeshore. Drive would require a switchback or two. l 3. Hazard zone: The homes located on the south side of the valley are in the "Red Zone". Any disturbance of the soils could have catastrophic effect on these homes and cause potential slides. If this were to happen the only place the soil is going to go is down to the lakeshore and the fish hatchery. 4. Fire - Any building over 3 stories requires a ladder truck, something which Summerland does not have currently. Who will pay for this, the taxpayers, the developers? Personally I think that this development is wrong for "Lower Town". It is adding too many residences in a small area with limited access. I have lived on Solly Road for 11 years. I moved here from the Lower Mainland for the peace and quiet. I spent my childhood here with my grandparents and remember when I could ride my bike from the top of Hospital Hill to the bottom and not meet a earl 1 don't want to see the quiet neighbourhood change. I think that there needs to be environmental impact, soil stability and traffic studies done and more public input from the neighbours. We need to keep what little agricultural land we have in Summerland agricultural! Bernadine Jacobs 2 From: Brian Wilkey [    Sent: May 17, 2016 12:26 PM  To: Karen Jones <[email protected]>; Ian McIntosh <[email protected]>  Cc: 'Brian Wilkey' <   Subject: Summerland Mayor, Council, and Development Services    This email is in regards to the planned development of a complex off of Latimer for hundreds of condos  and long term care facilities.    It was an interesting meeting last night. I am glad the developer held the meeting.  I think this is nothing more than a development of far too many units, 270 units for sale and lease, and  yes then they will eventually , maybe, have 60 to 80 long term care units or beds developed which will  be nice, but it is simply a huge development complex being proposed until the guise of a health care  facility of such for seniors. The Real estate people were already there ready to start selling the units and  lining their pockets too.    The traffic that this construction will create and the traffic that will be with us forever after it is built is  going to be un believable. Solly Road is already a hazard with people walking up and down it and cars  and trucks having to swerve to the other lane to avoid them, it is NOT good.    This is nothing more than a very large housing complex jammed into a bowl in the middle of lower town.   If and when this or any project on this piece of land moves forward,  they need to have access from the  bottom, from Lakeshore and Gowans and Phillips.    PLEASE be Very Cautious about this project. The developer talked about traffic studies and other studies  that had been done, means nothing to us as we have not seen anyone do any type of study. This will  also negatively affect our property values. There were a lot of not very happy people at the meeting last  night.   This project can be stopped by simply not rezoning the property from agricultural to high density  housing.     Thank you  Brian Wilkey      Brian W. Wilkey  Wilkey Consulting (1996) Ltd.